Afaq Shehzeen, Jain S K, Sharma Nidhi, Sharma Sonika
Department of Anatomy, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 2):S849-S855. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_242_23. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
The foundation of reconstructive and cosmetic surgery is a confluence of advanced technologies, plethora of procedures, inventive modifications, and planned strategies. In surgical planning, the most crucial steps for treating a patient are evaluating the facial morphometry and recognizing the deviations from the baseline values of facial parameters. Various imaging and non-imaging modalities and sub-modalities contribute to diagnosis, treatment planning, and follow-up care. These techniques are an important milestone of pre-, peri-, and postoperative care in facial reconstruction. The current research aims to comprehensively explain imaging and non-imaging technologies encompassing both innovative and traditional approaches in facial reconstruction. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from 1990 to 2022, and systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA recommendations. Undoubtedly, various factors impact the selection of facial analysis acquisition approaches and their prospective. The surgical team must understand such modalities' potential for diagnosis and treatment. The evolution of three-dimensional imaging has been fueled because of the need for devices with high speed, small size, and several functions. Automation with more efficiency and precision is the way of the future for three-dimensional imaging. Stereophotogrammetry can clearly quantify the field of facial analysis. All the publications under consideration came to the same conclusion: Canfield's Vectra three-dimensional imaging devices can provide accurate, repeatable stereophotogrammetric pictures. Although a few minor mistakes were recorded, most examined devices are deemed reliable and accurate tools for Plastic surgeons.
重建外科和整形手术的基础是先进技术、大量手术方法、创新性改良以及精心规划策略的融合。在手术规划中，治疗患者最关键的步骤是评估面部形态测量学并识别面部参数与基线值的偏差。各种成像和非成像方式及子方式有助于诊断、治疗规划和后续护理。这些技术是面部重建术前、术中和术后护理的重要里程碑。当前的研究旨在全面解释涵盖面部重建中创新和传统方法的成像和非成像技术。检索了1990年至2022年期间的PubMed、Scopus和科学网，并按照PRISMA建议进行了系统评价。毫无疑问，各种因素会影响面部分析采集方法的选择及其前景。手术团队必须了解这些方式在诊断和治疗方面的潜力。由于对高速、小型且具备多种功能的设备的需求，推动了三维成像技术的发展。更高效率和精度的自动化是三维成像的未来发展方向。立体摄影测量法能够清晰地量化面部分析领域。所有纳入考量的出版物都得出了相同的结论：Canfield的Vectra三维成像设备能够提供准确、可重复的立体摄影测量图像。尽管记录了一些小错误，但大多数被检测的设备被认为是整形外科医生可靠且准确的工具。
