Suppr超能文献

便携式立体摄影测量设备在面部成像中是否可靠?VECTRA H1设备的验证研究。

Are Portable Stereophotogrammetric Devices Reliable in Facial Imaging? A Validation Study of VECTRA H1 Device.

作者信息

Gibelli Daniele, Pucciarelli Valentina, Cappella Annalisa, Dolci Claudia, Sforza Chiarella

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Laboratorio di Anatomia Funzionale dell'Apparato Stomatognatico (LAFAS), Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Resident, Laboratorio di Anatomia Funzionale dell'Apparato Stomatognatico (LAFAS), Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Aug;76(8):1772-1784. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Modern 3-dimensional (3D) image acquisition systems represent a crucial technologic development in facial anatomy because of their accuracy and precision. The recently introduced portable devices can improve facial databases by increasing the number of applications. In the present study, the VECTRA H1 portable stereophotogrammetric device was validated to verify its applicability to 3D facial analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty volunteers underwent 4 facial scans using portable VECTRA H1 and static VECTRA M3 devices (2 for each instrument). Repeatability of linear, angular, surface area, and volume measurements was verified within the device and between devices using the Bland-Altman test and the calculation of absolute and relative technical errors of measurement (TEM and rTEM, respectively). In addition, the 2 scans obtained by the same device and the 2 scans obtained by different devices were registered and superimposed to calculate the root mean square (RMS; point-to-point) distance between the 2 surfaces.

RESULTS

Most linear, angular, and surface area measurements had high repeatability in M3 versus M3, H1 versus H1, and M3 versus H1 comparisons (range, 82.2 to 98.7%; TEM range, 0.3 to 2.0 mm, 0.4° to 1.8°; rTEM range, 0.2 to 3.1%). In contrast, volumes and RMS distances showed evident differences in M3 versus M3 and H1 versus H1 comparisons and reached the maximum when scans from the 2 different devices were compared.

CONCLUSION

The portable VECTRA H1 device proved reliable for assessing linear measurements, angles, and surface areas; conversely, the influence of involuntary facial movements on volumes and RMS distances was more important compared with the static device.

摘要

目的

现代三维(3D)图像采集系统因其准确性和精确性,代表了面部解剖学领域一项关键的技术发展。最近推出的便携式设备可通过增加应用数量来完善面部数据库。在本研究中,对VECTRA H1便携式立体摄影测量设备进行了验证,以检验其在3D面部分析中的适用性。

材料与方法

50名志愿者使用便携式VECTRA H1设备和静态VECTRA M3设备进行了4次面部扫描(每种设备各2次)。使用Bland-Altman检验以及测量的绝对和相对技术误差计算(分别为TEM和rTEM),在设备内部以及不同设备之间验证线性、角度、表面积和体积测量的可重复性。此外,对同一设备获得的2次扫描以及不同设备获得的2次扫描进行配准和叠加,以计算两个表面之间的均方根(RMS;点对点)距离。

结果

在M3与M3、H1与H1以及M3与H1的比较中,大多数线性、角度和表面积测量具有较高的可重复性(范围为82.2%至98.7%;TEM范围为0.3至2.0毫米,0.4°至1.8°;rTEM范围为0.2至3.1%)。相比之下,体积和RMS距离在M3与M3以及H1与H1的比较中显示出明显差异,并且在比较来自两种不同设备的扫描时达到最大值。

结论

便携式VECTRA H1设备在评估线性测量、角度和表面积方面被证明是可靠的;相反,与静态设备相比,非自主面部运动对体积和RMS距离的影响更为显著。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验