Suppr超能文献

当代神经病理学术中评估方法。

A Contemporary Approach to Intraoperative Evaluation in Neuropathology.

机构信息

From the Department of Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Becker).

the Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Camelo-Piragua, Conway).

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2024 Jun 1;148(6):649-658. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0097-RA.

Abstract

CONTEXT.—: Although the basic principles of intraoperative diagnosis in surgical neuropathology have not changed in the last century, the last several decades have seen dramatic changes in tumor classification, terminology, molecular classification, and modalities used for intraoperative diagnosis. As many neuropathologic intraoperative diagnoses are performed by general surgical pathologists, awareness of these recent changes is important for the most accurate intraoperative diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE.—: To describe recent changes in the practice of intraoperative surgical neuropathology, with an emphasis on new entities, tumor classification, and anticipated ancillary tests, including molecular testing.

DATA SOURCES.—: The sources for this review include the fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System, primary literature on intraoperative diagnosis and newly described tumor entities, and the authors' clinical experience.

CONCLUSIONS.—: A significant majority of neuropathologic diagnoses require ancillary testing, including molecular analysis, for appropriate classification. Therefore, the primary goal for any neurosurgical intraoperative diagnosis is the identification of diagnostic tissue and the preservation of the appropriate tissue for molecular testing. The intraoperative pathologist should seek to place a tumor in the most accurate diagnostic category possible, but specific diagnosis at the time of an intraoperative diagnosis is often not possible. Many entities have seen adjustments to grading criteria, including the incorporation of molecular features into grading. Awareness of these changes can help to avoid overgrading or undergrading at the time of intraoperative evaluation.

摘要

背景

尽管在过去的一个世纪中,外科神经病理学中的术中诊断基本原则没有改变,但在过去几十年中,肿瘤分类、术语、分子分类以及术中诊断使用的方式都发生了巨大变化。由于许多神经病理术中诊断由普通外科病理学家进行,因此了解这些最新变化对于最准确的术中诊断非常重要。

目的

描述术中外科神经病理学实践中的最新变化,重点介绍新实体、肿瘤分类和预期的辅助检测,包括分子检测。

资料来源

本综述的资料来源包括第五版世界卫生组织中枢神经系统肿瘤分类、术中诊断和新描述的肿瘤实体的主要文献以及作者的临床经验。

结论

绝大多数神经病理诊断需要辅助检测,包括分子分析,以进行适当的分类。因此,任何神经外科术中诊断的主要目标都是识别诊断性组织并保留适当的组织进行分子检测。术中病理学家应努力将肿瘤归入最准确的诊断类别,但术中诊断时通常无法进行特定诊断。许多实体的分级标准都进行了调整,包括将分子特征纳入分级。了解这些变化有助于避免在术中评估时过度分级或分级不足。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验