Philosophy Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Behav Brain Sci. 2023 Sep 11;46:e201. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22002114.
We argue that Madole & Harden's distinction between shallow versus deep genetic causes can bring some clarity to causal claims arising from genome-wide association studies (GWASs). However, the authors argue that GWAS only finds shallow genetic causes, making GWAS commensurate with the environmental studies they hope to supplant. We also assess whether their distinction applies best to explanations or causes.
我们认为,马多莱和哈登对浅层与深层遗传原因的区分,可以为全基因组关联研究(GWAS)中产生的因果主张带来一些清晰性。然而,作者认为,GWAS 只能发现浅层遗传原因,这使得 GWAS 与他们希望取代的环境研究相一致。我们还评估了他们的区分是否最适用于解释或原因。