Interuniversity Lab of Motricity Biology, Savoie Mont-Blanc University, Jean Monnet Saint-Etienne Universities, CHU Saint-Etienne, Lyon1, Saint-Etienne, France.
Impairments, Adapted Physical Activities and Rehabilitation Research Unit (UR-DAPAR), National Institute of Youth, Physical Education, and Sports, Abomey-Calavi University (INJEPS-UAC), Porto-Novo, Benin.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Aug;59(4):474-487. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07844-9. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
Muscle changes after stroke cannot be explained solely on the basis of corticospinal bundle damage. Muscle-specific changes contribute to limited functional recovery but have been poorly characterized.
We conducted a systematic review of muscular changes occurring at the histological, neuromuscular and functional levels during the first year after the onset of post-stroke hemiplegia. A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase and CINHAL databases up to November 2022 using a keyword combination comprising cerebral stroke, hemiplegic, atrophy, muscle structure, paresis, skeletal muscle fiber type, motor unit, oxidative stress, strength, motor control.
Twenty-seven trial reports were included in the review, out of 12,798 articles screened. Structural modifications described on the paretic side include atrophy, transformation of type II fibers into type I fibers, decrease in fiber diameter and apparent myofilament disorganization from the first week post-stroke up to the fourth month. Reported biochemical changes comprise the abnormal presence of lipid droplets and glycogen granules in the subsarcolemmal region during the first month post-stroke. At the neurophysiological level, studies indicate an early decrease in the number and activity of motor units, correlated with the degree of motor impairment. All these modifications were present to a lesser degree on the non-paretic side. Although only sparse data concerning the subacute stage are available, these changes seem to appear during the first two weeks post-stroke and continue up to the third or fourth month.
Considering these early pathophysiological changes on both the paretic and non-paretic sides, it seems crucial to promptly stimulate central and also peripheral muscular activation after stroke through specific rehabilitation programs focused on the maintenance of muscle capacities associated with neurological recovery or plasticity.
脑卒中后肌肉的变化不能仅仅基于皮质脊髓束损伤来解释。肌肉特异性变化有助于限制功能恢复,但尚未得到充分描述。
我们对脑卒中后偏瘫发病后 1 年内发生的组织学、神经肌肉和功能水平的肌肉变化进行了系统评价。在 PubMed、Embase 和 CINHAL 数据库中使用包含脑卒中和偏瘫、萎缩、肌肉结构、无力、骨骼肌纤维类型、运动单位、氧化应激、力量、运动控制的关键词组合进行了文献检索,检索时间截至 2022 年 11 月。
在筛选出的 12798 篇文章中,有 27 篇试验报告被纳入综述。偏瘫侧描述的结构改变包括萎缩、II 型纤维向 I 型纤维转化、纤维直径减小和肌丝明显排列紊乱,从脑卒中后第 1 周持续到第 4 个月。报道的生化变化包括脑卒中后第 1 个月亚肌节区异常出现脂质滴和糖原颗粒。在神经生理学水平上,研究表明运动单位的数量和活性早期减少,与运动障碍的程度相关。所有这些改变在非偏瘫侧的程度较轻。尽管只有关于亚急性期的稀疏数据,但这些变化似乎在脑卒中后两周内出现,并持续到第 3 或第 4 个月。
考虑到偏瘫侧和非偏瘫侧的这些早期病理生理变化,通过针对与神经恢复或可塑性相关的肌肉能力维持的特定康复方案,及时刺激中枢和外周肌肉激活似乎至关重要。