Department of Medical Microbiology & Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 11;18(9):e0290893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290893. eCollection 2023.
There is increasing data that show a persistently impaired pulmonary function upon recovery after severe infection. Little is known however about the extent, recovery and determinants of pulmonary impairment across the full spectrum of COVID-19 severity over time.
In a well characterized, prospective cohort of both hospitalised and non-hospitalised individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection, the RECoVERED study, pulmonary function (diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO)) and spirometry) was measured until one year after disease onset. Additionally, data on sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, symptoms, and health-related quality of life (HRQL) were collected. Pulmonary function and these determinants were modelled over time using mixed-effect linear regression. Determinants of pulmonary function impairment at 12 months after disease onset were identified using logistic regression.
Between May 2020 and December 2021, 301 of 349 participants underwent at least one pulmonary function test. After one year of follow-up, 25% of the participants had an impaired pulmonary function which translates in 11%, 22%, and 48% of the participants with mild, moderate and severe/critical COVID-19. Improvement in DLCO among the participants continued over the period across one, six and twelve months. Being older, having more than three comorbidities (p<0·001) and initial severe/critical disease (p<0·001) were associated with slower improvement of pulmonary function over time, adjusted for age and sex. HRQL improved over time and at 12 months was comparable to individuals without impaired pulmonary function.
The prevalence of impaired pulmonary function after twelve months of follow-up, was still significant among those with initially moderate or severe/critical COVID-19. Pulmonary function increased over time in most of the severity groups. These data imply that guidelines regarding revalidation after COVID-19 should target individuals with moderate and severe/critical disease severities.
越来越多的数据表明,在严重感染后恢复时,肺部功能持续受损。然而,关于在整个 COVID-19 严重程度范围内,随着时间的推移,肺部损害的程度、恢复情况和决定因素,人们知之甚少。
在一项对 SARS-CoV-2 感染的住院和非住院个体进行了充分特征描述的前瞻性队列研究中,即 RECoVERED 研究,测量了肺功能(一氧化碳弥散量 (DLCO))和肺活量计),直到发病后一年。此外,还收集了社会人口统计学、临床特征、症状和健康相关生活质量 (HRQL) 数据。使用混合效应线性回归模型对肺功能和这些决定因素随时间的变化进行建模。使用逻辑回归确定发病 12 个月后肺功能受损的决定因素。
在 2020 年 5 月至 2021 年 12 月期间,349 名参与者中有 301 名至少进行了一次肺功能测试。在一年的随访后,25%的参与者出现了肺功能受损,其中轻度、中度和重度/危重症 COVID-19 的患者分别占 11%、22%和 48%。在一个、六个和十二个月的时间里,参与者的 DLCO 持续改善。年龄较大、合并症超过三种(p<0·001)和初始严重/危重症疾病(p<0·001)与肺功能随时间的改善较慢相关,调整了年龄和性别。HRQL 随时间改善,在 12 个月时与肺功能正常的个体相当。
在随访 12 个月后,最初患有中度或重度/危重症 COVID-19 的患者中,肺功能受损的患病率仍然显著。在大多数严重程度组中,肺功能随时间增加。这些数据表明,COVID-19 后再验证的指南应针对中度和重度/危重症疾病的个体。