• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健参与和参与社区心理健康服务共享护理安排以预防严重精神疾病患者的障碍和促进因素:范围审查。

Barriers and facilitators to the participation and engagement of primary care in shared-care arrangements with community mental health services for preventive care of people with serious mental illness: a scoping review.

机构信息

Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Susan Wakil School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales , Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 11;23(1):977. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09918-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-09918-2
PMID:37697280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10494334/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

People with serious mental illness die about 20 years earlier than the general population from preventable diseases. Shared-care arrangements between general practitioners and mental health services can improve consumers' access to preventive care, but implementing shared care is challenging. This scoping review sought to describe current evidence on the barriers and facilitators to the participation and engagement of primary care (specifically general practitioners) in shared-care arrangements with community mental health services for preventive health care of this population.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, APA PsychINFO and EBM Reviews from 2010 to 2022. Data was extracted against a Microsoft Excel template developed for the review. Data was synthesised through tabulation and narrative methods.

RESULTS

We identified 295 records. After eligibility screening and full-text review, seven studies were included. Facilitators of engagement included a good fit with organisation and practice and opportunities to increase collaboration, specific roles to promote communication and coordination and help patients to navigate appointments, multidisciplinary teams and teamwork, and access to shared medical/health records. Barriers included a lack of willingness and motivation on the part of providers and low levels of confidence with tasks, lack of physical structures to produce capacity, poor alignment of funding/incentives, inability to share patient information and challenges engaging people with severe mental illness in the service and with their care.

CONCLUSION

Our results were consistent with other research on shared care and suggests that the broader literature is likely to be applicable to the context of general practitioner/mental health services shared care. Specific challenges relating to this cohort present difficulties for recruitment and retention in shared care programs. Sharing "goals and knowledge, mutual respect" and engaging in "frequent, timely, accurate, problem-solving communication", supported by structures such as shared information systems are likely to engage primary care in shared care arrangements more than the traditional focus on incentives, education, and guidelines.

摘要

背景

严重精神疾病患者的死亡人数比一般人群早 20 年,其死因是可预防的疾病。全科医生和精神卫生服务机构之间的共同照护安排可以改善患者获得预防保健的机会,但实施共同照护具有挑战性。本范围综述旨在描述当前关于初级保健(特别是全科医生)参与和参与社区精神卫生服务机构共同照护安排以进行该人群预防保健的障碍和促进因素的证据。

方法

我们检索了 2010 年至 2022 年期间的 Medline、Embase、CINAHL、Scopus、APA PsychINFO 和 EBM Reviews。使用为该综述开发的 Microsoft Excel 模板提取数据。通过制表和叙述方法对数据进行综合。

结果

我们确定了 295 条记录。经过资格筛选和全文审查,纳入了 7 项研究。参与的促进因素包括与组织和实践的良好契合度,以及增加合作的机会、促进沟通和协调以及帮助患者预约的特定角色、多学科团队和团队合作,以及获取共享的医疗/健康记录。障碍包括提供者缺乏意愿和动力,以及对任务的信心不足,缺乏产生能力的物理结构,资金/激励措施的不一致,无法共享患者信息,以及在服务中以及在与他们的护理中难以接触到严重精神疾病患者。

结论

我们的研究结果与其他关于共同照护的研究一致,并表明更广泛的文献可能适用于全科医生/精神卫生服务共同照护的背景。与该队列相关的具体挑战给共同照护计划的招募和保留带来了困难。共享“目标和知识、相互尊重”,并进行“频繁、及时、准确、解决问题的沟通”,并辅以共享信息系统等结构,可能比传统的关注激励措施、教育和指南更能使初级保健参与共同照护安排。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94ab/10494334/cefcc86730b2/12913_2023_9918_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94ab/10494334/6515231cc205/12913_2023_9918_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94ab/10494334/cefcc86730b2/12913_2023_9918_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94ab/10494334/6515231cc205/12913_2023_9918_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94ab/10494334/cefcc86730b2/12913_2023_9918_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to the participation and engagement of primary care in shared-care arrangements with community mental health services for preventive care of people with serious mental illness: a scoping review.初级保健参与和参与社区心理健康服务共享护理安排以预防严重精神疾病患者的障碍和促进因素:范围审查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 11;23(1):977. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09918-2.
2
Conceptual framework on barriers and facilitators to implementing perinatal mental health care and treatment for women: the MATRIx evidence synthesis.关于为女性实施围产期心理健康护理和治疗的障碍与促进因素的概念框架:MATRIx证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jan;12(2):1-187. doi: 10.3310/KQFE0107.
3
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Opportunities and practices supporting responsive health care for forced migrants: lessons from transnational practice and a mixed-methods systematic review.支持为被迫移民提供响应式医疗服务的机遇与实践:跨国实践经验及混合方法系统评价
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May;13(13):1-182. doi: 10.3310/MRWK3419.
8
Mental health practitioner experiences of engaging with service users in community mental health settings: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence.精神健康从业者在社区精神卫生环境中与服务使用者互动的体验:定性证据的系统评价和主题综合。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Dec;27(6):807-820. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12628. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
9
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term chronic conditions in individuals with mental and behavioural disorders: A data linkage study.患有精神和行为障碍个体的长期慢性病:一项数据关联研究。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;59(3):260-269. doi: 10.1177/00048674251315647. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
2
Breaking Barriers Transforming Primary Care to Serve the Physical Health Needs of Individuals With SMI in the NHS.突破障碍:在英国国家医疗服务体系中转变初级医疗服务,以满足严重精神疾病患者的身体健康需求。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Feb;34(1):e13480. doi: 10.1111/inm.13480.
3
Exploring the feasibility of Recovery Management Checkups for Primary Care in a Federally Qualified Health Center.

本文引用的文献

1
Shared guidelines and protocols to achieve better health outcomes for people living with serious mental illness.为患有严重精神疾病的人实现更好健康结果的共享指南和协议。
Med J Aust. 2022 Oct 2;217 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S34-S35. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51711.
2
An Overview of Reviews on Interprofessional Collaboration in Primary Care: Barriers and Facilitators.基层医疗中跨专业协作的综述概述:障碍与促进因素
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Jun 22;21(2):32. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5589.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
探索在联邦合格健康中心的初级保健中实施康复管理检查的可行性。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 11;12:1443409. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1443409. eCollection 2024.
4
Mental health crisis situations: the nurse's work in Primary Health Care.心理健康危机情况:初级保健中的护士工作。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2024 Oct 25;32:e4356. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.7015.4356. eCollection 2024.
PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
4
Severe mental illness and health service utilisation for nonpsychiatric medical disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.严重精神疾病与非精神科医疗障碍的卫生服务利用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 14;17(9):e1003284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003284. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
Collaborative care for mental health: a qualitative study of the experiences of patients and health professionals.心理健康协作照护:一项关于患者和卫生专业人员体验的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 9;20(1):844. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05691-8.
6
Pragmatic trial design of an intervention to reduce cardiovascular risk in people with serious mental illness.一项旨在降低严重精神疾病患者心血管风险的干预措施的实用临床试验设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Apr;91:105964. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105964. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
7
The Lancet Psychiatry Commission: a blueprint for protecting physical health in people with mental illness.《柳叶刀》精神病学委员会:保护精神疾病患者身体健康的蓝图。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;6(8):675-712. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30132-4. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
8
Barriers and facilitators to integrating primary and specialist healthcare in the United Kingdom: a narrative literature review.英国初级医疗与专科医疗整合的障碍与促进因素:一项叙述性文献综述
Future Healthc J. 2018 Feb;5(1):64-80. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.5-1-64.
9
Relational coordination in interprofessional teams and its effect on patient-reported benefit and continuity of care: a prospective cohort study from rehabilitation centres in Western Norway.跨专业团队中的关系协调及其对患者报告的益处和护理连续性的影响:来自挪威西部康复中心的一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 17;18(1):719. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3536-5.
10
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.