Lee Juyoung, Choi Euysoon
College of Nursing, Catholic University, Korea.
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2010 Sep;16(3):234-244. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2010.16.3.234.
This study determined the level of stress and type of coping style of spouses with high-risk pregnant women.
Subjects were 102 spouses with high-risk pregnant women at 6 hospitals in Seoul and Gyeonggi province from January to August, 2009. The tools for this study were stress scale and coping scale. The data were analyzed by t-test, ANOVA, Scheffe's test and Pearson's correlation coefficient.
The average score of subjects stress was 2.18 and coping score was 2.46 point out of 4.00. The highest score of stress categories was 2.44 point in emotional problems and the lowest score was 1.72 in communication and support resources. The stress level was significant differences according to length of marriage, number of hospital visits, satisfaction with marriage relationship, hospitalization days and gestational age respectively. Spouses tended to use an active coping style (2.60) rather than a passive coping style (2.31). There were significant differences according to mother's age and gestational age in active coping and educational level in passive coping.
Considering the level of stress coping style and characteristics of high-risk pregnant women's spouses, a nursing intervention should be provided to help them alleviate stress and to encourage active coping.
本研究确定了高危孕妇配偶的压力水平及应对方式类型。
研究对象为2009年1月至8月期间在首尔和京畿道6家医院的102名高危孕妇的配偶。本研究使用的工具为压力量表和应对方式量表。数据采用t检验、方差分析、谢弗检验和皮尔逊相关系数进行分析。
研究对象的压力平均得分为2.18分，应对方式平均得分为2.46分（满分4.00分）。压力类别中得分最高的是情绪问题，为2.44分，得分最低的是沟通与支持资源，为1.72分。压力水平在婚姻时长、就诊次数、对婚姻关系的满意度、住院天数和孕周方面分别存在显著差异。配偶倾向于采用积极应对方式（2.60）而非消极应对方式（2.31）。在积极应对方面，根据母亲年龄和孕周存在显著差异；在消极应对方面，根据教育水平存在显著差异。
考虑到高危孕妇配偶的压力应对水平及特点，应提供护理干预以帮助他们减轻压力并鼓励积极应对。
