• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连续分配:扩展标准供体肾脏和儿科肾脏候选者的问题。

Continuous allocation: The problem with EPTS and pediatric kidney candidates.

作者信息

Engen Rachel M, Weiss Samantha, Peterson Caitlin G

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Transplant. 2023 Nov;27(7):e14608. doi: 10.1111/petr.14608. Epub 2023 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1111/petr.14608
PMID:37697939
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 2014 Kidney Allocation System (KAS) introduced longevity matching for adult candidates using the Estimated Post-Transplant Survival (EPTS) score, which includes candidate age, time on dialysis, diabetes status, and number of previous solid organ transplants. The proposed continuous distribution framework may expand the use of this attribute to pediatric candidates, but there is no data on its performance among pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 6800 pediatric kidney transplant recipients from 2001 to 2011 using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) data. EPTS score was calculated for each patient and compared to reported patient survival to estimate the validity of the score in children.

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 14.01 years (IQR 9.29-16.37 years), and dialysis vintage was 0.67 years (IQR 0-1.82 years). 18.2% of the cohort had a prior transplant and 1% had diabetes. Median EPTS score was 2 (IQR 1-2). Seven percent of patients died during the study period and 54.7% of the cohort was censored prior to 10 years. The c-statistic was 0.505 (95% CI: 0.49-0.53).

CONCLUSION

Overall, EPTS is not a valid predictor of patient survival among pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

摘要

背景

2014年肾脏分配系统(KAS)引入了使用估计移植后生存期(EPTS)评分对成年候选者进行寿命匹配,该评分包括候选者年龄、透析时间、糖尿病状态以及既往实体器官移植次数。所提议的连续分布框架可能会将此属性的应用扩展到儿科候选者,但尚无关于其在儿科肾移植受者中表现的数据。

方法

我们利用器官获取与移植网络(OPTN)数据,对2001年至2011年期间6800名儿科肾移植受者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。计算每名患者的EPTS评分,并与报告的患者生存期进行比较,以评估该评分在儿童中的有效性。

结果

患者的中位年龄为14.01岁(四分位间距9.29 - 16.37岁),透析时间为0.67年(四分位间距0 - 1.82年)。队列中有18.2%的患者曾接受过移植,1%的患者患有糖尿病。EPTS评分中位数为2(四分位间距1 - 2)。7%的患者在研究期间死亡,54.7%的队列在10年之前被截尾。c统计量为0.505(95%置信区间:0.49 - 0.53)。

结论

总体而言,EPTS并非儿科肾移植受者患者生存期的有效预测指标。

相似文献

1
Continuous allocation: The problem with EPTS and pediatric kidney candidates.连续分配:扩展标准供体肾脏和儿科肾脏候选者的问题。
Pediatr Transplant. 2023 Nov;27(7):e14608. doi: 10.1111/petr.14608. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
2
VO prior to transplant differentiates survival post kidney transplant.移植前的VO可区分肾移植后的生存率。
Clin Transplant. 2022 Feb;36(2):e14517. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14517. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
3
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Among Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients Before and After Utilizing Estimated Posttransplant Survival Score for Kidneys Allocation in Malaysia.马来西亚采用估计的肾移植后生存评分进行肾脏分配前后已故供体肾移植受者临床结局的比较。
Transplant Proc. 2022 Mar;54(2):278-281. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.01.002. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
4
Temporal validation of the Australian estimated post-transplant survival score.澳大利亚移植后估计生存分数的时间验证。
Nephrology (Carlton). 2023 May;28(5):292-298. doi: 10.1111/nep.14158.
5
Allocation of the Highest Quality Kidneys and Transplant Outcomes Under the New Kidney Allocation System.新的肾脏分配系统下最优质量肾脏的分配与移植结果。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 May;73(5):605-614. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.12.036. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
6
Regional Disparities in Transplantation With Deceased Donor Kidneys With Kidney Donor Profile Index Less Than 20% Among Candidates With Top 20% Estimated Post Transplant Survival.移植术后估计生存率处于前20%的候选者中,肾供体特征指数低于20%的已故供体肾脏移植的地区差异。
Prog Transplant. 2019 Dec;29(4):354-360. doi: 10.1177/1526924819874699. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
7
[Patient survival scale after kidney transplant from deceased donors in Veracruz, Mexico].[墨西哥韦拉克鲁斯已故捐赠者肾移植后的患者生存量表]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2019 May 2;57(3):149-155.
8
Geographic disparity in kidney transplantation under KAS.KAS 下的肾移植中的地域差异。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Jun;18(6):1415-1423. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14622. Epub 2018 Jan 27.
9
Development of predictive score for post-transplant survival based on pre-transplant recipient characteristics.基于移植前受者特征的移植后生存预测评分的制定。
Korean J Transplant. 2021 Jun 30;35(2):86-92. doi: 10.4285/kjt.21.0011.
10
The real unmet need: A multifactorial approach for identifying sensitized kidney candidates with low access to transplant.真正未满足的需求:一种多因素方法,用于确定低移植机会的致敏肾脏候选者。
Clin Transplant. 2023 May;37(5):e14946. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14946. Epub 2023 Mar 13.