• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全息 3D 肾段重建术通过促进机器人辅助部分肾切除术中选择性肾动脉夹闭的选择,保护肾功能。

Holographic 3D renal segments reconstruction protects renal function by promote choice of selective renal artery clamping during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.

Department of Urology, Tibet CORPS Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Lhasa, 850000, Tibet, China.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2023 Nov;41(11):2975-2983. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04599-2. Epub 2023 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-023-04599-2
PMID:37698633
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of selective artery clamping (SAC) and main artery clamping (MAC) during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) on renal function and the influence of holographic three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of renal segments on the selection between SAC and MAC.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent RAPN at First Hospital Affiliated to the Army Medical University between December 2016 and July 2022. According to the clamping methods, the patients were divided into the SAC group and the MAC group. The primary outcome was renal function.

RESULTS

A total of 422 patients (194 in the SAC group and 228 in the MAC group) were included. The RAPN procedures were all completed successfully. The patients in SAC group had less glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline in the affected kidney (8.6 ± 7.0 ml/min vs. 18.7 ± 10.9 ml/min, P < 0.001) and minor estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decrease (4.3 ± 10.5 ml/min vs. 12.6 ± 12.1 ml/min, P < 0.001) than those in MAC group. Among 37 patients with baseline renal insufficiency, the GFR decline of the affected kidney in the SAC subgroup was significantly lower than in the MAC subgroup (5.5 ± 6.5 ml/min vs. 14.3 ± 9.2 ml/min, P = 0.002). The proportion of patients who underwent 3D reconstruction was significant higher in the SAC group than in the MAC group. (65.46% vs. 28.07%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The SAC technique during RAPN may serve as a protective measure for renal function, while the implementation of holographic 3D renal segment reconstruction technique may facilitate optimal selection of SAC.

摘要

目的

探讨机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)中选择性动脉夹闭(SAC)和主动脉夹闭(MAC)对肾功能的影响,以及肾段的全息三维(3D)重建对 SAC 和 MAC 选择的影响。

方法

本回顾性观察性研究纳入 2016 年 12 月至 2022 年 7 月在中国人民解放军陆军军医大学第一附属医院接受 RAPN 的患者。根据夹闭方法,患者分为 SAC 组和 MAC 组。主要结局为肾功能。

结果

共纳入 422 例患者(SAC 组 194 例,MAC 组 228 例)。所有 RAPN 手术均顺利完成。SAC 组患者患侧肾脏肾小球滤过率(GFR)下降较少(8.6±7.0ml/min 比 18.7±10.9ml/min,P<0.001),估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)下降较小(4.3±10.5ml/min 比 12.6±12.1ml/min,P<0.001)。在 37 例基线肾功能不全患者中,SAC 亚组患者患侧肾脏 GFR 下降明显低于 MAC 亚组(5.5±6.5ml/min 比 14.3±9.2ml/min,P=0.002)。SAC 组行 3D 重建的患者比例明显高于 MAC 组(65.46%比 28.07%,P<0.001)。

结论

RAPN 中 SAC 技术可能是保护肾功能的一种措施,而全息 3D 肾段重建技术的实施可能有助于 SAC 的最佳选择。

相似文献

1
Holographic 3D renal segments reconstruction protects renal function by promote choice of selective renal artery clamping during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.全息 3D 肾段重建术通过促进机器人辅助部分肾切除术中选择性肾动脉夹闭的选择,保护肾功能。
World J Urol. 2023 Nov;41(11):2975-2983. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04599-2. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
2
Selective arterial clamping does not improve outcomes in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a propensity-score analysis of patients without impaired renal function.选择性动脉夹闭术并不能改善机器人辅助肾部分切除术的预后:一项针对肾功能未受损患者的倾向评分分析。
BJU Int. 2017 Mar;119(3):430-435. doi: 10.1111/bju.13614. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
3
Renal Functional and Perioperative Outcomes of Selective Versus Complete Renal Arterial Clamping During Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Early Single-Center Experience With 39 Cases.机器人辅助部分肾切除术期间选择性与完全性肾动脉阻断的肾功能及围手术期结局:39例单中心早期经验
Surg Innov. 2016 Jun;23(3):242-8. doi: 10.1177/1553350615610648. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
4
Renal Functional and Perioperative Outcomes of Retroperitoneal Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy with Segmental Renal Artery Clamping.后腹腔镜机器人辅助与腹腔镜下部分肾切除术并肾段动脉阻断的肾功能及围手术期结局
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 May;32(5):545-549. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0437. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
5
Possible Detrimental Effects of Clamping Main Versus Segmental Renal Arteries for the Achievement of Renal Global Ischemia During Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy.机器人辅助部分肾切除术期间,夹闭主肾动脉与节段性肾动脉以实现肾脏整体缺血的潜在有害影响。
J Endourol. 2015 Jul;29(7):785-90. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0834. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
6
Superselective Ischemia in Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Does Not Provide Better Long-term Renal Function than Renal Artery Clamping in a Randomized Controlled Trial (EMERALD): Should We Take the Risk?机器人辅助部分肾切除术中超选择性缺血与随机对照试验中肾动脉夹闭相比并不能提供更好的长期肾功能:我们是否应该冒险?
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 May;8(3):769-776. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
7
The Impact of Arterial Clamping Technique in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy on Renal Function and Surgical Outcomes: Six-Year Experience at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand.动脉阻断技术在机器人辅助部分肾切除术中对肾功能及手术结果的影响:泰国诗里拉吉医院的六年经验
Urol Int. 2018;100(3):301-308. doi: 10.1159/000486319. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
8
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for large complex renal cancer: step-by-step segmental artery unclamping.机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗大型复杂肾癌:逐步节段性动脉松解。
Int Braz J Urol. 2023 May-Jun;49(3):393-394. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0572.
9
Fluorescence-guided selective arterial clamping during RAPN provides better early functional outcomes based on renal scan compared to standard clamping.荧光引导下选择性动脉夹闭在 RAPN 中提供了更好的早期肾功能结果,与标准夹闭相比基于肾扫描。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Jun;13(3):391-396. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0862-x. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
10
Comparison of selective and main renal artery clamping in partial nephrectomy of renal cell cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.肾细胞癌部分肾切除术中选择性肾动脉阻断与主要肾动脉阻断的比较:一项遵循PRISMA的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(34):e11856. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011856.

本文引用的文献

1
New Generation of 3D Virtual Models with Perfusional Zones: Perioperative Assistance for the Best Pedicle Management during Robotic Partial Nephrectomy.新一代具有灌注区的 3D 虚拟模型:机器人辅助部分肾切除术期间最佳肾门管理的围手术期辅助。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Apr 1;30(4):4021-4032. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30040304.
2
A Novel Three-dimensional Planning Tool for Selective Clamping During Partial Nephrectomy: Validation of a Perfusion Zone Algorithm.一种用于部分肾切除术选择性夹闭的新型三维规划工具:灌注区算法的验证。
Eur Urol. 2023 May;83(5):413-421. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.01.003. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
3
3D renal model for surgical planning of partial nephrectomy: A way to improve surgical outcomes.
用于部分肾切除术手术规划的3D肾脏模型:一种改善手术效果的方法。
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 21;12:1046505. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1046505. eCollection 2022.
4
Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Mid-Term Oncologic Outcomes: A Systematic Review.机器人辅助部分肾切除术的中期肿瘤学结果:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 19;11(20):6165. doi: 10.3390/jcm11206165.
5
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy with En Bloc Removal of a Renal Vein Thrombus for Multiple cT3a Renal Cell Carcinoma Lesions.机器人辅助肾部分切除术整块切除肾静脉血栓治疗多发cT3a期肾细胞癌病灶
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Aug 22;44:33-36. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.08.002. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with 3D preoperative surgical planning: video presentation of the florentine experience.机器人辅助部分肾切除术与 3D 术前手术规划:佛罗伦萨经验的视频介绍。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Nov-Dec;47(6):1272-1273. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.1075.
7
Cadaveric study of arterial renal anatomy and its surgical implications in partial nephrectomy.尸体研究动脉肾解剖及其在部分肾切除术的外科意义。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2021 Sep;43(9):1449-1459. doi: 10.1007/s00276-021-02769-8. Epub 2021 May 22.
8
Superselective Ischemia in Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Does Not Provide Better Long-term Renal Function than Renal Artery Clamping in a Randomized Controlled Trial (EMERALD): Should We Take the Risk?机器人辅助部分肾切除术中超选择性缺血与随机对照试验中肾动脉夹闭相比并不能提供更好的长期肾功能:我们是否应该冒险?
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 May;8(3):769-776. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
9
Comparison of outcomes between laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: RENAL score ≥7 or maximum tumor size >4 cm.腹腔镜与机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗复杂肾肿瘤的结局比较:RENAL 评分≥7 或最大肿瘤直径>4cm。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021 Apr;73(2):154-164. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.20.04135-1. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
10
Three-dimensional Augmented Reality Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Case of Complex Tumours (PADUA ≥10): A New Intraoperative Tool Overcoming the Ultrasound Guidance.三维增强现实机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗复杂肿瘤(PADUA≥10):一种克服超声引导的新术中工具。
Eur Urol. 2020 Aug;78(2):229-238. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.11.024. Epub 2019 Dec 30.