Thompson Trevor, Stathi Sofia, Buckley Francesca, Shin Jae Il, Liang Chih-Sung
Centre for Chronic Illness and Ageing, University of Greenwich, London, SE9 2UG, UK.
Centre for Inequalities, University of Greenwich, London, SE9 2UG, UK.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Feb;39(2):214-221. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08401-2. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
Despite initiatives to eradicate racial inequalities in pain treatment, there is no clear picture on whether this has translated to changes in clinical practice.
To determine whether racial disparities in the receipt of pain medication in the emergency department have diminished over a 22-year period from 1999 to 2020.
We used data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, an annual, cross-sectional probability sample of visits to emergency departments of non-federal general and short-stay hospitals in the USA.
Pain-related visits to the ED by Black or White patients.
Prescriptions for opioid and non-opioid analgesics.
A total of 203,854 of all sampled 625,433 ED visits (35%) by Black or White patients were pain-related, translating to a population-weighted estimate of over 42 million actual visits to US emergency departments for pain annually across 1999-2020. Relative risk regression found visits by White patients were 1.26 (95% CI, 1.22-1.30; p<0.001) times more likely to result in an opioid prescription for pain compared to Black patients (40% vs. 32%). Visits by Black patients were also 1.25 (95% CI, 1.21-1.30; p<0.001) times more likely to result in non-opioid analgesics only being prescribed. Results were not substantively altered after adjusting for insurance status, type and severity of pain, geographical region, and other potential confounders. Spline regression found no evidence of meaningful change in the magnitude of racial disparities in prescribed pain medication over 22 years.
Initiatives to create equitable healthcare do not appear to have resulted in meaningful alleviation of racial disparities in pain treatment in the emergency department.
尽管已采取措施消除疼痛治疗中的种族不平等现象,但对于这是否已转化为临床实践的改变尚无清晰图景。
确定在1999年至2020年的22年期间,急诊科疼痛药物使用方面的种族差异是否有所减少。
我们使用了美国国家医院门诊医疗调查的数据,该调查是对美国非联邦综合医院和短期住院医院急诊科就诊情况的年度横断面概率抽样。
黑人或白人患者因疼痛到急诊科就诊。
阿片类和非阿片类镇痛药的处方。
在所有抽样的625,433次急诊科就诊中,黑人或白人患者共有203,854次(35%)与疼痛相关,这意味着在1999年至2020年期间,美国急诊科每年因疼痛实际就诊人数经人口加权估计超过4200万。相对风险回归发现,与黑人患者相比,白人患者因疼痛开具阿片类药物处方的可能性高1.26倍(95%置信区间,1.22 - 1.30;p<0.001)(40%对32%)。黑人患者就诊时仅开具非阿片类镇痛药的可能性也高1.25倍(95%置信区间,1.21 - 1.30;p<0.001)。在调整保险状况、疼痛类型和严重程度、地理区域及其他潜在混杂因素后,结果没有实质性改变。样条回归发现,在22年期间,开具疼痛药物方面的种族差异幅度没有明显有意义的变化。
旨在创建公平医疗保健的举措似乎并未有效缓解急诊科疼痛治疗中的种族差异。