Suppr超能文献

遗传信息在研究和知情同意中的再利用。

The reuse of genetic information in research and informed consent.

机构信息

Institut Borja de Bioetica, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain.

EUI San Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Dec;31(12):1393-1397. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01457-y. Epub 2023 Sep 13.

Abstract

Important advances in genetics research have been made in recent years. Such advances have facilitated the availability of huge amounts of genetic information that could potentially be reused beyond the original purpose for which such information was obtained. Any such reuse must meet certain ethical criteria to ensure that the dignity, integrity, and autonomy of the individual from whom that information was obtained are protected. The aim of this paper is to reflect on these criteria through a critical analysis of the literature. To guarantee these values, ethical criteria need to be established in several respects. For instance, the question must be posed whether the information requires special attention and protection (so-called genetic exceptionalism). Another aspect to bear in mind is the most appropriate type of consent to be given by the person involved, on the one hand favouring research and the reuse of genetic information while on the other protecting the autonomy of that person. Finally, there is a need to determine what protection such reuse should have in order to avoid detrimental consequences and protect the rights of the individual. The main conclusions are that genetic information requires special care and protection (genetic exceptionalism) and that broad consent is the most practical and trustworthy type of consent for the reuse of genetic information.

摘要

近年来,遗传学研究取得了重要进展。这些进展使得大量的遗传信息得以获取,这些信息有可能在超出原始获取目的的情况下被重复利用。任何此类重复利用都必须符合一定的伦理标准,以确保从信息来源获得信息的个人的尊严、完整性和自主权得到保护。本文旨在通过对文献的批判性分析来反思这些标准。为了保证这些价值观,需要在几个方面建立伦理标准。例如,必须提出这样一个问题:信息是否需要特别关注和保护(所谓的遗传例外主义)。另一个需要考虑的方面是由相关人员提供的最合适的同意类型,一方面有利于研究和遗传信息的重复利用,另一方面又保护该人员的自主权。最后,有必要确定这种重复利用应该受到何种保护,以避免不利后果并保护个人的权利。主要结论是,遗传信息需要特别的关注和保护(遗传例外主义),而广泛的同意是重复利用遗传信息最实用和最值得信赖的同意类型。

相似文献

1
The reuse of genetic information in research and informed consent.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Dec;31(12):1393-1397. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01457-y. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
2
[The origin of informed consent].
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
Property rights in genetic information.
Ethics Inf Technol. 2004;6(1):29-42. doi: 10.1023/b:etin.0000036157.14807.b0.
4
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
5
Genetic information, rights, and autonomy.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2001 Sep;22(5):403-14. doi: 10.1023/a:1013097617552.
6
Genomic research and data-mining technology: implications for personal privacy and informed consent.
Ethics Inf Technol. 2004;6(1):15-28. doi: 10.1023/b:etin.0000036156.77169.31.
7
[Informed consent for genetic information management in Colombian law].
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 2011 Jul-Dec(35):183-223.
8
Informed consent for research participation in frail older persons.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2004 Feb;16(1):79-85. doi: 10.1007/BF03324536.
9
10
The Genetic Privacy Act: an analysis of privacy and research concerns.
J Law Med Ethics. 1997 Winter;25(4):256-72, 230. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1997.tb01408.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacogenetics or predictive genetics? APOE testing blurs the lines.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 21;16:1627239. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1627239. eCollection 2025.
2
Ambivalence and regret in genome sequencing.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Dec;31(12):1343. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01491-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Ten years of dynamic consent in the CHRIS study: informed consent as a dynamic process.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Dec;30(12):1391-1397. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01160-4. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
2
Evaluating models of consent in changing health research environments.
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Jun;25(2):269-280. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10074-3. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
3
Appropriate Safeguards and Article 89 of the GDPR: Considerations for Biobank, Databank and Genetic Research.
Front Genet. 2022 Feb 18;13:719317. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.719317. eCollection 2022.
4
Can we know if donor trust expires? About trust relationships and time in the context of open consent for future data use.
J Med Ethics. 2022 Mar;48(3):184-188. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106244. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
5
A framework for ethics review of applications to store, reuse and share tissue samples.
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Jul;39(1):115-124. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00126-4. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
6
Ethical Issues in Consent for the Reuse of Data in Health Data Platforms.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Feb 4;27(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00282-0.
7
Reflections on dynamic consent in biomedical research: the story so far.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Apr;29(4):649-656. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00771-z. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
8
Responsible, practical genomic data sharing that accelerates research.
Nat Rev Genet. 2020 Oct;21(10):615-629. doi: 10.1038/s41576-020-0257-5. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
9
Future-proofing biobanks' governance.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Aug;28(8):989-996. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0646-4. Epub 2020 May 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验