• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检测性状-性状协同进化中的自然选择。

Detecting natural selection in trait-trait coevolution.

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Present address: Department of Quantitative and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.

出版信息

BMC Ecol Evol. 2023 Sep 12;23(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12862-023-02164-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12862-023-02164-4
PMID:37700252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10496359/
Abstract

No phenotypic trait evolves independently of all other traits, but the cause of trait-trait coevolution is poorly understood. While the coevolution could arise simply from pleiotropic mutations that simultaneously affect the traits concerned, it could also result from multivariate natural selection favoring certain trait relationships. To gain a general mechanistic understanding of trait-trait coevolution, we examine the evolution of 220 cell morphology traits across 16 natural strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the evolution of 24 wing morphology traits across 110 fly species of the family Drosophilidae, along with the variations of these traits among gene deletion or mutation accumulation lines (a.k.a. mutants). For numerous trait pairs, the phenotypic correlation among evolutionary lineages differs significantly from that among mutants. Specifically, we find hundreds of cases where the evolutionary correlation between traits is strengthened or reversed relative to the mutational correlation, which, according to our population genetic simulation, is likely caused by multivariate selection. Furthermore, we detect selection for enhanced modularity of the yeast traits analyzed. Together, these results demonstrate that trait-trait coevolution is shaped by natural selection and suggest that the pleiotropic structure of mutation is not optimal. Because the morphological traits analyzed here are chosen largely because of their measurability and thereby are not expected to be biased with regard to natural selection, our conclusion is likely general.

摘要

没有任何表型特征是独立于所有其他特征进化的,但特征-特征协同进化的原因还不清楚。虽然协同进化可能仅仅是由于同时影响相关特征的多效突变引起的,但也可能是由于多变量自然选择有利于某些特征关系而导致的。为了从机制上全面了解特征-特征协同进化,我们研究了 16 个酿酒酵母自然菌株的 220 个细胞形态特征的进化,以及 110 个果蝇科果蝇物种的 24 个翅膀形态特征的进化,以及这些特征在基因缺失或突变积累系(也称为突变体)中的变化。对于许多特征对,进化谱系之间的表型相关性与突变体之间的相关性显著不同。具体来说,我们发现了数百种情况,即相对于突变相关性,特征之间的进化相关性得到了加强或逆转,根据我们的群体遗传模拟,这很可能是多变量选择的结果。此外,我们还检测到酵母特征分析中增强模块性的选择。总之,这些结果表明,特征-特征协同进化是由自然选择塑造的,并表明突变的多效结构不是最优的。由于这里分析的形态特征主要是因为它们的可测量性,因此预计不会偏向于自然选择,因此我们的结论可能是普遍的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19c/10496359/9a4d170f3371/12862_2023_2164_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19c/10496359/a10d1e1e202f/12862_2023_2164_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19c/10496359/695350267054/12862_2023_2164_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19c/10496359/9a4d170f3371/12862_2023_2164_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19c/10496359/a10d1e1e202f/12862_2023_2164_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19c/10496359/695350267054/12862_2023_2164_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d19c/10496359/9a4d170f3371/12862_2023_2164_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Detecting natural selection in trait-trait coevolution.检测性状-性状协同进化中的自然选择。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2023 Sep 12;23(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12862-023-02164-4.
2
Fly wing evolution explained by a neutral model with mutational pleiotropy.具有突变多效性的中性模型解释飞翼的进化。
Evolution. 2020 Sep;74(9):2158-2167. doi: 10.1111/evo.14076. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
3
The relative impact of evolving pleiotropy and mutational correlation on trait divergence.进化的多效性和突变相关性对性状分歧的相对影响。
Genetics. 2022 Jan 4;220(1). doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyab205.
4
Coevolution trumps pleiotropy: carbon assimilation traits are independent of metabolic network structure in budding yeast.共进化胜过多效性:出芽酵母的碳同化性状与代谢网络结构无关。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054403. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
5
Testing the neutral hypothesis of phenotypic evolution.检验表型进化的中性假说。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 14;114(46):12219-12224. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710351114. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
6
Antagonistic coevolution between quantitative and Mendelian traits.数量性状与孟德尔性状之间的拮抗协同进化
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Mar 30;283(1827):20152926. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2926.
7
Genetic complexity and quantitative trait loci mapping of yeast morphological traits.酵母形态特征的遗传复杂性与数量性状基因座定位
PLoS Genet. 2007 Feb 23;3(2):e31. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030031.
8
Extent and context dependence of pleiotropy revealed by high-throughput single-cell phenotyping.高通量单细胞表型分析揭示的表型多效性的程度和上下文依赖性。
PLoS Biol. 2020 Aug 17;18(8):e3000836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000836. eCollection 2020 Aug.
9
A broad mutational target explains a fast rate of phenotypic evolution.广泛的突变靶标解释了表型进化的快速速率。
Elife. 2020 Aug 27;9:e54928. doi: 10.7554/eLife.54928.
10
The contribution of mutation and selection to multivariate quantitative genetic variance in an outbred population of .突变和选择对异交群体中多维数量遗传方差的贡献。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 3;118(31). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2026217118.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting natural variation in the yeast phenotypic landscape with machine learning.利用机器学习预测酵母表型景观中的自然变异。
Mol Syst Biol. 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1038/s44320-025-00136-y.
2
Alternative Mutational Architectures Producing Identical M-Matrices can Lead to Different Patterns of Evolutionary Divergence.产生相同M矩阵的替代突变结构可导致不同的进化分歧模式。
Genome Biol Evol. 2025 May 30;17(6). doi: 10.1093/gbe/evaf099.

本文引用的文献

1
The contribution of mutation and selection to multivariate quantitative genetic variance in an outbred population of .突变和选择对异交群体中多维数量遗传方差的贡献。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 3;118(31). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2026217118.
2
Correlational selection in the age of genomics.基因组学时代的关联选择。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 May;5(5):562-573. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01413-3. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
3
Extent and context dependence of pleiotropy revealed by high-throughput single-cell phenotyping.高通量单细胞表型分析揭示的表型多效性的程度和上下文依赖性。
PLoS Biol. 2020 Aug 17;18(8):e3000836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000836. eCollection 2020 Aug.
4
Metamorphosis shapes cranial diversity and rate of evolution in salamanders.变形改变了蝾螈的颅形多样性和进化速度。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Aug;4(8):1129-1140. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1225-3. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
5
The consequences of craniofacial integration for the adaptive radiations of Darwin's finches and Hawaiian honeycreepers.颅面整合对达尔文雀和夏威夷蜜雀适应辐射的影响。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Feb;4(2):270-278. doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-1092-y. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
6
Empirical measures of mutational effects define neutral models of regulatory evolution in .经验测量突变效应对 调控进化的中性模型的定义。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 15;116(42):21085-21093. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1902823116. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
7
Ecomorphological diversification in squamates from conserved pattern of cranial integration.从颅面整合的保守模式看有鳞目动物的生态形态多样性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jul 16;116(29):14688-14697. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820967116. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
8
Why does allometry evolve so slowly?为什么异速生长进化得如此缓慢?
Integr Comp Biol. 2019 Nov 1;59(5):1429-1440. doi: 10.1093/icb/icz099.
9
Revisiting a Key Innovation in Evolutionary Biology: Felsenstein's "Phylogenies and the Comparative Method".重温进化生物学的一个关键创新:费雪斯坦的“系统发育与比较方法”。
Am Nat. 2019 Jun;193(6):755-772. doi: 10.1086/703055. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
10
The origin and maintenance of metabolic allometry in animals.动物代谢异速生长的起源和维持。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Apr;3(4):598-603. doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-0839-9. Epub 2019 Mar 18.