• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

没有证据表明在白垩纪-古近纪(K-Pg)之交发生过被子植物大灭绝。

No phylogenetic evidence for angiosperm mass extinction at the Cretaceous-Palaeogene (K-Pg) boundary.

机构信息

The Milner Centre for Evolution, Department of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico.

出版信息

Biol Lett. 2023 Sep;19(9):20230314. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0314. Epub 2023 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2023.0314
PMID:37700701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10498348/
Abstract

The Cretaceous-Palaeogene mass extinction event (K-Pg) witnessed upwards of 75% of animal species going extinct, most notably among these are the non-avian dinosaurs. A major question in macroevolution is whether this extinction event influenced the rise of flowering plants (angiosperms). The fossil record suggests that the K-Pg event had a strong regional impact on angiosperms with up to 75% species extinctions, but only had a minor impact on the extinction rates of major lineages (families and orders). Phylogenetic evidence for angiosperm extinction dynamics through time remains unexplored. By analysing two angiosperm mega-phylogenies containing approximately 32 000-73 000 extant species, here we show relatively constant extinction rates throughout geological time and no evidence for a mass extinction at the K-Pg boundary. Despite high species-level extinction observed in the fossil record, our results support the macroevolutionary resilience of angiosperms to the K-Pg mass extinction event via survival of higher lineages.

摘要

白垩纪-古近纪灭绝事件(K-Pg)见证了超过 75%的动物物种灭绝,其中最显著的是非鸟类恐龙。宏观进化的一个主要问题是,这次灭绝事件是否影响了开花植物(被子植物)的兴起。化石记录表明,K-Pg 事件对被子植物有强烈的区域性影响,多达 75%的物种灭绝,但对主要谱系(科和目)的灭绝率只有较小的影响。通过时间对被子植物灭绝动态的系统发育证据仍未得到探索。通过分析包含大约 32000-73000 个现存物种的两个被子植物 mega 系统发育,我们在这里表明,在地质时间内灭绝率相对稳定,没有证据表明 K-Pg 边界发生了大规模灭绝。尽管在化石记录中观察到了高物种水平的灭绝,但我们的结果支持了被子植物通过较高谱系的生存对 K-Pg 大灭绝事件的宏观进化弹性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa0f/10498348/efb56e7af87e/rsbl20230314f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa0f/10498348/efb56e7af87e/rsbl20230314f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa0f/10498348/efb56e7af87e/rsbl20230314f01.jpg

相似文献

1
No phylogenetic evidence for angiosperm mass extinction at the Cretaceous-Palaeogene (K-Pg) boundary.没有证据表明在白垩纪-古近纪(K-Pg)之交发生过被子植物大灭绝。
Biol Lett. 2023 Sep;19(9):20230314. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0314. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
2
The meaning of mass extinctions and what the fossil record tells us about angiosperm survival at K-Pg: a reply to Hagen (2024).大灭绝的意义以及化石记录告诉我们被子植物在 K-Pg 时期的生存情况:对 Hagen(2024)的回复。
Biol Lett. 2024 Aug;20(8):20240265. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0265. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
3
If Dung Beetles (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) Arose in Association with Dinosaurs, Did They Also Suffer a Mass Co-Extinction at the K-Pg Boundary?如果蜣螂(金龟科:蜣螂亚科)是与恐龙同时出现的,它们在白垩纪-古近纪界线处也经历了大规模的共同灭绝吗?
PLoS One. 2016 May 4;11(5):e0153570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153570. eCollection 2016.
4
Adaptive radiation of multituberculate mammals before the extinction of dinosaurs.多瘤齿兽类哺乳动物在恐龙灭绝前的辐射适应。
Nature. 2012 Mar 14;483(7390):457-60. doi: 10.1038/nature10880.
5
Eutherians experienced elevated evolutionary rates in the immediate aftermath of the Cretaceous-Palaeogene mass extinction.在白垩纪-古近纪大灭绝之后不久,真兽类经历了进化速率的提升。
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Jun 29;283(1833). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.3026.
6
Diversification dynamics of mammalian clades during the K-Pg mass extinction.哺乳动物类群在 K-Pg 大灭绝期间的多样化动态。
Biol Lett. 2018 Sep 26;14(9):20180458. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0458.
7
Freshwater fish and the Cretaceous/Palaeogene boundary: a critical assessment of survivorship patterns.淡水鱼类与白垩纪/古近纪之交:对幸存模式的批判性评估。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Aug;291(2029):20241025. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1025. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
8
Origin of horsetails and the role of whole-genome duplication in plant macroevolution.木贼的起源和全基因组复制在植物宏观进化中的作用。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Nov 6;286(1914):20191662. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1662. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
9
Revisiting the origin and diversification of vascular plants through a comprehensive Bayesian analysis of the fossil record.通过对化石记录进行全面的贝叶斯分析来重新审视维管植物的起源和多样化。
New Phytol. 2015 Jul;207(2):425-436. doi: 10.1111/nph.13247. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
10
The Angiosperm Terrestrial Revolution buffered ants against extinction.被子植物的陆地革命使蚂蚁免于灭绝。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 26;121(13):e2317795121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2317795121. Epub 2024 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The stepwise rise of angiosperm-dominated terrestrial ecosystems.被子植物主导的陆地生态系统的逐步兴起。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2025 Oct;100(5):2131-2149. doi: 10.1111/brv.70039. Epub 2025 May 30.
2
The end-Cretaceous plant extinction: Heterogeneity, ecosystem transformation, and insights for the future.白垩纪末期的植物灭绝:异质性、生态系统转变及对未来的启示。
Camb Prism Extinct. 2023 Jun 7;1:e14. doi: 10.1017/ext.2023.13. eCollection 2023.
3
A critique of Thompson and Ramírez-Barahona (2023) or: how I learned to stop worrying and love the fossil record.

本文引用的文献

1
Speciation across the Earth driven by global cooling in terrestrial orchids.地球生物多样性形成受陆地兰花全球降温驱动。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jul 18;120(29):e2102408120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102408120. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
2
Rapidly changing speciation and extinction rates can be inferred in spite of nonidentifiability.尽管无法识别,但仍可以推断出快速变化的物种形成和灭绝速率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Feb 14;120(7):e2208851120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2208851120. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
3
V.PhyloMaker2: An updated and enlarged R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants.
对汤普森和拉米雷斯-巴拉霍纳(2023)的批判:或者,我是如何学会不再担忧并热爱化石记录的。
Biol Lett. 2024 Aug;20(8):20240039. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0039. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
4
The meaning of mass extinctions and what the fossil record tells us about angiosperm survival at K-Pg: a reply to Hagen (2024).大灭绝的意义以及化石记录告诉我们被子植物在 K-Pg 时期的生存情况:对 Hagen(2024)的回复。
Biol Lett. 2024 Aug;20(8):20240265. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0265. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
5
Disparity of cycad leaves dispels the living fossil metaphor.苏铁叶片的歧化现象打破了“活化石”的隐喻。
Commun Biol. 2024 Mar 14;7(1):328. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06024-9.
6
The angiosperm radiation played a dual role in the diversification of insects and insect pollinators.被子植物辐射在昆虫和昆虫传粉媒介的多样化中发挥了双重作用。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jan 22;15(1):552. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44784-4.
7
Angiosperm flowers reached their highest morphological diversity early in their evolutionary history.被子植物的花在其进化历史的早期就达到了最高的形态多样性。
New Phytol. 2024 Feb;241(3):1348-1360. doi: 10.1111/nph.19389. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
V.PhyloMaker2:一个经过更新和扩充的R软件包,可生成用于维管植物的非常大型的系统发育树。
Plant Divers. 2022 May 27;44(4):335-339. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2022.05.005. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
What is the age of flowering plants?开花植物的年龄是多少?
J Exp Bot. 2022 Jun 24;73(12):3840-3853. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac130.
5
The Angiosperm Terrestrial Revolution and the origins of modern biodiversity.被子植物的陆地革命与现代生物多样性的起源
New Phytol. 2022 Mar;233(5):2017-2035. doi: 10.1111/nph.17822. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
6
Diversification dynamics of total-, stem-, and crown-groups are compatible with molecular clock estimates of divergence times.总类群、干群类群和冠群的多样化动态与分化时间的分子钟估计结果相符。
Sci Adv. 2021 Jun 11;7(24). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf2257. Print 2021 Jun.
7
Extinction at the end-Cretaceous and the origin of modern Neotropical rainforests.白垩纪末期的灭绝与现代新热带雨林的起源。
Science. 2021 Apr 2;372(6537):63-68. doi: 10.1126/science.abf1969.
8
The rise of angiosperms pushed conifers to decline during global cooling.被子植物的兴起导致松柏类植物在全球变冷期间衰退。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 17;117(46):28867-28875. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2005571117. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
9
The delayed and geographically heterogeneous diversification of flowering plant families.开花植物科的延迟和地理上不均匀的多样化。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Sep;4(9):1232-1238. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1241-3. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
10
Extant timetrees are consistent with a myriad of diversification histories.现存的时间树与无数的多样化历史是一致的。
Nature. 2020 Apr;580(7804):502-505. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2176-1. Epub 2020 Apr 15.