Qusada Abdulrahman H
Preventive Medicine, Jazan Health Affairs, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia, Jazan, SAU.
Cureus. 2023 Aug 12;15(8):e43382. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43382. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Despite adopting biomedical research ethics rules, regulations, and statements, unethical behavior is pervasive and frequently reported. This study assessed the perception and awareness of research Ethics and Misconduct among the Teaching Staff of Health Colleges at Jazan University, southwest Saudi Arabia.
This research aimed to assess the awareness and perception of research ethics and misconduct among the teaching staff of the health colleges at Jazan University in southwest Saudi Arabia.
Observational cross-sectional study targeted 424 faculty members randomly chosen from health-related colleges at Jazan University. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data using a web-based survey.
The overall level of knowledge about medical ethics indicated that more than half of respondents (57.8%) had a good level of knowledge, 23.4% had a fair level of knowledge, and only 18.4% had poor knowledge. The Saudi National Committee on Bioethics was only known by 49.5% of the study participants. In addition, just 48.3% of respondents knew Saudi Arabia's national standards of ethics and principles for conducting scientific research. The knowledge of research ethics was found to be significantly (P<0.05) higher in participants with higher academic positions, such as professors, MD degree holders, and participants with more extensive work experience. About 48.2% reported that the severity of penalties for scientific misconduct would highly affect scientific integrity, and 74.3% found that their understanding of rules and procedures related to scientific misconduct has a very high effect on scientific integrity. Poor knowledge of research ethics is typically associated with an individual's academic job title, as "lecturer" showed a lower level of knowledge in comparison to other job titles. Even though about 50% of participants in the study had a good understanding of research ethics, it's crucial to ensure that all faculty members have a universal understanding. Therefore, it's essential to implement an appropriate research ethics training program.
尽管采用了生物医学研究伦理规则、条例和声明,但不道德行为仍然普遍存在且屡有报道。本研究评估了沙特阿拉伯西南部吉赞大学健康学院教职员工对研究伦理和不当行为的认知与了解。
本研究旨在评估沙特阿拉伯西南部吉赞大学健康学院教职员工对研究伦理和不当行为的认知与了解。
观察性横断面研究针对从吉赞大学健康相关学院随机选取的424名教职员工。使用结构化问卷通过网络调查收集数据。
医学伦理知识的总体水平表明,超过一半的受访者(57.8%)知识水平良好,23.4%的人知识水平一般,只有18.4%的人知识水平较差。只有49.5%的研究参与者知道沙特国家生物伦理委员会。此外,只有48.3%的受访者了解沙特阿拉伯进行科学研究的国家伦理标准和原则。研究发现,学术职位较高的参与者,如教授、医学博士学位持有者以及工作经验更丰富的参与者,对研究伦理的了解显著更高(P<0.05)。约48.2%的人报告说,对科学不当行为的处罚严厉程度会对科学诚信产生很大影响,74.3%的人发现他们对与科学不当行为相关的规则和程序的理解对科学诚信有很大影响。研究伦理知识匮乏通常与个人的学术职称有关,因为“讲师”与其他职称相比知识水平较低。尽管该研究中约50%的参与者对研究伦理有较好的理解,但确保所有教职员工都有普遍的理解至关重要。因此,实施适当的研究伦理培训计划很有必要。