• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高电子健康记录人工智能模型的公平性:联邦学习方法的案例

Improving Fairness in AI Models on Electronic Health Records: The Case for Federated Learning Methods.

作者信息

Poulain Raphael, Tarek Mirza Farhan Bin, Beheshti Rahmatollah

机构信息

University of Delaware USA.

出版信息

FAccT 23 (2023). 2023 Jun;2023:1599-1608. doi: 10.1145/3593013.3594102. Epub 2023 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1145/3593013.3594102
PMID:37990734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10661580/
Abstract

Developing AI tools that preserve fairness is of critical importance, specifically in high-stakes applications such as those in healthcare. However, health AI models' overall prediction performance is often prioritized over the possible biases such models could have. In this study, we show one possible approach to mitigate bias concerns by having healthcare institutions collaborate through a federated learning paradigm (FL; which is a popular choice in healthcare settings). While FL methods with an emphasis on fairness have been previously proposed, their underlying model and local implementation techniques, as well as their possible applications to the healthcare domain remain widely underinvestigated. Therefore, we propose a comprehensive FL approach with adversarial debiasing and a fair aggregation method, suitable to various fairness metrics, in the healthcare domain where electronic health records are used. Not only our approach explicitly mitigates bias as part of the optimization process, but an FL-based paradigm would also implicitly help with addressing data imbalance and increasing the data size, offering a practical solution for healthcare applications. We empirically demonstrate our method's superior performance on multiple experiments simulating large-scale real-world scenarios and compare it to several baselines. Our method has achieved promising fairness performance with the lowest impact on overall discrimination performance (accuracy). Our code is available at https://github.com/healthylaife/FairFedAvg.

摘要

开发确保公平性的人工智能工具至关重要,特别是在医疗保健等高风险应用领域。然而,健康人工智能模型的整体预测性能往往比此类模型可能存在的偏差更受重视。在本研究中,我们展示了一种可能的方法,即通过让医疗机构通过联邦学习范式(FL;这是医疗保健环境中的一种常用选择)进行协作,来减轻对偏差的担忧。虽然此前已经提出了强调公平性的FL方法,但其基础模型和本地实施技术,以及它们在医疗保健领域的可能应用仍未得到充分研究。因此,我们提出了一种全面的FL方法,该方法具有对抗性去偏和公平聚合方法,适用于使用电子健康记录的医疗保健领域中的各种公平性指标。我们的方法不仅在优化过程中明确减轻了偏差,而且基于FL的范式还将在隐式层面上有助于解决数据不平衡问题并增加数据量,为医疗保健应用提供了切实可行的解决方案。我们通过模拟大规模现实场景的多项实验,实证证明了我们方法的卓越性能,并将其与多个基线进行了比较。我们的方法在对整体歧视性能(准确性)影响最小的情况下,实现了令人满意的公平性表现。我们的代码可在https://github.com/healthylaife/FairFedAvg获取。

相似文献

1
Improving Fairness in AI Models on Electronic Health Records: The Case for Federated Learning Methods.提高电子健康记录人工智能模型的公平性:联邦学习方法的案例
FAccT 23 (2023). 2023 Jun;2023:1599-1608. doi: 10.1145/3593013.3594102. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
2
Analyzing the Impact of Personalization on Fairness in Federated Learning for Healthcare.分析个性化对医疗保健联邦学习公平性的影响。
J Healthc Inform Res. 2024 Mar 23;8(2):181-205. doi: 10.1007/s41666-024-00164-7. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Unified fair federated learning for digital healthcare.用于数字医疗保健的统一公平联邦学习
Patterns (N Y). 2023 Dec 28;5(1):100907. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100907. eCollection 2024 Jan 12.
4
Architectural Design of a Blockchain-Enabled, Federated Learning Platform for Algorithmic Fairness in Predictive Health Care: Design Science Study.区块链赋能的联邦学习平台的架构设计用于预测性医疗保健中的算法公平性:设计科学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 30;25:e46547. doi: 10.2196/46547.
5
Federated Adversarial Debiasing for Fair and Transferable Representations.用于公平且可转移表示的联邦对抗去偏
KDD. 2021 Aug;2021:617-627. doi: 10.1145/3447548.3467281. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
6
A survey of recent methods for addressing AI fairness and bias in biomedicine.生物医学中解决人工智能公平性和偏见问题的最新方法综述。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Jun;154:104646. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104646. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
7
A survey of recent methods for addressing AI fairness and bias in biomedicine.近期解决生物医学中人工智能公平性和偏差问题的方法综述。
ArXiv. 2024 Feb 13:arXiv:2402.08250v1.
8
A scoping review of fair machine learning techniques when using real-world data.使用真实世界数据时公平机器学习技术的范围综述。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Mar;151:104622. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104622. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
9
Unmasking bias in artificial intelligence: a systematic review of bias detection and mitigation strategies in electronic health record-based models.揭开人工智能中的偏见:基于电子健康记录模型的偏见检测和缓解策略的系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Apr 19;31(5):1172-1183. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae060.
10
Unmasking bias in artificial intelligence: a systematic review of bias detection and mitigation strategies in electronic health record-based models.揭示人工智能中的偏见:基于电子健康记录模型的偏见检测与缓解策略的系统评价
ArXiv. 2024 Jul 1:arXiv:2310.19917v3.

引用本文的文献

1
Lessons from complex systems science for AI governance.复杂系统科学对人工智能治理的启示。
Patterns (N Y). 2025 Aug 1;6(8):101341. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2025.101341. eCollection 2025 Aug 8.
2
A decade of review in global regulation and research of artificial intelligence medical devices (2015-2025).全球人工智能医疗设备监管与研究十年回顾(2015 - 2025年)
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 17;12:1630408. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1630408. eCollection 2025.
3
Demographic inaccuracies and biases in the depiction of patients by artificial intelligence text-to-image generators.

本文引用的文献

1
Few-Shot Learning with Semi-Supervised Transformers for Electronic Health Records.用于电子健康记录的基于半监督变压器的少样本学习
Proc Mach Learn Res. 2022 Aug;182:853-873.
2
Disparate Censorship & Undertesting: A Source of Label Bias in Clinical Machine Learning.不同的审查与检测不足:临床机器学习中标签偏差的一个来源。
Proc Mach Learn Res. 2022 Aug;182:343-390.
3
Federated Adversarial Debiasing for Fair and Transferable Representations.用于公平且可转移表示的联邦对抗去偏
人工智能文本到图像生成器在描绘患者时的人口统计学不准确和偏差。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 19;8(1):459. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01817-6.
4
Explainability in the age of large language models for healthcare.大型语言模型时代医疗保健领域的可解释性。
Commun Eng. 2025 Jul 17;4(1):128. doi: 10.1038/s44172-025-00453-y.
5
A scoping review and evidence gap analysis of clinical AI fairness.临床人工智能公平性的范围综述与证据差距分析
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jun 14;8(1):360. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01667-2.
6
Exploring the occupational biases and stereotypes of Chinese large language models.探索中国大语言模型的职业偏见与刻板印象。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 29;15(1):18777. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03893-w.
7
AI-driven healthcare: Fairness in AI healthcare: A survey.人工智能驱动的医疗保健:人工智能医疗保健中的公平性:一项调查。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 May 20;4(5):e0000864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000864. eCollection 2025 May.
8
On the conversational persuasiveness of GPT-4.论GPT-4的对话说服力。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 May 19. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02194-6.
9
Aligning AI principles and healthcare delivery organization best practices to navigate the shifting regulatory landscape.使人工智能原则与医疗保健服务组织的最佳实践保持一致,以应对不断变化的监管环境。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 14;8(1):278. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01605-2.
10
Enhancing supermarket robot interaction: an equitable multi-level LLM conversational interface for handling diverse customer intents.增强超市机器人交互:一种用于处理不同客户意图的公平多层次大语言模型对话界面。
Front Robot AI. 2025 Apr 29;12:1576348. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1576348. eCollection 2025.
KDD. 2021 Aug;2021:617-627. doi: 10.1145/3447548.3467281. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
4
Peeking into a black box, the fairness and generalizability of a MIMIC-III benchmarking model.窥视黑箱:MIMIC-III 基准测试模型的公平性和泛化能力
Sci Data. 2022 Jan 24;9(1):24. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-01110-7.
5
Federated Learning of Electronic Health Records to Improve Mortality Prediction in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Machine Learning Approach.用于改善COVID-19住院患者死亡率预测的电子健康记录联邦学习:机器学习方法。
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Jan 27;9(1):e24207. doi: 10.2196/24207.
6
Federated Learning for Healthcare Informatics.医疗信息学中的联邦学习
J Healthc Inform Res. 2021;5(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s41666-020-00082-4. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
7
Patient clustering improves efficiency of federated machine learning to predict mortality and hospital stay time using distributed electronic medical records.患者聚类提高了联邦机器学习的效率,可使用分布式电子病历预测死亡率和住院时间。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Nov;99:103291. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103291. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
8
Multitask learning and benchmarking with clinical time series data.多任务学习与临床时间序列数据的基准测试。
Sci Data. 2019 Jun 17;6(1):96. doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0103-9.
9
Ensuring Fairness in Machine Learning to Advance Health Equity.确保机器学习的公正性,以促进健康公平。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Dec 18;169(12):866-872. doi: 10.7326/M18-1990. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
10
The eICU Collaborative Research Database, a freely available multi-center database for critical care research.eICU 协作研究数据库,一个免费的多中心重症监护研究数据库。
Sci Data. 2018 Sep 11;5:180178. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.178.