Gumustepe Lale, Kurt Nevriye, Aydın Ebru, Ozkan Gulcan
Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Suleyman Demirel University Isparta Turkey.
Food Sci Nutr. 2023 Jul 6;11(9):5609-5620. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3556. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Avocado tree pruning activities generate a substantial amount of residual biomass, which includes different parts of the plant, such as leaves, twigs, branches, and small fruits. This study aimed to investigate the impact of different green extraction methods of microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and ohmic heating-assisted extraction (OHAE) for the phenolic extraction of avocado leaves based on a statistical approach, central composite design (CCD), and response surface methodology (RSM). Water was preferred using as an environmentally and health-friendly solvent for both methods. The phenolic composition, antioxidant activity, and antidiabetic potential of the extracts were identified and comparatively assessed. The developed models exhibited a high degree of reliability with optimal conditions for OHAE and MAE, which were determined as 9.38 V/cm voltage gradient, 6 min extraction time, at 60°C, 5 min, and 1 g dried leaf/100 mL water. Epicatechin was identified as the primary phenolic compound in OHAE extracts, while chlorogenic acid was the dominant compound in MAE extracts. The extracts obtained from OHAE and MAE were tested for their ability to inhibit α-glucosidase activity, with IC (mg/mL) values of 0.85 and 1.14, respectively. The DPPH radicals scavenging activity (IC mg/L) of OHAE and MAE were detected as 2.96 and 3.41, respectively. In conclusion, both methods yielded extracts rich in polyphenols that displayed high antioxidant activity, but OHAE was found to be superior to MAE in terms of TPC, DPPH, and antidiabetic activities. The results of this study have the potential to make significant contributions toward promoting the principles of a circular economy by facilitating the valorization of the avocado pruning waste.
鳄梨树修剪活动会产生大量残余生物质,其中包括植物的不同部分,如树叶、嫩枝、树枝和小果实。本研究旨在基于统计方法、中心复合设计(CCD)和响应面方法(RSM),研究微波辅助萃取(MAE)和欧姆加热辅助萃取(OHAE)这两种不同绿色萃取方法对鳄梨叶酚类物质萃取的影响。两种方法均首选水作为环保且对健康无害的溶剂。对提取物的酚类成分、抗氧化活性和抗糖尿病潜力进行了鉴定和比较评估。所建立的模型在OHAE和MAE的最佳条件下具有高度可靠性,确定的最佳条件为:电压梯度9.38 V/cm、萃取时间6分钟、温度60°C、5分钟以及1克干叶/100毫升水。表儿茶素被确定为OHAE提取物中的主要酚类化合物,而绿原酸是MAE提取物中的主要化合物。对OHAE和MAE获得的提取物进行了抑制α-葡萄糖苷酶活性的测试,IC(毫克/毫升)值分别为0.85和1.14。检测到OHAE和MAE的DPPH自由基清除活性(IC毫克/升)分别为2.96和3.41。总之,两种方法都得到了富含多酚的提取物,这些提取物具有较高的抗氧化活性,但在总酚含量、DPPH和抗糖尿病活性方面,OHAE被发现优于MAE。本研究结果有可能通过促进鳄梨修剪废弃物的价值化,为推动循环经济原则做出重大贡献。