Lee Bo Mi, Kim Sung-Wan, Lee Bong Ju, Won Seung-Hee, Park Yong-Han, Kang Chae Yeong, Li Ling, Rami Fatima Zahra, Chung Young-Chul
Department of Psychiatry, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, 54907, Republic of Korea.
Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, 54907, Republic of Korea.
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2023 Sep 13;9(1):57. doi: 10.1038/s41537-023-00391-8.
Virtual reality (VR) technology can be a supporting tool to enhance mindfulness. Recently, many research using VR-based mindfulness (VBM) has been carried out in various psychiatric disorders but not in psychosis. We investigated safety and effects of virtual reality-based mindfulness (VBM) in patients with psychosis as a pilot study. Sixty-four patients were randomly assigned to VBM or to VR control. For VBM, education and meditation videos were provided. For VR control, 3-dimensional natural scenes were shown. Both programs consisted of 8 weekly sessions, each lasting about 30 min. Pre- and post-assessments were performed using the experiences questionnaire (EQ), psychotic symptom rating scales-delusion (PSYRATS-D), PSYRATS-auditory hallucinations (AH), motivation and pleasure scale-self rating (MAP-SR) and etc. The safety questionnaire was also surveyed after 1st and 8th session. Physiological measures such as skin conductance level (SCL), heart rate (HR) and RR interval, were collected during the VR interventions. Limited individuals participated in the safety questionnaire and physiological measures. All the results were presented in mean and standard deviation. We did not observe significant results in group x time interaction and main effects of group and time in the decentering and clinical scales. However, within group comparison showed that patients randomized to VBM showed increased decentering (p = 0.029) and decreased amount (p = 0.032) and duration of preoccupation (p = 0.016) in the PSYRATS-D. For the feelings and motivations about close caring relationships of the MAP-SR, we observed a significant group x time interaction (p = 0.027). The frequency of VR sickness was high but its severity was mild. There were significant differences only in HR over time in the VBM group (p = 0.01). These results suggest that VBM was not more effective in reducing decentering and psychiatric symptoms than VR control but its adversity was modest.
虚拟现实(VR)技术可以成为增强正念的一种辅助工具。最近,许多基于虚拟现实的正念(VBM)研究已在各种精神疾病中开展,但尚未在精神病中进行。作为一项试点研究,我们调查了基于虚拟现实的正念(VBM)对精神病患者的安全性和效果。64名患者被随机分配到VBM组或VR对照组。对于VBM组,提供教育和冥想视频。对于VR对照组,展示三维自然场景。两个项目均包括每周8次课程,每次持续约30分钟。使用体验问卷(EQ)、精神病症状评定量表 - 妄想(PSYRATS - D)、PSYRATS - 幻听(AH)、动机与愉悦量表 - 自评(MAP - SR)等进行前后评估。在第1次和第8次课程后还进行了安全问卷调查。在VR干预期间收集生理指标,如皮肤电导率水平(SCL)、心率(HR)和RR间期。只有有限的个体参与了安全问卷和生理指标测量。所有结果均以均值和标准差表示。我们在去中心化和临床量表中未观察到组×时间交互作用以及组和时间的主效应的显著结果。然而,组内比较显示,随机分配到VBM组的患者在PSYRATS - D中去中心化增加(p = 0.029),关注的数量(p = 0.032)和持续时间(p = 0.016)减少。对于MAP - SR中关于亲密关怀关系的感受和动机,我们观察到显著的组×时间交互作用(p = 0.027)。VR晕动症的发生率较高但其严重程度较轻。仅VBM组的HR随时间存在显著差异(p = 0.01)。这些结果表明,VBM在减少去中心化和精神症状方面并不比VR对照组更有效,但其不良影响较小。