• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对虚拟内群体或外群体成员的信任取决于感知到的自我-他人重叠。

Trust in virtual ingroup or outgroup members relies on perceived self-other overlap.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Personality and Cognition, Faculty of Psychological Science, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Aug;77(8):1581-1594. doi: 10.1177/17470218231203203. Epub 2023 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1177/17470218231203203
PMID:37706293
Abstract

Why do we trust each other? We carried out three experiments to test whether interpersonal trust depends on perceived self-other overlap. As previous studies suggest that enfacing (feeling ownership for, and include more into oneself of the face of) an avatar might make one trust this avatar more, we exposed participants to faces of ingroup and outgroup avatars that moved in synchrony or out of synchrony with the participant's own facial movements, and assessed the impact of synchrony on self-other overlap and trust measures. Experiment 1 used ingroup faces and successfully showed that synchrony (manipulated within-participants) increased self-other overlap and trust, which we assessed by means of the Trust Game and the Implicit Association Test (IAT). In Experiment 2, which used outgroup faces and a within-participants design, synchrony still increased scores in the Trust Game but the IAT was no longer affected. Experiment 3 replicated Experiment 2 but with synchrony varying between participants, which eliminated the synchrony effect in both trust measures. Importantly, Inclusion of Other in the Self (IOS) ratings were found to predict the IAT effect in synchronous conditions. Taken altogether, our findings suggest that interpersonal trust is mainly driven by perceived self-other overlap. Besides group identification, appearance, and voluntary movement, synchrony is just one of several sources contributing to perceived self-other overlap.

摘要

为什么我们会彼此信任?我们进行了三项实验来测试人际信任是否取决于感知的自我-他人重叠。由于之前的研究表明,面对(对自己的面孔产生所有权,并将更多的自我包含在面孔中)一个化身可能会使人们更信任这个化身,我们让参与者面对与自己面部动作同步或不同步的内群体和外群体化身的面孔,并评估同步性对自我-他人重叠和信任措施的影响。实验 1 使用内群体面孔,并成功表明同步性(在参与者内部进行操纵)增加了自我-他人重叠和信任,我们通过信任游戏和内隐联想测验(IAT)来评估。在实验 2 中,我们使用了外群体面孔和参与者内设计,同步性仍然增加了信任游戏的分数,但 IAT 不再受到影响。实验 3 复制了实验 2,但同步性在参与者之间变化,这消除了两种信任措施中的同步性效应。重要的是,自我包含他人(IOS)的评分被发现可以预测同步条件下的 IAT 效应。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,人际信任主要是由感知的自我-他人重叠驱动的。除了群体认同、外貌和自愿运动,同步性只是导致感知自我-他人重叠的几个来源之一。

相似文献

1
Trust in virtual ingroup or outgroup members relies on perceived self-other overlap.对虚拟内群体或外群体成员的信任取决于感知到的自我-他人重叠。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Aug;77(8):1581-1594. doi: 10.1177/17470218231203203. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
2
Corralling the ingroup: deviant derogation and perception of group variability.拉拢内群体:偏差诋毁与群体可变性感知。
J Soc Psychol. 2013 May-Jun;153(3):334-50. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2012.738260.
3
The black sheep effect: The case of the deviant ingroup robot.黑羊效应:离经叛道的群体机器人案例。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 16;14(10):e0222975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222975. eCollection 2019.
4
Personality assimilation across species: enfacing an ape reduces own intelligence and increases emotion attribution to apes.跨物种的人格同化:面对一只猿会降低自身智力,并增加对猿的情感归因。
Psychol Res. 2019 Mar;83(2):373-383. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1048-x. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
5
Contextual blending of ingroup/outgroup face stimuli and word valence: LPP modulation and convergence of measures.内群体/外群体面部刺激与词汇效价的情境融合:LPP调制与测量的收敛
BMC Neurosci. 2009 Jun 26;10:69. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-69.
6
Blinding trust: the effect of perceived group victimhood on intergroup trust.盲目信任:感知到的群体受害感对群体间信任的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Jan;39(1):115-27. doi: 10.1177/0146167212466114. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
7
Intergroup emotional exchange: Ingroup guilt and outgroup anger increase resource allocation in trust games.群体间情感交流:内群体内疚感和外群体愤怒感会增加信任游戏中的资源分配。
Emotion. 2019 Jun;19(4):605-616. doi: 10.1037/emo0000463. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
8
Visualizing minimal ingroup and outgroup faces: implications for impressions, attitudes, and behavior.可视化最小内群体和外群体面孔:对印象、态度和行为的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jun;106(6):897-911. doi: 10.1037/a0036498.
9
Collective synchrony increases prosociality towards non-performers and outgroup members.集体同步性会增强对非表现者和外群体成员的亲社会行为。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2016 Dec;55(4):722-738. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12165. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
10
Mood migration: How enfacing a smile makes you happier.情绪迁移:直面微笑如何让你更快乐。
Cognition. 2016 Jun;151:52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.018. Epub 2016 Mar 10.