Suppr超能文献

主动脉瓣狭窄患者的动脉血压正常化并不能预防体外循环前经食管超声心动图与经胸超声心动图之间的分级差异。

Normalizing arterial blood pressure in patients with aortic stenosis does not prevent grading discrepancies between pre-cardiopulmonary bypass transesophageal echocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.

Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.

出版信息

Ann Card Anaesth. 2023 Apr-Jun;26(2):183-189. doi: 10.4103/aca.aca_68_22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aortic stenosis (AS) grading discrepancies exist between pre-cardiopulmonary (pre-CPB) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Prior studies have not systematically controlled blood pressure.

AIMS

We hypothesized that normalizing arterial blood pressure during pre-CPB TEE for patients undergoing valve replacement for AS would result in equivalent grading measurements when compared to TTE.

SETTING

Single University Hospital.

DESIGN

Prospective, Interventional.

METHODS

Thirty-five adult patients underwent procedures for valvular AS between February 2017 and December 2020 at Medical University of South Carolina. Study participants had a TTE within 90 days of their procedure that documented blood pressure, peak velocity (V), mean gradient (PG), aortic valve area (AVA), and dimensionless index (DI). During pre-CPB TEE, if a patient's mean arterial pressure (MAP) fell more than 20% below their baseline blood pressure obtained during TTE, measurements were recorded as "out of range." Phenylephrine was administered to restore MAP to the baseline range and repeat TEE measurements were recorded as "in-range."

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Differences between imaging modalities and grading parameters were examined using a series of linear mixed models. P values were Bonferroni-adjusted to account for multiple comparisons.

MAIN RESULTS

Significant discrepancies between TEE and TTE were observed for V, PG, and DI despite blood pressure normalization across all subjects and for out-of-range measures and corrected measures. There were no statistically significant differences between TEE and TTE for AVA.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood pressure normalization during pre-CPB TEE is not sufficient to avoid AS grading discrepancies with preoperative TTE.

摘要

背景

在心肺预充前经食管超声心动图(pre-CPB TEE)与术前经胸超声心动图(TTE)检查主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)分级存在差异。既往研究并未系统控制血压。

目的

我们假设在接受 AS 瓣膜置换术的患者中,在心肺预充前 TEE 期间使动脉血压正常化,与 TTE 相比,将导致分级测量结果相当。

设置

单所大学医院。

设计

前瞻性、干预性。

方法

2017 年 2 月至 2020 年 12 月,南卡罗来纳医科大学对 35 例成人患者进行了瓣膜性 AS 手术。研究参与者在手术前 90 天内进行了 TTE,记录了血压、峰值速度(V)、平均梯度(PG)、主动脉瓣面积(AVA)和无量纲指数(DI)。在心肺预充前 TEE 期间,如果患者的平均动脉压(MAP)比 TTE 获得的基线血压下降超过 20%,则测量结果将记录为“超出范围”。给予去氧肾上腺素以将 MAP 恢复至基线范围,并记录重复 TEE 测量值为“在范围内”。

统计学分析

使用一系列线性混合模型检查了两种成像方式和分级参数之间的差异。为了考虑多次比较,p 值进行了 Bonferroni 校正。

主要结果

尽管所有患者的血压均得到了正常化,并且对于超出范围的测量值和校正后的测量值,仍观察到 TEE 与 TTE 之间在 V、PG 和 DI 方面存在显著差异。TEE 与 TTE 之间在 AVA 方面无统计学差异。

结论

在心肺预充前 TEE 期间进行血压正常化不足以避免与术前 TTE 相关的 AS 分级差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/397b/10284490/012e584456d1/ACA-26-183-g001.jpg

相似文献

6
Aortic valve area calculation using 3D transesophageal echocardiography: Implications for aortic stenosis severity grading.
Echocardiography. 2020 Dec;37(12):2071-2081. doi: 10.1111/echo.14883. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

本文引用的文献

7
Doppler Imaging in Aortic Stenosis: The Importance of the Nonapical Imaging Windows to Determine Severity in a Contemporary Cohort.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jul;28(7):780-5. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.02.016. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
10
The clinical implications of isolated alpha(1) adrenergic stimulation.
Anesth Analg. 2011 Aug;113(2):297-304. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182120ca5. Epub 2011 Apr 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验