• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经胸与经食管超声心动图对择期主动脉瓣置换手术成年患者主动脉狭窄分级的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Comparison of grading of aortic stenosis between transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in adult patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement surgeries: A prospective observational study.

作者信息

Nanditha S, Malik Vishwas, Hasija Suruchi, Malhotra Poonam, Sreenivas V, Chauhan Sandeep

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Anesthesia, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.

Department of Biostatistics, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Ann Card Anaesth. 2019 Apr-Jun;22(2):194-198. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_4_18.

DOI:10.4103/aca.ACA_4_18
PMID:30971602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6489395/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Intraoperative trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been found to underestimate severity of aortic stenosis (AS) compared to trans-thoracic echo (TTE). We conducted a prospective study comparing pre induction TTE and intra operative TEE grading of AS in patients posted for aortic valve replacement surgeries.

METHODS

Sixty patients with isolated AS who were undergoing aortic valve replacement were enrolled in our study. Baseline TTE was done and after induction of anesthesia, TEE was done. Mean gradient across aortic valve, peak jet velocity, aortic valve area (AVA) by continuity equation and dimensionless index (DI) were assessed in both.

RESULTS

Mean gradient decreased from 56.4 in TTE to 39.8 mm Hg in TEE leading to underestimation of AS in 74.5% of patients (P < 0.0). Mean of peak jet velocity also decreased from 500 in TTE to 386cm/s in TEE (P < 0.01). In 76 % of patients this led to reduction of AS grade from severe to moderate. Mean AVA was 0.67 cm in TTE and 0.69 cm in TEE. Though there was 0.02 cm increase, it was not statistically significant (P = 0.07). All the patients remained as severe AS in TEE. DI mean was 0.19 in both TTE and TEE (P = 0.14).It led to underestimation of severity in 6% of patients in TEE.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that AVA measurement by continuity equation and DI are reliable in grading aortic stenosis while performing intraoperative TEE. Mean gradient and jet velocity can be significantly reduced.

摘要

引言

与经胸超声心动图(TTE)相比,术中经食管超声心动图(TEE)已被发现会低估主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)的严重程度。我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,比较接受主动脉瓣置换手术患者术前诱导期TTE和术中TEE对AS的分级。

方法

60例接受主动脉瓣置换的孤立性AS患者纳入我们的研究。在麻醉诱导前进行基线TTE检查,麻醉诱导后进行TEE检查。评估两者的主动脉瓣平均压差、峰值射流速度、通过连续方程计算的主动脉瓣面积(AVA)和无因次指数(DI)。

结果

平均压差从TTE时的56.4降至TEE时的39.8 mmHg,导致74.5%的患者AS被低估(P<0.0)。峰值射流速度的平均值也从TTE时的500降至TEE时的386cm/s(P<0.01)。在76%的患者中,这导致AS分级从重度降至中度。TTE时平均AVA为0.67 cm,TEE时为0.69 cm。尽管增加了0.02 cm,但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.07)。在TEE中,所有患者仍为重度AS。TTE和TEE的DI平均值均为0.19(P = 0.14)。在TEE中,6%的患者严重程度被低估。

结论

我们的研究表明,在进行术中TEE时,通过连续方程和DI测量AVA在主动脉瓣狭窄分级中是可靠的。平均压差和射流速度可显著降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4903/6489395/0969e5698416/ACA-22-194-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4903/6489395/5b6a16981e96/ACA-22-194-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4903/6489395/cf6b47b324fa/ACA-22-194-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4903/6489395/a1da3e5e37e9/ACA-22-194-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4903/6489395/0969e5698416/ACA-22-194-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4903/6489395/5b6a16981e96/ACA-22-194-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4903/6489395/cf6b47b324fa/ACA-22-194-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4903/6489395/a1da3e5e37e9/ACA-22-194-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4903/6489395/0969e5698416/ACA-22-194-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of grading of aortic stenosis between transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in adult patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement surgeries: A prospective observational study.经胸与经食管超声心动图对择期主动脉瓣置换手术成年患者主动脉狭窄分级的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2019 Apr-Jun;22(2):194-198. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_4_18.
2
Grading Aortic Stenosis With Mean Gradient and Aortic Valve Area: A Comparison Between Preoperative Transthoracic and Precardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography.利用平均压差和主动脉瓣面积对主动脉瓣狭窄进行分级:术前经胸超声心动图与体外循环前经食管超声心动图的比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Oct;30(5):1254-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 11.
3
Grading Aortic Valve Stenosis With Dimensionless Index During Pre-cardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography: A Comparison With Transthoracic Echocardiography.经体外循环前经食管超声心动图测量无单位主动脉瓣狭窄指数与经胸超声心动图的比较。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Sep;33(9):2376-2384. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.03.046. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
4
Normalizing arterial blood pressure in patients with aortic stenosis does not prevent grading discrepancies between pre-cardiopulmonary bypass transesophageal echocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography.主动脉瓣狭窄患者的动脉血压正常化并不能预防体外循环前经食管超声心动图与经胸超声心动图之间的分级差异。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2023 Apr-Jun;26(2):183-189. doi: 10.4103/aca.aca_68_22.
5
Quantification of aortic valve area: comparison of different methods of echocardiography with 3-D scan of the excised valve.主动脉瓣口面积的定量评估:超声心动图不同方法与切除瓣的 3-D 扫描的对比。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Feb;37(2):529-538. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-02035-9. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
6
Comparison of left ventricular outflow geometry and aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional echocardiography.二维超声心动图与三维超声心动图对主动脉瓣狭窄患者左心室流出道形态及主动脉瓣口面积的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jun 1;109(11):1626-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.01.391. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
7
Quantification of aortic stenosis in mechanically ventilated patients using multiplane transesophageal Doppler echocardiography.使用多平面经食管多普勒超声心动图对机械通气患者的主动脉瓣狭窄进行定量分析。
Chest. 1998 Jul;114(1):94-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.1.94.
8
[Planar determination of the aortic valve area with transesophageal echocardiography with multiplanar probe in patients with aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Comparison with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography].[经食管超声心动图多平面探头在主动脉瓣狭窄和关闭不全患者中平面测定主动脉瓣面积。与经胸多普勒超声心动图的比较]
G Ital Cardiol. 1995 Jul;25(7):851-7.
9
Discordance in Grading Methods of Aortic Stenosis by Pre-Cardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography.体外循环前经食管超声心动图评估主动脉瓣狭窄分级方法的不一致性。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Apr;122(4):953-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001099.
10
Preoperative quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison of 64-slice computed tomography with transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography and size of implanted prosthesis.术前主动脉瓣狭窄的定量评估:64 层 CT 与经食管及经胸超声心动图比较和植入假体的大小。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Feb;28(2):343-52. doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9784-z. Epub 2011 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of flow-independent parameters for grading severity of aortic stenosis using intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography - A prospective observational study.术中经食管超声心动图评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的非流量依赖性参数比较-前瞻性观察研究。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2020 Oct-Dec;23(4):425-428. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_135_19.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of preoperative and intraoperative assessment of aortic stenosis severity by echocardiography.超声心动图评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的术前与术中比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 May 1;118(5):699-704. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex055.
2
Grading Aortic Stenosis With Mean Gradient and Aortic Valve Area: A Comparison Between Preoperative Transthoracic and Precardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography.利用平均压差和主动脉瓣面积对主动脉瓣狭窄进行分级:术前经胸超声心动图与体外循环前经食管超声心动图的比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Oct;30(5):1254-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 11.
3
Discordance in Grading Methods of Aortic Stenosis by Pre-Cardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography.
体外循环前经食管超声心动图评估主动脉瓣狭窄分级方法的不一致性。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Apr;122(4):953-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001099.
4
Relation of Dimensionless Index to Long-Term Outcome in Aortic Stenosis With Preserved LVEF.主动脉瓣狭窄伴射血分数保留的左心室功能的无量纲指数与长期预后的关系。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jul;8(7):766-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.01.023. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
5
Ratio of Acceleration Time to Ejection Time for Assessing Aortic Stenosis Severity.用于评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的加速时间与射血时间之比。
Echocardiography. 2015 Dec;32(12):1754-61. doi: 10.1111/echo.12978. Epub 2015 May 22.
6
Incidence and patterns of valvular heart disease in a tertiary care high-volume cardiac center: a single center experience.一家高容量三级医疗心脏中心的心脏瓣膜病发病率及模式:单中心经验
Indian Heart J. 2014 May-Jun;66(3):320-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
7
2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2014 Jun 10;129(23):e521-643. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000031. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
8
Practice guidelines for perioperative transesophageal echocardiography. An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force on Transesophageal Echocardiography.围手术期经食管超声心动图实践指南。美国麻醉医师协会和心血管麻醉医师协会经食管超声心动图特别工作组的最新报告。
Anesthesiology. 2010 May;112(5):1084-96. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c51e90.
9
Impact of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in cardiac and thoracic aortic surgery: experience in 1011 cases.经食管超声心动图在心脏和胸主动脉手术中的应用:1011 例经验。
J Cardiol. 2009 Oct;54(2):282-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2009.06.001. Epub 2009 Jul 18.
10
Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice.瓣膜狭窄的超声心动图评估:欧洲心脏病学会/美国超声心动图学会临床实践建议
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009 Jan;22(1):1-23; quiz 101-2. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.029.