• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经体外循环前经食管超声心动图测量无单位主动脉瓣狭窄指数与经胸超声心动图的比较。

Grading Aortic Valve Stenosis With Dimensionless Index During Pre-cardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography: A Comparison With Transthoracic Echocardiography.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Sep;33(9):2376-2384. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.03.046. Epub 2019 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2019.03.046
PMID:31097337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7179735/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors hypothesized that grading valvular aortic stenosis (AS) with dimensionless index (DI) during intraoperative pre-cardiopulmonary bypass (pre-CPB) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) would match the grade of AS during preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for the same patients more often than when using peak velocity (V), mean pressure gradient (PG), or aortic valve area (AVA).

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational.

SETTING

Single university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The participants in this study included 123 cardiac surgical patients with any degree of AS, who underwent open cardiac surgery between 2010 and 2016 at the Medical University of South Carolina and had V, PG, AVA, and DI values available from reporting databases or archived imaging.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

When using DI, pre-CPB TEE grading of AS severity was 1 grade higher 21.1% of the time and 1 grade lower 13.0% of the time compared with TTE, for an overall disagreement rate of 34.1%. The overall disagreement rates between pre-CPB TEE and TTE for V, PG, and AVA were 39.8%, 33.3%, and 33.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors could not demonstrate that DI was better than V, PG, or AVA at matching AS grades between intraoperative pre-CPB TEE and preoperative TTE. When DI was used, pre-CPB TEE was more likely to overestimate than underestimate the severity of AS compared with TTE. However, when V or PG was used, pre-CPB TEE was more likely to underestimate the severity of AS compared with TTE. A comprehensive approach without overemphasis on 1 parameter should be used for AS assessment by intraoperative TEE.

摘要

目的

作者假设在体外循环(CPB)前经食管超声心动图(TEE)术中用无量纲指数(DI)对主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)进行分级,与同一患者术前经胸超声心动图(TTE)时的 AS 分级更匹配,而不是使用峰值速度(V)、平均压力梯度(PG)或主动脉瓣面积(AVA)。

设计

回顾性,观察性。

地点

单一大学医院。

参与者

这项研究的参与者包括 123 名患有任何程度 AS 的心脏外科患者,他们于 2010 年至 2016 年期间在南卡罗来纳医科大学接受了开放性心脏手术,并从报告数据库或存档的图像中获得了 V、PG、AVA 和 DI 值。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

使用 DI 时,与 TTE 相比,CPB 前 TEE 对 AS 严重程度的分级有 21.1%的时间高 1 级,有 13.0%的时间低 1 级,总不一致率为 34.1%。CPB 前 TEE 与 TTE 对 V、PG 和 AVA 的总体不一致率分别为 39.8%、33.3%和 33.3%。

结论

作者无法证明 DI 在匹配术中 CPB 前 TEE 和术前 TTE 的 AS 分级方面优于 V、PG 或 AVA。与 TTE 相比,当使用 DI 时,CPB 前 TEE 更有可能高估而不是低估 AS 的严重程度。然而,当使用 V 或 PG 时,CPB 前 TEE 更有可能低估 AS 的严重程度。在评估术中 TEE 时,应采用无过分强调某一参数的综合方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c9/7179735/576d8f2ab974/nihms-1579243-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c9/7179735/4ac21b72aac2/nihms-1579243-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c9/7179735/e840db68dce2/nihms-1579243-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c9/7179735/ff70ff41e266/nihms-1579243-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c9/7179735/576d8f2ab974/nihms-1579243-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c9/7179735/4ac21b72aac2/nihms-1579243-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c9/7179735/e840db68dce2/nihms-1579243-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c9/7179735/ff70ff41e266/nihms-1579243-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c9/7179735/576d8f2ab974/nihms-1579243-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Grading Aortic Valve Stenosis With Dimensionless Index During Pre-cardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography: A Comparison With Transthoracic Echocardiography.经体外循环前经食管超声心动图测量无单位主动脉瓣狭窄指数与经胸超声心动图的比较。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Sep;33(9):2376-2384. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.03.046. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
2
Grading Aortic Stenosis With Mean Gradient and Aortic Valve Area: A Comparison Between Preoperative Transthoracic and Precardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography.利用平均压差和主动脉瓣面积对主动脉瓣狭窄进行分级:术前经胸超声心动图与体外循环前经食管超声心动图的比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Oct;30(5):1254-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 11.
3
Normalizing arterial blood pressure in patients with aortic stenosis does not prevent grading discrepancies between pre-cardiopulmonary bypass transesophageal echocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography.主动脉瓣狭窄患者的动脉血压正常化并不能预防体外循环前经食管超声心动图与经胸超声心动图之间的分级差异。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2023 Apr-Jun;26(2):183-189. doi: 10.4103/aca.aca_68_22.
4
Discordance in Grading Methods of Aortic Stenosis by Pre-Cardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography.体外循环前经食管超声心动图评估主动脉瓣狭窄分级方法的不一致性。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Apr;122(4):953-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001099.
5
Comparison of grading of aortic stenosis between transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in adult patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement surgeries: A prospective observational study.经胸与经食管超声心动图对择期主动脉瓣置换手术成年患者主动脉狭窄分级的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2019 Apr-Jun;22(2):194-198. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_4_18.
6
Assessment of Paravalvular Leak After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Transesophageal Echocardiography Compared With Transthoracic Echocardiography.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后瓣周漏的评估:经食管超声心动图与经胸超声心动图的比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Aug;31(4):1278-1284. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
7
Intraoperative Transesophageal and Postoperative Transthoracic Echocardiographic Evaluation of a Mechanical Heart Valve Prosthesis Implanted at Aortic Position.经胸超声心动图与经食管超声心动图在主动脉瓣位机械心脏瓣膜植入术后的评估。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Apr;32(2):782-789. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
8
[Planar determination of the aortic valve area with transesophageal echocardiography with multiplanar probe in patients with aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Comparison with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography].[经食管超声心动图多平面探头在主动脉瓣狭窄和关闭不全患者中平面测定主动脉瓣面积。与经胸多普勒超声心动图的比较]
G Ital Cardiol. 1995 Jul;25(7):851-7.
9
Comparison of preoperative and intraoperative assessment of aortic stenosis severity by echocardiography.超声心动图评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的术前与术中比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 May 1;118(5):699-704. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex055.
10
Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.主动脉瓣面积评估:多层螺旋CT与电影磁共振成像及经胸和经食管超声心动图的比较
Radiology. 2007 Sep;244(3):745-54. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2443061127. Epub 2007 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Normalizing arterial blood pressure in patients with aortic stenosis does not prevent grading discrepancies between pre-cardiopulmonary bypass transesophageal echocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography.主动脉瓣狭窄患者的动脉血压正常化并不能预防体外循环前经食管超声心动图与经胸超声心动图之间的分级差异。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2023 Apr-Jun;26(2):183-189. doi: 10.4103/aca.aca_68_22.

本文引用的文献

1
Doppler assessment of aortic stenosis: a 25-operator study demonstrating why reading the peak velocity is superior to velocity time integral.多普勒评估主动脉瓣狭窄:25 位操作者的研究表明,为什么峰值速度比速度时间积分更具优势。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Dec 1;19(12):1380-1389. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jex218.
2
Comparison of preoperative and intraoperative assessment of aortic stenosis severity by echocardiography.超声心动图评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的术前与术中比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 May 1;118(5):699-704. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex055.
3
Recommendations on the Echocardiographic Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Focused Update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography.主动脉瓣狭窄的超声心动图评估建议:欧洲心血管影像学会和美国超声心动图学会的重点更新
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Apr;30(4):372-392. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.02.009.
4
Grading Aortic Stenosis With Mean Gradient and Aortic Valve Area: A Comparison Between Preoperative Transthoracic and Precardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography.利用平均压差和主动脉瓣面积对主动脉瓣狭窄进行分级:术前经胸超声心动图与体外循环前经食管超声心动图的比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Oct;30(5):1254-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 11.
5
Discordance in Grading Methods of Aortic Stenosis by Pre-Cardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography.体外循环前经食管超声心动图评估主动脉瓣狭窄分级方法的不一致性。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Apr;122(4):953-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001099.
6
Relation of Dimensionless Index to Long-Term Outcome in Aortic Stenosis With Preserved LVEF.主动脉瓣狭窄伴射血分数保留的左心室功能的无量纲指数与长期预后的关系。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jul;8(7):766-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.01.023. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
7
2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jun 10;63(22):2438-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.537. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
8
Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.组内一致性:kappa 统计量。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82.
9
Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice.瓣膜狭窄的超声心动图评估:欧洲心脏病学会/美国超声心动图学会临床实践建议
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009 Jan;22(1):1-23; quiz 101-2. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.029.
10
Impact of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography on surgical decisions in 12,566 patients undergoing cardiac surgery.术中经食管超声心动图对12566例心脏手术患者手术决策的影响
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Mar;85(3):845-52. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.11.015.