Jia Zi-Yao, Zhu Yi-Di, Wu Xiang-Song, Yang Jing-Xiao, Wu Wen-Guang, Wang Xu-An, He Min, Wang Hui, Yang Lin-Hua, Zhang Jie, Li Xue-Chuan, Zou Lu, Li Huai-Feng, Zhang Fei, Bao Run-Fa, Cui Xu-Ya, Song Xiao-Ling, Chen Wei, Gong Wei, Li Mao-Lan, Liu Ying-Bin
Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, China.
Cancer Med. 2023 Sep;12(18):18861-18871. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6513. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
Three-dimensional visualization preoperative evaluation (3D-VPE) and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) have been suggested to improve outcomes of cancer surgery in patients, yet little is known regarding their clinical benefit in patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC). We hypothesized that the combination of 3D-VPE and ERAS would improve the outcome of patients undergoing surgery for GBC.
This study aimed to determine if 3D-VPE and ERAS can improve the outcomes and overall survival in patients with GBC, establishing a novel patient management strategy for GBC.
A total of 227 patients with GBC were recruited and divided into two groups: those who received traditional treatment between January 2000 and December 2010 (n = 86; the control group) and those who underwent 3D-VPE and ERAS between January 2011 and December 2017 (n = 141). Univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to assess the relationship among disease stages, lymph node invasion, and cell differentiation between the two groups. Cox regression analysis was used to investigate patient survival in these groups.
Patients who underwent 3D-VPE and ERAS showed a significantly higher R0 resection rate (67.4% vs. 20.9%, p < 0.001) and dissected lymph node number (26.6 ± 12.6 vs. 16.3 ± 7.6 p < 0.001) compared to the control group. The median survival was 27.4 months, and the 1- and 3-year survival rates were 84.4% and 29.8%, respectively, in patients who received combined management; in the control cohort, the median survival was 12.7 months, and the 1- and 3-year survival rates were 53.5% and 15.1%, respectively. In addition, some postoperative complications and risk factors were diminished relative to the traditionally treated patients.
The implementation of 3D-VPE and ERAS can significantly improve the prognosis and outcomes of patients with GBC and should be considered for wide use in clinical practice.
三维可视化术前评估(3D-VPE)和术后加速康复(ERAS)已被认为可改善癌症手术患者的预后,但关于它们在胆囊癌(GBC)患者中的临床益处知之甚少。我们假设3D-VPE与ERAS相结合将改善接受GBC手术患者的预后。
本研究旨在确定3D-VPE和ERAS是否能改善GBC患者的预后和总生存期,为GBC建立一种新的患者管理策略。
共招募227例GBC患者,分为两组:2000年1月至2010年12月接受传统治疗的患者(n = 86;对照组)和2011年1月至2017年12月接受3D-VPE和ERAS的患者(n = 141)。采用单因素和多因素分析评估两组疾病分期、淋巴结侵犯和细胞分化之间的关系。采用Cox回归分析研究这些组患者的生存率。
与对照组相比,接受3D-VPE和ERAS的患者R0切除率显著更高(67.4%对20.9%,p < 0.001),清扫淋巴结数量更多(26.6±12.6对16.3±7.6,p < 0.001)。接受联合管理的患者中位生存期为27.4个月,1年和3年生存率分别为84.4%和29.8%;在对照组中,中位生存期为12.7个月,1年和3年生存率分别为53.5%和15.1%。此外,相对于传统治疗的患者,一些术后并发症和危险因素有所减少。
实施3D-VPE和ERAS可显著改善GBC患者的预后和结局,应考虑在临床实践中广泛应用。