Department of Sports Physical Therapy, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey.
Clin J Sport Med. 2024 Jan 1;34(1):10-16. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000001191. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
To investigate the effects of low-load blood flow restriction (BFR) training on shoulder muscle thickness, rotator cuff (RC) strength, and shoulder symptoms in patients with RC tendinopathy.
A randomized, assessor-blinded, controlled trial.
Physiotherapy clinic at a university.
Twenty-eight patients were randomized into an 8-week (2 times/week) shoulder rehabilitation, that is, BFR or non-BFR group.
BFR training.
(1) RC, deltoid, scapula retractor, and biceps muscle thicknesses and shoulder internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) strengths. (2) Shoulder pain/function.
The BFR group had a greater increase in biceps muscle thickness ( P = 0.002) and shoulder IR strength at 60 degrees/s ( P = 0.040) than the non-BFR group. No differences between the 2 groups were observed in other measurements. Significant improvements in supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and scapula retractor muscle thicknesses and in shoulder ER and IR strengths were observed over time in both the groups (all P < 0 .05). Also, shoulder pain decreased and shoulder function increased over time in both the groups (all P < 0 .05).
Low-load BFR training resulted in a greater increase in biceps thickness and shoulder IR strength compared with the non-BFR group in patients with RC tendinopathy. However, there was no superiority of either exercise training regarding the RC, scapula retractor, deltoid muscle thicknesses, or improvements in shoulder ER strength and shoulder pain/function.
The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov named Blood Flow Restriction Training in Patients with Shoulder Pain and the registration number is NCT04333784.
研究低负荷血流限制(BFR)训练对肩袖(RC)疾病患者肩部肌肉厚度、肩袖力量和肩部症状的影响。
随机、评估者盲、对照试验。
大学的物理治疗诊所。
28 名患者被随机分为 8 周(每周 2 次)的肩部康复组,即 BFR 或非 BFR 组。
BFR 训练。
(1)RC、三角肌、肩胛提肌和肱二头肌的厚度以及肩部内旋(IR)和外旋(ER)力量。(2)肩部疼痛/功能。
与非 BFR 组相比,BFR 组的肱二头肌厚度增加更大(P=0.002),60 度/s 时肩部 IR 力量增加更大(P=0.040)。两组间在其他测量指标上无差异。两组患者的冈上肌、冈下肌和肩胛提肌的厚度以及肩部 ER 和 IR 力量均随时间显著改善(均 P<0.05)。两组患者的肩部疼痛均随时间减少,肩部功能均随时间增加(均 P<0.05)。
与非 BFR 组相比,RC 疾病患者接受低负荷 BFR 训练后,肱二头肌厚度和肩部 IR 力量增加更大。然而,在 RC、肩胛提肌、三角肌的厚度或肩部 ER 力量和肩部疼痛/功能的改善方面,两种运动训练均无优势。
该研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册为“肩部疼痛患者的血流限制训练”,注册号为 NCT04333784。