• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

匈牙利人群 15D 通用偏好伴随健康状况衡量指标的正常值。

Hungarian population norms for the 15D generic preference-accompanied health status measure.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy, Corvinus University of Budapest, 8 Fővám tér, 1093, Budapest, Hungary.

Semmelweis University Doctoral School, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2024 Jan;33(1):87-99. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03514-x. Epub 2023 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-023-03514-x
PMID:37707653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10784351/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

15D is a generic preference-accompanied health status measure covering a wide range of health areas, including sensory functions. The aim of this study was to establish population norms for the 15D instrument in Hungary.

METHODS

2000 members of the Hungarian adult general population participated in an online cross-sectional survey in August 2021. The sample was broadly representative in terms of gender, age groups, highest level of education, geographical region, and settlement type. Index values were derived using the Norwegian 15D value set. In addition to providing population norms, mean index values were computed for 32 physical and 24 mental health condition groups.

RESULTS

Most respondents (78.7%) reported problems in at least one 15D domain. The most problems were reported with sleeping (50.7%), followed by vitality (49.2%), distress (43.6%), discomfort and symptoms (31.2%), depression (31.1%), sexual activities (29.6%), breathing (28.1%), and vision (27.8%). The mean 15D index value was 0.810. With advancing age categories, the 15D index values showed an inverse U-shaped curve. Generally, mean index values in respondents with mental health conditions were lower [range 0.299 (post-traumatic stress disorder) to 0.757 (smoking addiction)] than those of respondents with physical conditions [range 0.557 (liver cirrhosis) to 0.764 (allergies)].

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided 15D population norms of the Hungarian general population; furthermore, this is the first study to provide population norms for the 15D in any country. The values established in this study can serve as benchmarks for evaluating efficacy outcomes in clinical trials, quantifying disease burden and identifying unmet needs.

摘要

目的

15D 是一种通用的伴随偏好的健康状况衡量标准,涵盖广泛的健康领域,包括感官功能。本研究的目的是为匈牙利的 15D 工具建立人口规范。

方法

2021 年 8 月,2000 名匈牙利成年普通人群参加了一项在线横断面调查。该样本在性别、年龄组、最高教育水平、地理区域和定居类型方面具有广泛的代表性。指数值是使用挪威 15D 值集得出的。除了提供人口规范外,还为 32 个身体和 24 个心理健康状况组计算了平均指数值。

结果

大多数受访者(78.7%)报告在至少一个 15D 领域存在问题。报告最多问题的是睡眠(50.7%),其次是活力(49.2%)、痛苦(43.6%)、不适和症状(31.2%)、抑郁(31.1%)、性活动(29.6%)、呼吸(28.1%)和视力(27.8%)。平均 15D 指数值为 0.810。随着年龄类别增加,15D 指数值呈反 U 形曲线。一般来说,心理健康状况受访者的平均指数值较低[范围为 0.299(创伤后应激障碍)至 0.757(吸烟成瘾)],而身体状况受访者的平均指数值较高[范围为 0.557(肝硬化)至 0.764(过敏)]。

结论

本研究提供了匈牙利普通人群的 15D 人口规范;此外,这是首次在任何国家提供 15D 人口规范的研究。本研究中建立的这些值可以作为临床试验疗效结果的基准,量化疾病负担和识别未满足的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab38/10784351/fd099311248e/11136_2023_3514_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab38/10784351/10ea78ecd31c/11136_2023_3514_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab38/10784351/e8fa025b490f/11136_2023_3514_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab38/10784351/fd099311248e/11136_2023_3514_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab38/10784351/10ea78ecd31c/11136_2023_3514_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab38/10784351/e8fa025b490f/11136_2023_3514_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab38/10784351/fd099311248e/11136_2023_3514_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Hungarian population norms for the 15D generic preference-accompanied health status measure.匈牙利人群 15D 通用偏好伴随健康状况衡量指标的正常值。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Jan;33(1):87-99. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03514-x. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
2
The impact of chronic orofacial pain on health-related quality of life.慢性口腔颌面部疼痛对健康相关生活质量的影响。
Scand J Pain. 2020 Apr 28;20(2):329-338. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2019-0131.
3
Patient-reported outcomes in coronary artery disease: the relationship between the standard, disease-specific set by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) and the generic health-related quality of life instrument 15D.冠心病患者报告结局:国际健康结局测量联盟(ICHOM)制定的标准、疾病特异性和通用健康相关生活质量量表 15D 之间的关系。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Aug 28;19(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01841-6.
4
Subjective Well-Being Population Norms and Inequalities in Hungary: A Large Cross-Sectional, Internet-Based Survey.匈牙利的主观幸福感人口规范和不平等:一项大型的基于互联网的横断面调查。
Value Health. 2024 Jul;27(7):837-847. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.04.005. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
5
A Norwegian 15D value algorithm: proposing a new procedure to estimate 15D value algorithms.挪威 15D 值算法:提出一种新的 15D 值算法估计方法。
Qual Life Res. 2019 May;28(5):1129-1143. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2043-9. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
6
Comparison of three health-related quality of life instruments in relation to visual acuity: EQ-5D, 15D, and EUROHIS-QOL8.三种与视力相关的健康相关生活质量工具的比较:EQ-5D、15D 和 EUROHIS-QOL8。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Feb;32(2):543-552. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03293-x. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
7
Comparison between the disease-specific Airways Questionnaire 20 and the generic 15D instruments in COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病中特异性气道问卷 20 与通用 15D 仪器的比较。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Jan 16;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-4.
8
EQ-5D-5L Slovenian population norms.EQ-5D-5L 斯洛文尼亚人群常模。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 7;18(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01584-w.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L: South Australian population norms.使用EQ-5D-5L量表测量的健康相关生活质量:南澳大利亚州人群常模。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Sep 20;14(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0537-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of updated population norms for the SF-36 for Hungary and comparison with 1997-1998 norms.匈牙利SF-36更新版人群常模的制定及与1997 - 1998年常模的比较。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Feb 17;23(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02343-5.
2
Population Norms for the EQ-5D-5L, PROPr and SF-6D in Hungary.匈牙利EQ-5D-5L、PROPr和SF-6D的人群常模。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 May;42(5):583-603. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01360-4. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric properties and general population reference values for PROMIS Global Health in Hungary.匈牙利 PROMIS 全球健康量表的心理测量学特性和一般人群参考值。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Jun;25(4):549-562. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01610-w. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
2
A Direct Comparison of the Measurement Properties of EQ-5D-5L, PROMIS-29+2 and PROMIS Global Health Instruments and EQ-5D-5L and PROPr Utilities in a General Population Sample.在一般人群样本中,EQ-5D-5L、PROMIS-29+2 和 PROMIS 全球健康量表与 EQ-5D-5L 和 PROPr 效用工具的测量特性直接比较。
Value Health. 2023 Jul;26(7):1045-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
3
A head-to-head comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and 15D descriptive systems and index values in a general population sample.
在一般人群样本中,对 EQ-5D-5L 和 15D 描述性系统及其指数值进行头对头比较。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Feb 19;21(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02096-z.
4
Hungarian PROMIS-29+2: psychometric properties and population reference values.匈牙利 PROMIS-29+2:心理计量特性和群体参考值。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Aug;32(8):2179-2194. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03364-7. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
5
Systematic Review of the Effect of a One-Day Versus Seven-Day Recall Duration on Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).一天与七天回忆间隔对患者报告结局测量(PROMs)效果的系统评价。
Patient. 2023 May;16(3):201-221. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00611-w. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
6
Value Set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L in Hungary.匈牙利的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 量表值。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(Suppl 2):205-215. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01190-2. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
7
Analyzing the Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression Composite Domains and the Meaning of Discomfort in the EQ-5D: A Mixed-Methods Study.分析 EQ-5D 中的疼痛/不适和焦虑/抑郁综合领域以及不适的意义:一项混合方法研究。
Value Health. 2022 Dec;25(12):2003-2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.06.012. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
8
Normative data and socio-demographic determinants of the dermatology life quality index in a large online sample of the Hungarian population.在匈牙利人群的一个大型在线样本中,皮肤病生活质量指数的规范数据和社会人口统计学决定因素。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Oct;22(7):1153-1161. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2022.2108793. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
9
The remarkably frequent use of EQ-5D in non-economic research.EQ-5D 在非经济研究中被频繁使用。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Aug;23(6):1007-1014. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01411-z. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
10
Health-related quality of life and mental well-being of healthy and diseased persons in 8 countries: Does stringency of government response against early COVID-19 matter?8个国家中健康人群和患病者的健康相关生活质量及心理健康:政府对早期新冠疫情应对措施的严格程度有影响吗?
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Sep 1;15:100913. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100913. eCollection 2021 Sep.