• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿拉巴马州医疗补助计划覆盖的 2 型糖尿病成年人血糖控制的趋势和预测因素,2011-2019 年。

Trends and Predictors of Glycemic Control Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Covered by Alabama Medicaid, 2011-2019.

机构信息

Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine.

Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1717 11th Ave South, MT-616, Birmingham, AL 35205 (

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Sep 14;20:E81. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.220332.

DOI:10.5888/pcd20.220332
PMID:37708338
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10516203/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite advances in diabetes management, only one-quarter of people with diabetes in the US achieve optimal targets for glycated hemoglobin A (HbA), blood pressure, and cholesterol. We sought to evaluate temporal trends and predictors of achieving glycemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes covered by Alabama Medicaid from 2011 through 2019.

METHODS

We completed a retrospective analysis of Medicaid claims and laboratory data, using person-years as the unit of analysis. Inclusion criteria were being aged 19 to 64 years, having a diabetes diagnosis, being continuously enrolled in Medicaid for a calendar year and preceding 12 months, and having at least 1 HbA result during the study year. Primary outcomes were HbA thresholds of <7% and <8%. Primary exposure was study year. We conducted separate multivariable-adjusted logistic regressions to evaluate relationships between study year and HbA thresholds.

RESULTS

We included 43,997 person-year observations. Mean (SD) age was 51.0 (9.9) years; 69.4% were women; 48.1% were Black, 42.9% White, and 0.4% Hispanic. Overall, 49.1% had an HbA level of <7% and 64.6% <8%. Later study years and poverty-based eligibility were associated with lower probability of reaching target HbA levels of <7% or <8%. Sex, race, ethnicity, and geography were not associated with likelihood of reaching HbA <7% or <8% in any model.

CONCLUSION

Later study years were associated with lower likelihood of meeting target HbA levels compared with 2011, after adjusting for covariates. With approximately 35% not meeting an HbA target of <8%, more work is needed to improve outcomes of low-income adults with type 2 diabetes.

摘要

简介

尽管糖尿病管理取得了进步,但美国只有四分之一的糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白 A(HbA)、血压和胆固醇达到最佳目标。我们试图评估 2011 年至 2019 年期间,参加阿拉巴马州医疗补助计划的 2 型糖尿病成年人实现血糖控制的时间趋势和预测因素。

方法

我们使用人年作为分析单位,对医疗补助索赔和实验室数据进行回顾性分析。纳入标准为年龄 19 至 64 岁,有糖尿病诊断,在日历年内连续参加医疗补助计划并在前 12 个月内持续参加,且在研究年内至少有 1 次 HbA 结果。主要结局是 HbA 阈值<7%和<8%。主要暴露是研究年。我们分别进行多变量调整后的逻辑回归,以评估研究年与 HbA 阈值之间的关系。

结果

我们纳入了 43997 个人年观察值。平均(标准差)年龄为 51.0(9.9)岁;69.4%为女性;48.1%为黑人,42.9%为白人,0.4%为西班牙裔。总体而言,49.1%的人 HbA 水平<7%,64.6%的人 HbA 水平<8%。较晚的研究年份和基于贫困的资格与达到目标 HbA 水平<7%或<8%的可能性较低相关。在任何模型中,性别、种族、民族和地理位置均与达到 HbA<7%或<8%的可能性无关。

结论

在调整了协变量后,与 2011 年相比,较晚的研究年份与达到目标 HbA 水平的可能性较低相关。大约 35%的人未达到 HbA<8%的目标,因此需要做更多的工作来改善低收入 2 型糖尿病成年患者的结局。

相似文献

1
Trends and Predictors of Glycemic Control Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Covered by Alabama Medicaid, 2011-2019.阿拉巴马州医疗补助计划覆盖的 2 型糖尿病成年人血糖控制的趋势和预测因素,2011-2019 年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Sep 14;20:E81. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.220332.
2
Patient-level factors associated with hemoglobin A1C testing in Alabama Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes.与阿拉巴马州医疗补助计划中患有糖尿病的受益患者的血红蛋白 A1C 检测相关的患者层面因素。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2023 Dec;17(6):612-618. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2023.10.002. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
3
Psychosocial Factors and Glycemic Control in Young Adults With Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes.青年起病 2 型糖尿病患者的社会心理因素与血糖控制
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e245620. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5620.
4
Glycemic Control Outcomes After Canagliflozin Initiation: Observations in a Medicare and Commercial Managed Care Population in Clinical Practice.卡格列净起始治疗后的血糖控制结果:临床实践中医疗保险和商业管理式医疗人群的观察结果
Clin Ther. 2016 Sep;38(9):2046-2057.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
5
Association of Cumulative Multimorbidity, Glycemic Control, and Medication Use With Hypoglycemia-Related Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations Among Adults With Diabetes.累积多病共存、血糖控制和药物使用与成年糖尿病患者低血糖相关急诊就诊和住院的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919099. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19099.
6
Social support and diabetes distress among adults with type 2 diabetes covered by Alabama Medicaid.阿拉巴马州医疗补助计划覆盖的 2 型糖尿病成年人的社会支持与糖尿病困扰。
Diabet Med. 2021 Apr;38(4):e14503. doi: 10.1111/dme.14503. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
7
Relationship between glycemic control and diabetes-related hospital costs in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.1型或2型糖尿病患者血糖控制与糖尿病相关住院费用之间的关系。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2010 May;16(4):264-75. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.4.264.
8
Sociodemographic, Clinical, and Treatment-Related Factors Associated With Hyperglycemic Crises Among Adults With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes in the US From 2014 to 2020.2014 年至 2020 年美国 1 型或 2 型糖尿病成人中与高血糖危象相关的社会人口学、临床和治疗相关因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2123471. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.23471.
9
Association of Race and Ethnicity With Glycemic Control and Hemoglobin A Levels in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病青少年的种族与血糖控制及糖化血红蛋白水平的关联
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5). doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1851.
10
Glycemic Control Over Multiple Decades and Dementia Risk in People With Type 2 Diabetes.血糖控制数十年与 2 型糖尿病患者的痴呆风险。
JAMA Neurol. 2023 Jun 1;80(6):597-604. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.0697.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavioral and demographic associations of optimal glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Sri Lanka: a multicenter study.斯里兰卡2型糖尿病患者最佳血糖控制的行为和人口统计学关联:一项多中心研究。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2025 Jul 14;25(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12902-025-01994-1.
2
Fifteen-year trends in diabetes drug management and control in French-speaking Switzerland.瑞士法语区糖尿病药物管理与控制的十五年趋势
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025 Feb 12;17(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13098-025-01620-z.
3
Neighborhood built and food environment in relation to glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes in the moving to health study.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Diabetes Treatment and Control in U.S. Adults, 1999-2018.美国成年人糖尿病治疗和控制的趋势,1999-2018 年。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2219-2228. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2032271.
2
Rural-Urban Disparities: Diabetes, Hypertension, Heart Disease, and Stroke Mortality Among Black and White Adults, 1999-2018.城乡差异:1999-2018 年黑人和白人成年人的糖尿病、高血压、心脏病和中风死亡率。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Mar 23;77(11):1480-1481. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.01.032.
3
2019 Health Care & Education Presidential Address: It's All About Access!
社区建设和食物环境与“迈向健康研究”中 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制的关系。
Health Place. 2024 Mar;86:103216. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103216. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
4
Interpretive Qualitative Evaluation Informs Research Participation and Advocacy Training Program for Seniors: A Pilot Study.诠释性定性评估为老年人研究参与和宣传培训项目提供信息:一项试点研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 3;11(19):2679. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11192679.
2019年医疗保健与教育总统致辞:一切关乎可及性!
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(1):1-7. doi: 10.2337/dci20-0050.
4
Impact of Expanded Medicaid Eligibility on the Diabetes Continuum of Care Among Low-Income Adults: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis.扩大医疗补助资格对低收入成年人糖尿病连续护理的影响:一项双重差分分析
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Feb;60(2):189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.013. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
5
Medicaid Expansion and Utilization of Antihyperglycemic Therapies.医疗补助计划的扩大与降糖疗法的使用
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov;43(11):2684-2690. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0735. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
6
Health Care Coverage and Glycemic Control in Young Adults With Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the TODAY2 Study.青年 2 型糖尿病患者的医疗保健覆盖范围和血糖控制:来自 TODAY2 研究的结果。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Oct;43(10):2469-2477. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0760. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
7
Glycemic Monitoring and Management in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.血糖监测与管理在慢性肾脏病晚期中的应用。
Endocr Rev. 2020 Oct 1;41(5):756-74. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnaa017.
8
The Effect of Reduced Drug Copayments on Adherence to Oral Diabetes Medications Among Childless Adults in Wisconsin Medicaid.威斯康星州医疗补助计划中减少药物共付额对无子女成年人口服糖尿病药物治疗依从性的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Dec;25(12):1432-1441. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.12.1432.
9
Age and glycemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes in the United States: An assessment from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2014.美国2型糖尿病成年人的年龄与血糖控制:基于2013 - 2014年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的评估
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 Nov-Dec;13(6):3069-3073. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
10
Evaluation of the Cascade of Diabetes Care in the United States, 2005-2016.2005 - 2016年美国糖尿病照护级联评估
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Oct 1;179(10):1376-1385. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2396.