• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与阿拉巴马州医疗补助计划中患有糖尿病的受益患者的血红蛋白 A1C 检测相关的患者层面因素。

Patient-level factors associated with hemoglobin A1C testing in Alabama Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, United States.

出版信息

Prim Care Diabetes. 2023 Dec;17(6):612-618. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2023.10.002. Epub 2023 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.pcd.2023.10.002
PMID:37858401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10841383/
Abstract

AIM

We evaluated patient-level factors associated with receipt of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) testing among Alabama Medicaid beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of person-year observations from Medicaid claims data from 2011 to 2020. Adults aged 19-64 years with type 2 diabetes and continuous enrollment in Medicaid for study year and year prior were included. Primary outcomes were ≥ 1 and ≥ 2 HbA1c test(s) per year. We conducted multivariable Poisson regression stratified by Medicaid eligibility reason (disability, poverty) examining the association of study year, demographics, clinical factors, and healthcare utilization with HbA1c testing.

RESULTS

We analyzed 288,379 observations, 51% with disability-based, 49% poverty-based eligibility. Overall, 57% observations had ≥ 1 HbA1c, 35% had ≥ 2 HbA1c tests. More observations with disability-based than poverty-based eligibility had ≥ 1 (76% vs. 38%) and ≥ 2 HbA1c tests (49% vs. 20%). Patient-level factors were associated with a higher likelihood of having ≥ 1 HbA1c: Black race and older age (disability-based eligibility); year after 2011, female sex, and younger age (poverty-based eligibility); and rurality, insulin use, endocrinology care, diabetes complications, and ambulatory care visits (both groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Just over one-third of adult Alabama Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes had ≥ 2 HbA1c tests per year; testing frequency differed by Medicaid eligibility.

摘要

目的

我们评估了与阿拉巴马州医疗补助计划(Medicaid)受益的 2 型糖尿病患者接受血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)检测相关的患者水平因素。

方法

我们对 2011 年至 2020 年 Medicaid 索赔数据中的人员-年观察值进行了回顾性分析。纳入年龄在 19-64 岁之间、患有 2 型糖尿病且在研究年和前一年连续参加 Medicaid 的成年人。主要结局是每年≥1 次和≥2 次 HbA1c 检测。我们对 Medicaid 资格原因(残疾、贫困)进行了多变量泊松回归分层分析,研究了研究年份、人口统计学因素、临床因素和医疗保健利用与 HbA1c 检测的相关性。

结果

我们分析了 288379 个观察值,其中 51%基于残疾,49%基于贫困。总体而言,57%的观察值有≥1 次 HbA1c 检测,35%有≥2 次 HbA1c 检测。基于残疾的资格比基于贫困的资格有更多的观察值有≥1(76%比 38%)和≥2 次 HbA1c 检测(49%比 20%)。患者水平因素与有更高可能性进行≥1 次 HbA1c 检测相关:黑人种族和年龄较大(基于残疾的资格);2011 年后的年份、女性和年龄较小(基于贫困的资格);以及农村地区、胰岛素使用、内分泌科护理、糖尿病并发症和门诊护理就诊(两组)。

结论

超过三分之一的阿拉巴马州 Medicaid 受益的成年 2 型糖尿病患者每年有≥2 次 HbA1c 检测;检测频率因 Medicaid 资格而异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e7/10841383/1f98d24a18d4/nihms-1939602-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e7/10841383/1f98d24a18d4/nihms-1939602-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e7/10841383/1f98d24a18d4/nihms-1939602-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient-level factors associated with hemoglobin A1C testing in Alabama Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes.与阿拉巴马州医疗补助计划中患有糖尿病的受益患者的血红蛋白 A1C 检测相关的患者层面因素。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2023 Dec;17(6):612-618. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2023.10.002. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
2
Trends and Predictors of Glycemic Control Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Covered by Alabama Medicaid, 2011-2019.阿拉巴马州医疗补助计划覆盖的 2 型糖尿病成年人血糖控制的趋势和预测因素,2011-2019 年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Sep 14;20:E81. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.220332.
3
Association of Cumulative Multimorbidity, Glycemic Control, and Medication Use With Hypoglycemia-Related Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations Among Adults With Diabetes.累积多病共存、血糖控制和药物使用与成年糖尿病患者低血糖相关急诊就诊和住院的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919099. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19099.
4
Primary care visits and ambulatory care sensitive diabetes hospitalizations among adult Alabama Medicaid beneficiaries.阿拉巴马州医疗补助受益成年人的初级保健就诊和门诊医疗敏感型糖尿病住院治疗。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2022 Feb;16(1):116-121. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
5
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care Use and Access Associated With Loss of Medicaid Supplemental Insurance Eligibility Above the Federal Poverty Level.医疗保健使用和获得方面的种族和族裔差异与超过联邦贫困水平的医疗补助补充保险资格丧失有关。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Jun 1;183(6):534-543. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0512.
6
Relationship between glycemic control and diabetes-related hospital costs in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.1型或2型糖尿病患者血糖控制与糖尿病相关住院费用之间的关系。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2010 May;16(4):264-75. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.4.264.
7
Associations of Race, Insurance, and Zip Code-Level Income with Nonadherence Diagnoses in Primary and Specialty Diabetes Care.种族、保险和邮政编码收入与初级和专科糖尿病护理中不遵医嘱诊断的关联。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Sep-Oct;34(5):891-897. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.05.200639.
8
Sociodemographic, Clinical, and Treatment-Related Factors Associated With Hyperglycemic Crises Among Adults With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes in the US From 2014 to 2020.2014 年至 2020 年美国 1 型或 2 型糖尿病成人中与高血糖危象相关的社会人口学、临床和治疗相关因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2123471. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.23471.
9
Association Between Clinical Practice Group Adherence to Quality Measures and Adverse Outcomes Among Adult Patients With Diabetes.临床实践组对质量措施的依从性与成年糖尿病患者不良结局之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199139. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9139.
10
Implementing Lifestyle Change Interventions to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes in US Medicaid Programs: Cost Effectiveness, and Cost, Health, and Health Equity Impact.在美国医疗补助计划中实施生活方式改变干预措施预防 2 型糖尿病:成本效益、成本、健康和健康公平影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Oct;18(5):713-726. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00565-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-Reported Care Coordination is Associated with Better Performance on Clinical Care Measures.患者报告的护理协调与临床护理措施的更好表现相关。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Dec;36(12):3665-3671. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07122-8. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
2
Hemoglobin A1C testing frequency among patients with type 2 diabetes within a US payer system: a retrospective observational study.在美国支付体系中,2 型糖尿病患者的血红蛋白 A1C 检测频率:一项回顾性观察研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Nov;37(11):1859-1866. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1965562. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
3
Associations between attainment of incentivised primary care indicators and emergency hospital admissions among type 2 diabetes patients: a population-based historical cohort study.
激励型初级保健指标的达标情况与 2 型糖尿病患者急诊住院之间的关联:一项基于人群的历史队列研究。
J R Soc Med. 2021 Jun;114(6):299-312. doi: 10.1177/01410768211005109. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
4
Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes: A Scientific Review.健康与糖尿病的社会决定因素:一项科学综述。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov 2;44(1):258-79. doi: 10.2337/dci20-0053.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis of patient race/ethnicity, socioeconomics, and quality for adult type 2 diabetes.患者种族/民族、社会经济学和成人 2 型糖尿病质量的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct;55(5):741-772. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13326. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
6
Changes in Preventative Health Care After Medicaid Expansion.医疗补助扩张后预防性保健的变化。
Med Care. 2020 Jun;58(6):549-556. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001307.
7
Understanding the Socioeconomic and Health Challenges of the Medicaid Expansion Population in Oregon.理解俄勒冈州医疗补助扩张人口的社会经济和健康挑战。
Popul Health Manag. 2020 Jun;23(3):256-263. doi: 10.1089/pop.2019.0088. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
8
Evaluation of the Cascade of Diabetes Care in the United States, 2005-2016.2005 - 2016年美国糖尿病照护级联评估
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Oct 1;179(10):1376-1385. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2396.
9
5. Lifestyle Management: .5. 生活方式管理: 。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S46-S60. doi: 10.2337/dc19-S005.
10
The Legacy Effect in Type 2 Diabetes: Impact of Early Glycemic Control on Future Complications (The Diabetes & Aging Study).2 型糖尿病的遗留效应:早期血糖控制对未来并发症的影响(糖尿病与衰老研究)。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Mar;42(3):416-426. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1144. Epub 2018 Aug 13.