• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植被弹性估计的可靠性取决于生物量密度。

Reliability of vegetation resilience estimates depends on biomass density.

机构信息

Institute of Geosciences, Universität Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

Earth System Modelling, School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Nat Ecol Evol. 2023 Nov;7(11):1799-1808. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02194-7. Epub 2023 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1038/s41559-023-02194-7
PMID:37710044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10627832/
Abstract

Concerns have been raised that the resilience of vegetated ecosystems may be negatively impacted by ongoing anthropogenic climate and land-use change at the global scale. Several recent studies present global vegetation resilience trends based on satellite data using diverse methodological set-ups. Here, upon a systematic comparison of data sets, spatial and temporal pre-processing, and resilience estimation methods, we propose a methodology that avoids different biases present in previous results. Nevertheless, we find that resilience estimation using optical satellite vegetation data is broadly problematic in dense tropical and high-latitude boreal forests, regardless of the vegetation index chosen. However, for wide parts of the mid-latitudes-especially with low biomass density-resilience can be reliably estimated using several optical vegetation indices. We infer a spatially consistent global pattern of resilience gain and loss across vegetation indices, with more regions facing declining resilience, especially in Africa, Australia and central Asia.

摘要

人们担心,在全球范围内,不断发生的人为气候变化和土地利用变化可能会对植被生态系统的恢复力产生负面影响。最近的几项研究基于卫星数据,使用不同的方法框架,提出了全球植被恢复力趋势。在这里,我们通过对数据集、空间和时间预处理以及恢复力估计方法进行系统比较,提出了一种避免先前结果中存在的不同偏差的方法。然而,我们发现,无论选择哪种植被指数,使用光学卫星植被数据来估计恢复力都存在广泛的问题,尤其是在密集的热带和高纬度北方森林地区。然而,对于中纬度的大部分地区——特别是生物量密度较低的地区——使用多种光学植被指数可以可靠地估计恢复力。我们推断出了一种跨越植被指数的具有空间一致性的全球恢复力增益和损失模式,越来越多的地区面临恢复力下降的情况,尤其是在非洲、澳大利亚和中亚地区。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/179605979200/41559_2023_2194_Fig11_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/728fc2072e8a/41559_2023_2194_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/8ffe606c631e/41559_2023_2194_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/ac9ce9243fef/41559_2023_2194_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/2248920dd279/41559_2023_2194_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/5544ee45d46e/41559_2023_2194_Fig5_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/c7c332a0b6e6/41559_2023_2194_Fig6_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/8244a0e84c6c/41559_2023_2194_Fig7_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/63bdfece51d2/41559_2023_2194_Fig8_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/04c8257a68f7/41559_2023_2194_Fig9_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/06c83befa7fe/41559_2023_2194_Fig10_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/179605979200/41559_2023_2194_Fig11_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/728fc2072e8a/41559_2023_2194_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/8ffe606c631e/41559_2023_2194_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/ac9ce9243fef/41559_2023_2194_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/2248920dd279/41559_2023_2194_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/5544ee45d46e/41559_2023_2194_Fig5_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/c7c332a0b6e6/41559_2023_2194_Fig6_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/8244a0e84c6c/41559_2023_2194_Fig7_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/63bdfece51d2/41559_2023_2194_Fig8_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/04c8257a68f7/41559_2023_2194_Fig9_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/06c83befa7fe/41559_2023_2194_Fig10_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bcd/10627832/179605979200/41559_2023_2194_Fig11_ESM.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability of vegetation resilience estimates depends on biomass density.植被弹性估计的可靠性取决于生物量密度。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2023 Nov;7(11):1799-1808. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02194-7. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
2
Warming and disturbances affect Arctic-boreal vegetation resilience across northwestern North America.气候变暖和干扰影响了北美西北部北极-北方地区植被的恢复力。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2024 Dec;8(12):2265-2276. doi: 10.1038/s41559-024-02551-0. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
3
Responses of vegetation to changes in terrestrial water storage and temperature in global mountainous regions.全球山区植被对陆地水储量和温度变化的响应。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Dec 10;851(Pt 2):158416. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158416. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
4
Vulnerability of the global terrestrial ecosystems to climate change.全球陆地生态系统对气候变化的脆弱性。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Sep;24(9):4095-4106. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14327. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
5
Assessing vegetation stability to climate variability in Central Asia.评估中亚地区植被对气候变化的稳定性。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Nov 15;298:113330. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113330. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
6
Sensitivity of global terrestrial ecosystems to climate variability.全球陆地生态系统对气候变率的敏感性。
Nature. 2016 Mar 10;531(7593):229-32. doi: 10.1038/nature16986. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
7
Confounding effects of snow cover on remotely sensed vegetation indices of evergreen and deciduous trees: An experimental study.积雪对常绿和落叶树木遥感植被指数的混淆影响:一项实验研究。
Glob Chang Biol. 2023 Nov;29(21):6120-6138. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16916. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
8
Global vegetation resilience linked to water availability and variability.全球植被弹性与水分供应和变异性有关。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jan 30;14(1):498. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36207-7.
9
Global and regional modelling of Arctic-boreal vegetation distribution and its sensitivity to altered forcing.北极-北方植被分布的全球和区域建模及其对变化强迫的敏感性。
Glob Chang Biol. 2000 Dec;6(S1):1-18. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.06011.x. Epub 2002 Jan 5.
10
High ecosystem stability of evergreen broadleaf forests under severe droughts.常绿阔叶林在严重干旱下具有较高的生态系统稳定性。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Oct;25(10):3494-3503. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14748. Epub 2019 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Pervasive but biome-dependent relationship between fragmentation and resilience in forests.森林中破碎化与恢复力之间普遍存在但依赖于生物群落的关系。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1038/s41559-025-02776-7.
2
Extreme Events Contributing to Tipping Elements and Tipping Points.导致临界要素和临界点的极端事件。
Surv Geophys. 2025;46(2):375-420. doi: 10.1007/s10712-024-09863-7. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
3
Asymmetric sensitivity of boreal forest resilience to forest gain and loss.北方森林恢复力对森林增加和减少的不对称敏感性。

本文引用的文献

1
Global vegetation resilience linked to water availability and variability.全球植被弹性与水分供应和变异性有关。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jan 30;14(1):498. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36207-7.
2
Increasing and widespread vulnerability of intact tropical rainforests to repeated droughts.完整的热带雨林对反复干旱的脆弱性日益增加且广泛存在。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Sep 13;119(37):e2116626119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116626119. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3
Early warning signal for a tipping point suggested by a millennial Atlantic Multidecadal Variability reconstruction.
Nat Ecol Evol. 2025 Mar;9(3):505-514. doi: 10.1038/s41559-024-02631-1. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
4
Resilience Indicators for Tropical Rainforests in a Dynamic Vegetation Model.动态植被模型中热带雨林的恢复力指标
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Dec;30(12):e17613. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17613.
5
Warming and disturbances affect Arctic-boreal vegetation resilience across northwestern North America.气候变暖和干扰影响了北美西北部北极-北方地区植被的恢复力。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2024 Dec;8(12):2265-2276. doi: 10.1038/s41559-024-02551-0. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
6
Uncertainties too large to predict tipping times of major Earth system components from historical data.不确定性太大,无法根据历史数据预测地球主要系统组成部分的临界点时间。
Sci Adv. 2024 Aug 2;10(31):eadl4841. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adl4841.
千年大西洋多年代际变率重建显示, tipping point 出现预警信号。
Nat Commun. 2022 Sep 2;13(1):5176. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32704-3.
4
Emerging signals of declining forest resilience under climate change.气候变化下森林恢复力下降的新信号。
Nature. 2022 Aug;608(7923):534-539. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04959-9. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
5
Critical slowing down suggests that the western Greenland Ice Sheet is close to a tipping point.临界减速表明,格陵兰岛西部冰原即将达到临界点。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 May 25;118(21). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2024192118.
6
A unified vegetation index for quantifying the terrestrial biosphere.一种用于量化陆地生物圈的统一植被指数。
Sci Adv. 2021 Feb 26;7(9). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc7447. Print 2021 Feb.
7
Harmonized global maps of above and belowground biomass carbon density in the year 2010.2010 年地上和地下生物量碳密度的全球协调图。
Sci Data. 2020 Apr 6;7(1):112. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0444-4.
8
Early-warning signals for Dansgaard-Oeschger events in a high-resolution ice core record.高分辨率冰芯记录中的 Dansgaard-Oeschger 事件预警信号。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jul 2;9(1):2556. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04881-7.
9
Thresholds for boreal biome transitions.北方生物群区转换的阈值。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 26;109(52):21384-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219844110. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
10
Global resilience of tropical forest and savanna to critical transitions.热带森林和稀树草原对关键转变的全球恢复力。
Science. 2011 Oct 14;334(6053):232-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1210657.