• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与 SARS-CoV-2 引起的严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者对俯卧位治疗无反应相关的因素。

Factors associated with a nonresponse to prone positioning in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to SARS-CoV-2.

机构信息

Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - Bogotá, Colombia.

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - Bogotá, Colombia.

出版信息

Crit Care Sci. 2023 Apr-Jun;35(2):156-162. doi: 10.5935/2965-2774.20230343-en.

DOI:10.5935/2965-2774.20230343-en
PMID:37712804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10406407/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for nonresponse to prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-associated severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and refractory hypoxemia in a tertiary care hospital in Colombia.

METHODS

Observational study based on a retrospective cohort of mechanically ventilated patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to SARS-CoV-2 who underwent prone positioning due to refractory hypoxemia. The study considered an improvement ≥ 20% in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio after the first cycle of 16 hours in the prone position to be a 'response'. Nonresponding patients were considered cases, and responding patients were controls. We controlled for clinical, laboratory, and radiological variables.

RESULTS

A total of 724 patients were included (58.67 ± 12.37 years, 67.7% males). Of those, 21.9% were nonresponders. Mortality was 54.1% for nonresponders and 31.3% for responders (p < 0.001). Variables associated with nonresponse were time from the start of mechanical ventilation to pronation (OR 1.23; 95%CI 1.10 - 1.41); preintubation PaO2/FiO2 ratio (OR 0.62; 95%CI 0.40 - 0.96); preprone PaO2/FiO2 ratio (OR 1.88. 95%CI 1.22 - 2.94); and radiologic multilobe consolidation (OR 2.12; 95%CI 1.33 - 3.33) or mixed pattern (OR 1.72; 95%CI 1.07 - 2.85) compared with a ground-glass pattern.

CONCLUSION

This study identified factors associated with nonresponse to prone positioning in patients with refractory hypoxemia and acute respiratory distress syndrome due to SARS-CoV-2 receiving mechanical ventilation. Recognizing such factors helps identify candidates for other rescue strategies, including more extensive prone positioning or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Further studies are needed to assess the consistency of these findings in populations with acute respiratory distress syndrome of other etiologies.

摘要

目的

在哥伦比亚的一家三级护理医院中,确定 COVID-19 相关严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征和难治性低氧血症机械通气患者对俯卧位治疗无反应的危险因素。

方法

这是一项基于 SARS-CoV-2 导致严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的回顾性队列观察性研究,这些患者因难治性低氧血症而接受俯卧位治疗。该研究将俯卧位第一个 16 小时周期后 PaO2/FiO2 比值提高≥20%定义为“有反应”。无反应的患者被视为病例,有反应的患者被视为对照。我们对临床、实验室和影像学变量进行了控制。

结果

共纳入 724 例患者(58.67±12.37 岁,67.7%为男性)。其中,21.9%为无反应者。无反应者的死亡率为 54.1%,而有反应者的死亡率为 31.3%(p<0.001)。与无反应相关的变量包括从开始机械通气到俯卧位的时间(OR 1.23;95%CI 1.10-1.41);插管前 PaO2/FiO2 比值(OR 0.62;95%CI 0.40-0.96);俯卧位前 PaO2/FiO2 比值(OR 1.88;95%CI 1.22-2.94);以及影像学多肺叶实变(OR 2.12;95%CI 1.33-3.33)或混合模式(OR 1.72;95%CI 1.07-2.85),与磨玻璃样模式相比。

结论

本研究确定了 SARS-CoV-2 导致的机械通气难治性低氧血症和急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者对俯卧位治疗无反应的相关因素。识别这些因素有助于确定其他抢救策略的候选者,包括更广泛的俯卧位或体外膜氧合。需要进一步的研究来评估这些发现在其他病因引起的急性呼吸窘迫综合征人群中的一致性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c51/10406407/61b0b6281954/ccsci-35-02-0156-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c51/10406407/2cd0127d6d44/ccsci-35-02-0156-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c51/10406407/61b0b6281954/ccsci-35-02-0156-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c51/10406407/2cd0127d6d44/ccsci-35-02-0156-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c51/10406407/61b0b6281954/ccsci-35-02-0156-g02.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors associated with a nonresponse to prone positioning in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to SARS-CoV-2.与 SARS-CoV-2 引起的严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者对俯卧位治疗无反应相关的因素。
Crit Care Sci. 2023 Apr-Jun;35(2):156-162. doi: 10.5935/2965-2774.20230343-en.
2
Improved Oxygenation After Prone Positioning May Be a Predictor of Survival in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.俯卧位通气后氧合改善可能是急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者生存的预测指标。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;48(12):1729-1736. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004611.
3
Effects of the prone position on gas exchange and hemodynamics in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.俯卧位对重症急性呼吸窘迫综合征气体交换和血流动力学的影响。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Dec;26(12):1977-85. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199812000-00023.
4
Prone positioning for patients intubated for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID-19: a retrospective observational cohort study.COVID-19 继发严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者行气管插管后俯卧位治疗:一项回顾性观察性队列研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Jan;126(1):48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.09.042. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
5
Feasibility and physiological effects of prone positioning in non-intubated patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 (PRON-COVID): a prospective cohort study.COVID-19 所致急性呼吸衰竭未插管患者俯卧位通气的可行性和生理影响(PRON-COVID):一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Aug;8(8):765-774. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30268-X. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
6
Prone positioning in mechanically ventilated patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and coronavirus disease 2019.俯卧位通气在严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征合并 2019 冠状病毒病机械通气患者中的应用。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021 Mar;65(3):360-363. doi: 10.1111/aas.13741. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
7
Recruitment maneuvers during prone positioning in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者俯卧位时的肺复张手法
Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan;33(1):54-61; quiz 62. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000149853.47651.f0.
8
Prone Position in COVID-19 and -COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An International Multicenter Observational Comparative Study.COVID-19 患者俯卧位通气和 COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征:一项国际多中心观察性对比研究。
Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 1;50(4):633-643. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005354.
9
Prone Positioning in Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Due to COVID-19: A Cohort Study and Analysis of Physiology.COVID-19 所致中度至重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者采用俯卧位通气治疗:一项队列研究及生理学分析。
J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):241-252. doi: 10.1177/0885066620980399.
10
Predicting Impact of Prone Position on Oxygenation in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with COVID-19.预测 COVID-19 机械通气患者俯卧位对氧合的影响。
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jul;37(7):883-889. doi: 10.1177/08850666221081757. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative Computed Tomography and Response to Pronation in COVID-19 ARDS.定量计算机断层扫描与 COVID-19 相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征旋前反应。
Respir Care. 2024 Oct 25;69(11):1380-1391. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11625.
2
Prone position failure in moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: and now?中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征俯卧位通气失败:现在呢?
Crit Care Sci. 2023 Apr-Jun;35(2):112-114. doi: 10.5935/2965-2774.2023.Edit-1.v35n2-en.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic value of computed tomographic findings in acute respiratory distress syndrome and the response to prone positioning.急性呼吸窘迫综合征 CT 表现的预后价值及其对俯卧位通气的反应。
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Feb 25;22(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-01864-9.
2
Prone position in ARDS patients: why, when, how and for whom.ARDS 患者的俯卧位通气:为什么、何时、如何以及针对哪些患者。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2385-2396. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06306-w. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
3
Initial emergency department mechanical ventilation strategies for COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS.
COVID-19 低氧性呼吸衰竭和 ARDS 的初始急诊机械通气策略。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;38(10):2194-2202. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.06.082. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
4
The novel coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19): Mechanism of action, detection and recent therapeutic strategies.新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19):作用机制、检测和最近的治疗策略。
Virology. 2020 Dec;551:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2020.08.011. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
5
Improved Oxygenation After Prone Positioning May Be a Predictor of Survival in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.俯卧位通气后氧合改善可能是急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者生存的预测指标。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;48(12):1729-1736. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004611.
6
A physiological approach to understand the role of respiratory effort in the progression of lung injury in SARS-CoV-2 infection.从生理学角度理解呼吸努力在 SARS-CoV-2 感染导致肺损伤进展中的作用。
Crit Care. 2020 Aug 10;24(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03197-7.
7
Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19.地塞米松在 COVID-19 住院患者中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 25;384(8):693-704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021436. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
8
Associations between changes in oxygenation, dead space and driving pressure induced by the first prone position session and mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者首次俯卧位治疗期间氧合、死腔和驱动压变化与死亡率之间的关联。
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Dec;11(12):5004-5013. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.38.
9
Assessment of oxygenation response to prone position ventilation in ARDS by lung ultrasonography.通过肺部超声评估急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者俯卧位通气的氧合反应。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1601-1603. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4440-2. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
10
Lung ultrasonography for assessment of oxygenation response to prone position ventilation in ARDS.肺部超声评估 ARDS 患者俯卧位通气氧合反应。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1546-1556. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4411-7. Epub 2016 Jun 20.