• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者首次俯卧位治疗期间氧合、死腔和驱动压变化与死亡率之间的关联。

Associations between changes in oxygenation, dead space and driving pressure induced by the first prone position session and mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

作者信息

van Meenen David M, Roozeman Jan-Paul, Serpa Neto Ary, Pelosi Paolo, Gama de Abreu Marcelo, Horn Janneke, Cremer Olaf L, Paulus Frederique, Schultz Marcus J

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2019 Dec;11(12):5004-5013. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.38.

DOI:10.21037/jtd.2019.12.38
PMID:32030216
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6987992/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Outcome prediction in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is challenging, especially in patients with severe hypoxemia. The aim of the current study was to determine the prognostic capacity of changes in PaO/FiO, dead space fraction (V/V) and respiratory system driving pressure (ΔP) induced by the first prone position (PP) session in patients with ARDS.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of the conveniently-sized 'Molecular Diagnosis and Risk Stratification of Sepsis' study (MARS). The current analysis included ARDS patients who were placed in the PP. The primary endpoint was the prognostic capacity of the PP-induced changes in PaO/FiO, V/V, and ΔP for 28-day mortality. PaO/FiO, V/V, and ΔP was calculated using variables obtained in the supine position before and after completion of the first PP session. Receiving operator characteristic curves (ROC) were constructed, and sensitivity, specificity positive and negative predictive value were calculated based on the best cutoffs.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were included; 28-day mortality was 46%. PP-induced changes in PaO/FiO and V/V were similar between survivors non-survivors [+83 (+24 to +137) +58 (+21 to +113) mmHg, and -0.06 (-0.17 to +0.05) -0.08 (-0.16 to +0.08), respectively]. PP-induced changes in ΔP were different between survivors non-survivors [-3 (-7 to 2) 0 (-3 to +3) cmHO; P=0.03]. The area under the ROC of PP-induced changes in ΔP for mortality, however, was low [0.63 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.50 to 0.75]; PP-induced changes in ΔP had a sensitivity and specificity of 76% and 56%, and a positive and negative predictive value of 60% and 73%.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in PaO/FiO, V/V, and ΔP induced by the first PP session have poor prognostic capacities for 28-day mortality in ARDS patients.

摘要

背景

急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的预后预测具有挑战性,尤其是对于严重低氧血症患者。本研究的目的是确定首次俯卧位(PP)治疗引起的动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数(PaO/FiO)、死腔分数(V/V)和呼吸系统驱动压(ΔP)变化对ARDS患者的预后评估能力。

方法

这是对规模合适的“脓毒症的分子诊断和风险分层”研究(MARS)进行的事后分析。当前分析纳入了接受PP治疗的ARDS患者。主要终点是PP诱导的PaO/FiO、V/V和ΔP变化对28天死亡率的预后评估能力。PaO/FiO、V/V和ΔP通过首次PP治疗前后仰卧位时获得的变量计算得出。构建受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),并根据最佳截断值计算敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值。

结果

纳入90例患者;28天死亡率为46%。幸存者与非幸存者之间,PP诱导的PaO/FiO和V/V变化相似[分别为+83(+24至+137)和+58(+21至+113)mmHg,以及-0.06(-0.17至+0.05)和-0.08(-0.16至+0.08)]。幸存者与非幸存者之间,PP诱导的ΔP变化不同[-3(-7至2)和0(-3至+3)cmH₂O;P=0.03]。然而,PP诱导的ΔP变化对死亡率的ROC曲线下面积较低[0.63(95%置信区间(CI),0.50至0.75];PP诱导的ΔP变化的敏感性和特异性分别为76%和56%,阳性和阴性预测值分别为60%和73%。

结论

首次PP治疗引起的PaO/FiO、V/V和ΔP变化对ARDS患者28天死亡率的预后评估能力较差。

相似文献

1
Associations between changes in oxygenation, dead space and driving pressure induced by the first prone position session and mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者首次俯卧位治疗期间氧合、死腔和驱动压变化与死亡率之间的关联。
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Dec;11(12):5004-5013. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.38.
2
PaCO2 and alveolar dead space are more relevant than PaO2/FiO2 ratio in monitoring the respiratory response to prone position in ARDS patients: a physiological study.动脉血二氧化碳分压和肺泡死腔量比 PaO2/FiO2 比值更能反映 ARDS 患者俯卧位通气时的呼吸反应:一项生理学研究。
Crit Care. 2011 Jul 25;15(4):R175. doi: 10.1186/cc10324.
3
Physiological response to prone positioning in intubated adults with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective study.COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征气管插管成人俯卧位的生理反应:一项回顾性研究。
Respir Res. 2022 Nov 19;23(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02247-8.
4
Changes in Driving Pressure vs Oxygenation as Predictor of Mortality in Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients Receiving Prone Position Ventilation.接受俯卧位通气的中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者驱动压与氧合变化对死亡率的预测作用
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb;28(2):134-140. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24643.
5
Effect of driving pressure on mortality in ARDS patients during lung protective mechanical ventilation in two randomized controlled trials.两项随机对照试验中驱动压对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者在肺保护性机械通气期间死亡率的影响。
Crit Care. 2016 Nov 29;20(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1556-2.
6
Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure strategy in supine and prone position on lung and chest wall mechanics in acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征中呼气末正压策略在仰卧位和俯卧位对肺和胸壁力学的影响
Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Sep 10;8(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0434-2.
7
Respiratory effects of prone position in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome differ according to the recruitment-to-inflation ratio: a prospective observational study.俯卧位对新型冠状病毒肺炎急性呼吸窘迫综合征呼吸效应的影响因复张与充气比而异:一项前瞻性观察研究
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Sep 18;14(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01375-2.
8
Prone position and recruitment manoeuvre: the combined effect improves oxygenation.俯卧位和复张手法:联合作用改善氧合。
Crit Care. 2011;15(3):R125. doi: 10.1186/cc10235. Epub 2011 May 16.
9
[Comparison of pulse oxygen saturation/fraction of inhaled oxygen and arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inhaled oxygen in the assessment of oxygenation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients at different high altitudes in Yunnan Province].[云南省不同高海拔地区急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者氧合评估中脉搏血氧饱和度/吸入氧分数与动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数的比较]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Jul;33(7):826-831. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210301-00303.
10
[Diagnostic value of mechanical power in patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: an analysis using the data from MIMIC-III].[机械功率在中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中的诊断价值:一项基于MIMIC-III数据的分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022 Jan;34(1):35-40. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210630-00978.

引用本文的文献

1
Improved understanding of the respiratory drive pathophysiology could lead to earlier spontaneous breathing in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.对呼吸驱动病理生理学的深入理解可能会使重症急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者更早地实现自主呼吸。
Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care. 2023 Aug 24;2(5):e0030. doi: 10.1097/EA9.0000000000000030. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Validation of a method for estimating pulmonary dead space in ventilated beagles to correct exhaled propofol concentration in mixed air.一种用于估计通气比格犬肺死腔以校正混合气体中呼出丙泊酚浓度的方法的验证。
BMC Vet Res. 2025 Jan 7;21(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04458-1.
3
The development of a C5.0 machine learning model in a limited data set to predict early mortality in patients with ARDS undergoing an initial session of prone positioning.在有限数据集上开发C5.0机器学习模型,以预测接受首次俯卧位通气治疗的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的早期死亡率。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2024 Nov 14;12(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40635-024-00682-z.
4
Changes in Driving Pressure vs Oxygenation as Predictor of Mortality in Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients Receiving Prone Position Ventilation.接受俯卧位通气的中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者驱动压与氧合变化对死亡率的预测作用
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb;28(2):134-140. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24643.
5
Impact of prone position on dead-space fraction in COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome.俯卧位对 COVID-19 相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征死腔分数的影响。
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Jan 5;24(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-02845-w.
6
Factors associated with a nonresponse to prone positioning in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to SARS-CoV-2.与 SARS-CoV-2 引起的严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者对俯卧位治疗无反应相关的因素。
Crit Care Sci. 2023 Apr-Jun;35(2):156-162. doi: 10.5935/2965-2774.20230343-en.
7
Predictors of intubation in COVID-19 patients undergoing awake proning in the emergency department.COVID-19 患者在急诊科清醒俯卧位通气时插管的预测因素。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Nov;49:276-286. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
8
Characterising the pulmonary response to prone positioning. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: 48-55.描述俯卧位对肺部的影响。对《英国麻醉学杂志》2021年;126: 48 - 55的评论
Br J Anaesth. 2021 May;126(5):e191-e192. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
9
Intubation rate of patients with hypoxia due to COVID-19 treated with awake proning: A meta-analysis.COVID-19 所致低氧患者清醒俯卧位治疗时的插管率:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 May;43:88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.01.058. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
10
Prone position in ARDS patients: why, when, how and for whom.ARDS 患者的俯卧位通气:为什么、何时、如何以及针对哪些患者。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2385-2396. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06306-w. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Calculation of mechanical power for pressure-controlled ventilation.压力控制通气的机械功率计算
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Sep;45(9):1321-1323. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05636-8. Epub 2019 May 17.
2
A prospective international observational prevalence study on prone positioning of ARDS patients: the APRONET (ARDS Prone Position Network) study.一项关于 ARDS 患者俯卧位的前瞻性国际观察性流行率研究:APRONET(ARDS 俯卧位网络)研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jan;44(1):22-37. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4996-5. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
3
Prone Position for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.俯卧位治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征。系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Oct;14(Supplement_4):S280-S288. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-343OT.
4
Effect of Lung Recruitment and Titrated Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) vs Low PEEP on Mortality in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.肺复张与滴定式呼气末正压通气(PEEP)对比低PEEP对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者死亡率的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1335-1345. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14171.
5
Driving pressure: a marker of severity, a safety limit, or a goal for mechanical ventilation?驱动压力:严重程度的标志物、安全极限还是机械通气的目标?
Crit Care. 2017 Aug 4;21(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1779-x.
6
Potentially modifiable factors contributing to outcome from acute respiratory distress syndrome: the LUNG SAFE study.可能影响急性呼吸窘迫综合征预后的可调节因素:LUNG SAFE 研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):1865-1876. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4571-5. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
7
External validation of the APPS, a new and simple outcome prediction score in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome.外部验证 APPS 评分,一种新的、简单的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者预后预测评分。
Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0190-0. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
8
Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data.全麻机械通气患者的驱动压与术后肺部并发症发生的关系:一项个体患者数据分析的荟萃分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Apr;4(4):272-80. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)00057-6. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
9
Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries.全球 50 个国家重症监护病房急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的流行病学、治疗模式和死亡率。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291.
10
The Propensity Score.倾向评分
JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1637-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13480.