• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

"非命运之使然":进步时代的埃伦·理查兹、优生学与环境。

"Not by a Decree of Fate:" Ellen Richards, Euthenics, and the Environment in the Progressive Era.

机构信息

History Department, John Jay College of the City University of New York, 524 W. 59th St., New York, 10019, USA.

出版信息

J Hist Biol. 2023 Oct;56(3):525-557. doi: 10.1007/s10739-023-09733-9. Epub 2023 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1007/s10739-023-09733-9
PMID:37713050
Abstract

In 1904, Ellen Richards introduced "euthenics." By 1912, Lewellys Barker, director of medicine and physician-in-chief at Johns Hopkins Hospital, would tell the New York Times that the "task of eugenics" and the "task of euthenics" was the "Task for the Nation." Alongside the emergence of hereditarian eugenics, where fate was firmly rooted in heredity, this article places euthenics into the same Progressive Era demands for the scientific management over environmental issues like life and labor, health and hygiene, sewage and sanitation. I argue that euthenics not only heralded women as leaders in the quest for what Richards and eugenicists termed "racial improvement," but also aimed to make reforms through environmental and educational changes rather than hereditary interventions. Seeking to recuperate the figure of Ellen Richards in the history of science, I place Richards and her euthenics more into the debate over eugenics rather than over the emergence of home economics. Building on the work of Donald Opitz, Staffan Bergwik, and Brigette Van Tiggelen, this article shows, first, how Richards' career threads the needle between the home and the laboratory as sites of science making, not as separate spheres but as overlapping realms, and helps recover how domestic concerns shaped the focus of the life sciences. Second, this article shows how euthenics shaped eugenics by looking at the writings of American eugenicists Charles Davenport, Paul Popenoe, and David Starr Jordan. Third, the article describes how euthenics took root in new academic departments of domestic science, home economics, and departments child welfare and family life in the 1920 and 1930s, most notably the department of euthenics at the Kansas State Agricultural College from 1926 and the Institute of Euthenics at Vassar College after 1923.

摘要

1904 年,埃伦·理查兹(Ellen Richards)引入了“优生学”。到 1912 年,约翰霍普金斯医院的医学主任和内科主任刘易斯·巴克(Lewellys Barker)告诉《纽约时报》,“优生学的任务”和“优生学的任务”是“国家的任务”。随着遗传优生学的出现,命运牢牢扎根于遗传,本文将优生学置于同样的进步时代要求之中,即对环境问题进行科学管理,例如生命和劳动、健康和卫生、污水和卫生。我认为,优生学不仅预示着女性将成为追求理查兹和优生学家所谓的“种族改善”的领导者,而且还旨在通过环境和教育变革而不是遗传干预来进行改革。本文试图在科学史中恢复埃伦·理查兹的形象,将理查兹和她的优生学更多地置于优生学的争论中,而不是家庭经济学的出现。本文以唐纳德·奥皮茨(Donald Opitz)、斯塔凡·伯格维克(Staffan Bergwik)和布里吉特·范·蒂格伦(Brigette Van Tiggelen)的工作为基础,首先展示了理查兹的职业生涯如何将家庭和实验室作为科学创造的场所联系在一起,而不是作为独立的领域,而是作为重叠的领域,帮助人们重新认识到家庭问题如何塑造了生命科学的焦点。其次,本文通过考察美国优生学家查尔斯·达文波特(Charles Davenport)、保罗·波普诺(Paul Popenoe)和大卫·斯塔尔·乔丹(David Starr Jordan)的著作,展示了优生学如何塑造优生学。第三,本文描述了优生学如何在 20 世纪 20 年代和 30 年代在新的家政科学、家庭经济学以及儿童福利和家庭生活系生根,尤其是堪萨斯州立农业学院从 1926 年开始的优生学系和 1923 年之后瓦萨学院的优生学研究所。

相似文献

1
"Not by a Decree of Fate:" Ellen Richards, Euthenics, and the Environment in the Progressive Era."非命运之使然":进步时代的埃伦·理查兹、优生学与环境。
J Hist Biol. 2023 Oct;56(3):525-557. doi: 10.1007/s10739-023-09733-9. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
2
Human heredity and politics: A comparative institutional study of the Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor (United States), the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics (Germany), and the Maxim Gorky Medical Genetics Institute (USSR).人类遗传与政治:对美国冷泉港优生学记录办公室、德国威廉皇帝人类学、人类遗传与优生学研究所和苏联马克西姆·高尔基医学遗传学研究所的比较制度研究
Osiris. 2005;20:232-62. doi: 10.1086/649420.
3
Duty or dream? Edwin G. Conklin's critique of eugenics and support for American individualism.责任还是梦想?埃德温·G·康克林对优生学的批判与对美国个人主义的支持。
J Hist Biol. 2002 Summer;35(2):365-84. doi: 10.1023/a:1016077829496.
4
"At a Glance:" The Role of Diagrammatic Representations in Eugenics Appropriations of the "Infamous Juke Family".“一目了然”:图表表示在对“声名狼藉的朱克家族”的优生学应用中的作用。
J Hist Biol. 2024 Mar;57(1):51-87. doi: 10.1007/s10739-023-09755-3. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
5
Human genetics and politics as mutually beneficial resources: The case of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics during the Third Reich.人类遗传学与政治作为互利资源:第三帝国时期的威廉皇帝人类学、人类遗传与优生学研究所案例
J Hist Biol. 2006 Spring;39(1):41-88. doi: 10.1007/s10739-005-6532-7.
6
Watching the 'eugenic experiment' unfold: the mixed views of British eugenicists toward Nazi Germany in the early 1930s.目睹“优生学实验”的展开:20世纪30年代初英国优生学家对纳粹德国的复杂看法。
J Hist Biol. 2012 Spring;45(1):33-63. doi: 10.1007/s10739-010-9259-z.
7
Eugenics--a side effect of progressivism? analysis of the role of scientific and medical elites in the rise and fall of eugenics in pre-war Poland.优生学——进步主义的副作用?战前波兰科学与医学精英在优生学兴衰中所起作用的分析
Vesalius. 2010 Jun;16(1):10-5.
8
Was Margaret Sanger a racist?玛格丽特·桑格是种族主义者吗?
Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 Jan-Feb;17(1):44-6.
9
Eugenics discourse and racial improvement in Republican China (1911-1949).民国时期(1911 - 1949年)的优生学话语与种族改良
Uisahak. 2010 Dec 31;19(2):459-85.
10
Coming to grips with the limitations of science: infertility and heredity in American history. [Review of: Marsh, M; Ronner, W. The empty cradle: infertilitiy in America from colonial times to the present. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996; Paul, DB. Controlling human heredity: 1865 to the present. Humanities Press, 1995].正视科学的局限性:美国历史上的不孕与遗传。[评:马什,M;罗纳,W。《空荡荡的摇篮:从殖民时代至今的美国不孕问题》。约翰·霍普金斯大学出版社,1996年;保罗,DB。《控制人类遗传:1865年至今》。人文出版社,1995年]
Rev Am Hist. 1997 Sep;25(3):445-50.