Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, 4235 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843-4235, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Apr;31(2):772-780. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02379-y. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
Attribute amnesia, a phenomenon in which participants fail to report a just-attended attribute in a surprise test, reflects the importance of expectation in determining memory for attended information. To investigate how expectations arise in the context of attribute amnesia, the present study examined whether and how different response histories, independently of task instruction, can shape expectation, thereby driving or eliminating attribute amnesia. Participants were assigned to three groups and completed variations of the attribute amnesia task, where they were initially instructed to encode both target location and identity. Two groups of participants were probed four times on target identity before a critical identity probe, in one case intermittently while in the other case repeatedly during the first few trials. Another group of participants was never probed on identity until the critical trial, which occurred on the 370th trial (after many location probes). The results showed that, in spite of common task instruction, performance on the critical trial depended strongly on response history, with initial identity probes providing some protection against attribute amnesia and intermittent probes completely eliminating it. The findings suggest that the encoding of information into working memory is determined by task experience, independently of task instruction.
属性遗忘,即参与者在惊喜测试中未能报告刚刚注意到的属性的现象,反映了期望在确定对注意信息的记忆中的重要性。为了研究期望在属性遗忘的背景下是如何产生的,本研究考察了不同的反应历史(独立于任务指令)是否以及如何塑造期望,从而驱动或消除属性遗忘。参与者被分为三组,并完成了属性遗忘任务的变体,最初他们被指示同时编码目标位置和身份。两组参与者在关键身份探测前四次探测目标身份,一次是间歇性的,另一次是在最初几次试验中反复进行。另一组参与者直到关键试验才探测身份,关键试验发生在第 370 次试验(经过多次位置探测后)。结果表明,尽管任务指令相同,但关键试验的表现强烈依赖于反应历史,初始身份探测提供了一些对属性遗忘的保护,而间歇性探测则完全消除了属性遗忘。研究结果表明,信息在工作记忆中的编码是由任务经验决定的,而与任务指令无关。