• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期精神病中的社会劣势及其对临床表现、服务获取、参与和利用的影响。

Social disadvantage in early psychosis and its effect on clinical presentation and service access, engagement and use.

作者信息

Fordham Eliza, Gao Caroline X, Filia Kate, O'Donoghue Brian, Smith Catherine, Francey Shona, Rickwood Debra, Telford Nic, Thompson Andrew, Brown Ellie

机构信息

Orygen, Parkville, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.

Orygen, Parkville, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2023 Oct;328:115478. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115478. Epub 2023 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115478
PMID:37717545
Abstract

Incidence of psychosis varies geographically due to factors such as social disadvantage. Whether this influences the clinical presentation and/or engagement of those experiencing psychosis remains relatively understudied. This study analysed data from young people across Australia accessing ultra-high risk (UHR) or first episode psychosis (FEP) services delivered through the headspace Early Psychosis (hEP) program between June 2017 and March 2021. The cohort was categorised into low, middle, and high tertiles of social disadvantage using the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage (IRSD). Data from 3089 participants aged 15-25 were included (1515 UHR, 1574 FEP). The low and middle tertiles for both cohorts had greater percentages of those not in education or employment (NEET), with First Nations or culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Clinical presentations to services were similar across all tertiles in both cohorts, however, functioning at presentation varied significantly within the FEP cohort. Significantly lower numbers of direct services were provided in the low tertile of both cohorts, with significantly poorer engagement in the initial three-months also occurring for these young people. This variation in early psychosis service patterns associated with geographical variation in social deprivation demonstrates the need for further research and fine tuning of national early psychosis services.

摘要

由于社会劣势等因素,精神病的发病率在地理上存在差异。这是否会影响精神病患者的临床表现和/或参与度仍相对缺乏研究。本研究分析了2017年6月至2021年3月期间,澳大利亚各地通过headspace早期精神病(hEP)项目获得超高风险(UHR)或首次发作精神病(FEP)服务的年轻人的数据。使用相对社会经济劣势指数(IRSD)将该队列分为社会劣势的低、中、高三分位组。纳入了3089名年龄在15 - 25岁之间的参与者的数据(1515名UHR,1574名FEP)。两个队列的低三分位组和中三分位组中,未接受教育或就业(NEET)的、具有原住民或文化和语言背景多样的人群比例更高。两个队列中所有三分位组向服务机构的临床表现相似,然而,FEP队列中就诊时的功能存在显著差异。两个队列的低三分位组提供的直接服务数量显著更少,这些年轻人在最初三个月的参与度也显著更低。这种与社会剥夺地理差异相关的早期精神病服务模式的差异表明,需要对国家早期精神病服务进行进一步研究和微调。

相似文献

1
Social disadvantage in early psychosis and its effect on clinical presentation and service access, engagement and use.早期精神病中的社会劣势及其对临床表现、服务获取、参与和利用的影响。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Oct;328:115478. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115478. Epub 2023 Sep 10.
2
Vocational functioning in young people accessing services for first-episode psychosis and ultra-high risk of psychosis: A longitudinal naturalistic cohort study.年轻人接受首发精神病和超高精神病风险服务的职业功能:一项纵向自然队列研究。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;58(10):875-884. doi: 10.1177/00048674241261778. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
3
What impact did the COVID-19 pandemic have on psychosis and the delivery of early intervention psychosis services?新冠疫情对精神病和早期干预精神病服务的提供有什么影响?
Schizophr Res. 2024 Oct;272:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.08.013. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
4
The clinical and functional outcomes of a large naturalistic cohort of young people accessing national early psychosis services.大样本自然队列的年轻人接受国家早期精神病服务的临床和功能结局。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2022 Oct;56(10):1265-1276. doi: 10.1177/00048674211061285. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
5
Ten-year audit of clients presenting to a specialised service for young people experiencing or at increased risk for psychosis.针对向一家为有精神病体验或处于精神病高风险的年轻人提供的专业服务机构求助的客户进行的十年审计。
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Nov 18;14:318. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0318-4.
6
Incidence of treated first episode psychosis from an Australian early intervention service and its association with neighbourhood characteristics.澳大利亚早期干预服务中经治疗的首发精神病的发病率及其与社区特征的关系。
Schizophr Res. 2019 Jul;209:206-211. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.04.017. Epub 2019 May 24.
7
The rates and determinants of disengagement and subsequent re-engagement in young people with first-episode psychosis.首发精神病青年中断和随后重新参与的比率和决定因素。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Aug;54(8):945-953. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01698-7. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
8
Neighbourhood level social deprivation and the risk of psychotic disorders: a systematic review.社区层面的社会剥夺与精神障碍风险:一项系统综述
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;51(7):941-50. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1233-4. Epub 2016 May 13.
9
Characterization of young people with first episode psychosis or at ultra-high risk: the Reggio Emilia At-Risk Mental States (ReARMS) program.青少年首发精神病或超高危人群的特征:雷焦艾米利亚高危精神状态(ReARMS)研究计划。
Riv Psichiatr. 2019 Nov-Dec;54(6):254-263. doi: 10.1708/3281.32544.
10
Correlates of substance use in a large naturalistic cohort of young people with early and emerging psychosis.物质使用与早期和初期精神病的大量自然队列青少年的相关性。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2023 Oct;58(10):1447-1456. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02436-w. Epub 2023 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A meta-analysis of the role of neighborhood deprivation in psychotic disorders.社区贫困在精神障碍中作用的荟萃分析。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02980-7.