• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年轻人接受首发精神病和超高精神病风险服务的职业功能:一项纵向自然队列研究。

Vocational functioning in young people accessing services for first-episode psychosis and ultra-high risk of psychosis: A longitudinal naturalistic cohort study.

机构信息

Child and Adolescent Mental Health Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Mental Health Services CPH, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;58(10):875-884. doi: 10.1177/00048674241261778. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1177/00048674241261778
PMID:39075845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11420578/
Abstract

AIMS

Young people with first-episode psychosis (FEP) or at ultra-high risk (UHR) of psychosis often have lower vocational engagement than their peers. This study examines the effect of treatment in early intervention for psychosis services in Australia on engagement in education and employment.

METHODS

This is a naturalistic sample of young people aged 12-25 with FEP ( = 1574) and UHR ( = 1515), accessing treatment in the Early Psychosis (hEP) programme. Engagement in education and employment was assessed at baseline and every 90 days in treatment. Mixed effects logistic regression were used to analyse changes over time.

RESULTS

On entering the hEP programme, approximately 49% of the young people with FEP and 28% of the young people at UHR status identified as Not in Education, Employment or Training (NEET). The odds of being NEET were reduced by 27% (95% confidence interval = [14, 39]) for every 6 months treatment for the FEP group, but no change in NEET status was observed in the UHR group. In both groups, absence from daily activities was significantly reduced during time in treatment.

CONCLUSION

While there are methodological challenges analysing real-world non-control group cohort data, the findings indicate positive effects of the hEP programme on vocational and daily activity engagement for young people with FEP and at UHR status. A large proportion of the young people still identified as NEET after receiving treatment services, suggesting further refinement to ensure targeted and consistent vocational support throughout care.

摘要

目的

首发精神病(FEP)或精神病超高风险(UHR)的年轻人通常比同龄人从事职业的比例更低。本研究旨在调查澳大利亚精神病早期干预服务中,治疗对年轻人参与教育和就业的影响。

方法

这是一项自然样本研究,共纳入 12-25 岁的 FEP(n=1574)和 UHR(n=1515)患者,他们都在早期精神病(hEP)项目中接受治疗。在基线和治疗期间每 90 天评估他们的教育和就业参与情况。采用混合效应逻辑回归分析随时间的变化。

结果

进入 hEP 项目时,约 49%的 FEP 患者和 28%的 UHR 患者未接受教育、就业或培训(NEET)。对于 FEP 组,每接受 6 个月的治疗,其成为 NEET 的可能性降低 27%(95%置信区间为 [14, 39]),而 UHR 组则没有观察到 NEET 状态的变化。在两组中,在治疗期间,不参与日常活动的比例显著降低。

结论

虽然分析真实世界非对照组队列数据存在方法学挑战,但这些发现表明 hEP 项目对 FEP 和 UHR 状态的年轻人的职业和日常活动参与具有积极影响。尽管接受了治疗服务,但仍有很大一部分年轻人被认为是 NEET,这表明需要进一步改进,以确保在整个治疗过程中提供有针对性和一致的职业支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ec7/11420578/1fffbe3c926b/10.1177_00048674241261778-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ec7/11420578/1fffbe3c926b/10.1177_00048674241261778-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ec7/11420578/1fffbe3c926b/10.1177_00048674241261778-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Vocational functioning in young people accessing services for first-episode psychosis and ultra-high risk of psychosis: A longitudinal naturalistic cohort study.年轻人接受首发精神病和超高精神病风险服务的职业功能:一项纵向自然队列研究。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;58(10):875-884. doi: 10.1177/00048674241261778. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
2
What impact did the COVID-19 pandemic have on psychosis and the delivery of early intervention psychosis services?新冠疫情对精神病和早期干预精神病服务的提供有什么影响?
Schizophr Res. 2024 Oct;272:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.08.013. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
3
Predictors of vocational activity over the first year in inner-city early intervention in psychosis services.城市内精神病早期干预服务第一年职业活动的预测因素。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;9(6):447-58. doi: 10.1111/eip.12125. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
4
Social disadvantage in early psychosis and its effect on clinical presentation and service access, engagement and use.早期精神病中的社会劣势及其对临床表现、服务获取、参与和利用的影响。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Oct;328:115478. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115478. Epub 2023 Sep 10.
5
The clinical and functional outcomes of a large naturalistic cohort of young people accessing national early psychosis services.大样本自然队列的年轻人接受国家早期精神病服务的临床和功能结局。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2022 Oct;56(10):1265-1276. doi: 10.1177/00048674211061285. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
6
The rates and determinants of disengagement and subsequent re-engagement in young people with first-episode psychosis.首发精神病青年中断和随后重新参与的比率和决定因素。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Aug;54(8):945-953. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01698-7. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
7
Improving vocational outcomes in first-episode psychosis by addressing cognitive impairments using Cognitive Adaptation Training.通过认知适应训练解决认知障碍来改善首发精神病的职业结局。
Work. 2017;56(4):581-589. doi: 10.3233/WOR-172517.
8
Characterization of young people with first episode psychosis or at ultra-high risk: the Reggio Emilia At-Risk Mental States (ReARMS) program.青少年首发精神病或超高危人群的特征:雷焦艾米利亚高危精神状态(ReARMS)研究计划。
Riv Psichiatr. 2019 Nov-Dec;54(6):254-263. doi: 10.1708/3281.32544.
9
Evidence of the effectiveness of a specialist vocational intervention following first episode psychosis: a naturalistic prospective cohort study.首发精神病后专科职业干预有效性的证据:一项自然前瞻性队列研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2010 Jan;45(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0034-4. Epub 2009 Mar 21.
10
Improving vocational outcomes of service users in an Early Intervention in Psychosis service.提高精神病早期干预服务使用者的职业结果。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;8(1):98-102. doi: 10.1111/eip.12043. Epub 2013 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
The clinical and functional outcomes of a large naturalistic cohort of young people accessing national early psychosis services.大样本自然队列的年轻人接受国家早期精神病服务的临床和功能结局。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2022 Oct;56(10):1265-1276. doi: 10.1177/00048674211061285. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
2
Social and occupational recovery in early psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions.早期精神病患者的社会和职业康复:心理社会干预的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2023 Apr;53(5):1787-1798. doi: 10.1017/S003329172100341X. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
3
Employment and relationship outcomes in first-episode psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.
首发精神病患者的就业和人际关系结局:纵向研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Schizophr Res. 2021 May;231:122-133. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.03.013. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
4
The utility of a fidelity measure to monitor implementation of new early psychosis services across Australia.效标实用性可用于监测澳大利亚各地新的早期精神病服务的实施情况。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;15(5):1382-1388. doi: 10.1111/eip.13074. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
5
An Examination of the Community Participation Interests of Young Adults with Serious Mental Illnesses.探讨患有严重精神疾病的青年成年人的社区参与意愿。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct;47(4):526-543. doi: 10.1007/s11414-019-09678-0.
6
Societal Costs of Schizophrenia in Denmark: A Nationwide Matched Controlled Study of Patients and Spouses Before and After Initial Diagnosis.丹麦精神分裂症的社会成本:一项在初始诊断前后对患者和配偶进行的全国匹配对照研究。
Schizophr Bull. 2020 Jan 4;46(1):68-77. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbz041.
7
Understanding what it means to be socially included for people with a lived experience of mental illness.理解有精神疾病经历的人被社会包容的含义。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;65(5):413-424. doi: 10.1177/0020764019852657. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
8
Caught in the "NEET Trap": The Intersection Between Vocational Inactivity and Disengagement From an Early Intervention Service for Psychosis.陷入“NEET 陷阱”:职业活动缺失与早期精神病干预服务脱节。
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Apr 1;70(4):302-308. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800319. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
9
Individual placement and support for vocational recovery in first-episode psychosis: randomised controlled trial.个体化职业康复安置和支持在首发精神病中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Br J Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;214(2):76-82. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.191. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
10
Comparison of Early Intervention Services vs Treatment as Usual for Early-Phase Psychosis: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression.早期精神病干预服务与常规治疗的比较:系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 1;75(6):555-565. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0623.