• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国驾驶员特征导致的分心驾驶的流行率。

Prevalence of distracted driving by driver characteristics in the United States.

机构信息

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, United States.

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, United States.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2023 Sep;86:346-356. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.07.013. Epub 2023 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2023.07.013
PMID:37718062
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Distracted driving is a long-standing traffic safety concern, though common secondary tasks continually evolve. The goal of this study was to measure the prevalence of self-reported distracted driving behaviors, including activities made possible in recent years by smartphones.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide survey of 2,013 U.S. licensed drivers (ages 16 +). We created four aggregate distraction categories from 18 individual secondary tasks to estimate the proportion of drivers study-wide and by demographic characteristics belonging to each category, defined as those who regularly did (during most or all drives in the previous 30 days) one or more secondary task within each category. Logistic regression estimated the adjusted odds of drivers belonging to each aggregate distraction category by demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

Sixty-five percent of drivers reported doing at least one of the 18 secondary tasks regularly, and half did at least one device-based task regularly in the past 30 days. Non-device task prevalence trended downward with age, while device-based task prevalence was consistent among younger drivers before declining beginning with age 35. Males (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.16, 2.02), parents of children ages 18 and younger (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.10, 1.96), and participants who drive in the gig economy (OR, 3.85; 95% CI, 2.73, 5.43) had higher adjusted odds of engaging in "modern" device-based distractions enabled by smartphones (e.g., making video calls, watching videos, using social media) than other drivers. Many drivers are using hands-free capabilities when available for tasks, but for some tasks more than others.

CONCLUSIONS

Regular distracted driving is widespread with most behavior concentrated among drivers younger than age 50, though no age group or other demographic studied abstains.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

Stakeholders can use these findings to develop countermeasures for distracted driving by targeting specific secondary tasks and the demographics most likely to report regularly doing them.

摘要

简介

分心驾驶是一个长期存在的交通安全问题,尽管常见的次要任务在不断发展。本研究的目的是测量自我报告的分心驾驶行为的发生率,包括近年来智能手机带来的活动。

方法

我们对 2013 名美国有驾照的司机(年龄 16 岁及以上)进行了全国性调查。我们从 18 项次要任务中创建了四个综合分心类别,以估计研究范围内和按人口统计学特征属于每个类别的司机比例,定义为在过去 30 天内的大多数或所有驾驶过程中,在每个类别中定期进行一项或多项次要任务的司机。逻辑回归估计了按人口统计学特征属于每个综合分心类别的司机的调整后几率。

结果

65%的司机报告定期进行至少一项 18 项次要任务中的一项,过去 30 天内有一半的司机定期进行至少一项基于设备的任务。非设备任务的流行趋势随着年龄的增长而下降,而年轻司机的设备相关任务流行趋势在 35 岁开始下降。男性(OR,1.53;95%CI,1.16,2.02)、有 18 岁及以下子女的父母(OR,1.47;95%CI,1.10,1.96)和从事零工经济的参与者(OR,3.85;95%CI,2.73,5.43)进行“现代”智能手机支持的设备相关分心行为(例如,打视频电话、看视频、使用社交媒体)的调整后几率高于其他司机。许多司机在可用时使用免提功能,但对于某些任务比其他任务更频繁。

结论

定期分心驾驶非常普遍,大多数行为集中在 50 岁以下的司机中,但没有任何年龄组或其他研究中的人口统计学特征不参与。

实用意义

利益相关者可以使用这些发现,通过针对最有可能定期进行特定次要任务的人群,为分心驾驶制定对策。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of distracted driving by driver characteristics in the United States.美国驾驶员特征导致的分心驾驶的流行率。
J Safety Res. 2023 Sep;86:346-356. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.07.013. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
2
Teens' distracted driving behavior: Prevalence and predictors.青少年分心驾驶行为:流行率和预测因素。
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:157-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
3
The effects of age on crash risk associated with driver distraction.年龄对与驾驶员分神相关的碰撞风险的影响。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):258-265. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw234.
4
Prevalence and trends of distracted driving in Canada.加拿大分心驾驶的流行趋势和变化。
J Safety Res. 2021 Feb;76:118-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.12.005. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
5
Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers.道路基础设施和交通复杂性对分心驾驶者速度适应行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Apr;101:67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
6
Distracted Driving Among Patients with Trauma Attending Fracture Clinics in Canada: The Canadian Multicenter DRIVSAFE Study.加拿大创伤患者在骨折门诊就诊期间的分散驾驶行为:加拿大多中心 DRIVSAFE 研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Jun 1;104(11):971-979. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.01184. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
7
Use of smartphone apps while driving: Variations on driving performances and perceived risks.驾驶时使用智能手机应用程序:驾驶表现和感知风险的变化。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Apr;198:107474. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107474. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
8
Driver distraction by smartphone use (WhatsApp) in different age groups.不同年龄段司机使用智能手机(WhatsApp)导致的分神。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Aug;117:239-249. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 May 1.
9
How are different sources of distraction associated with at-fault crashes among drivers of different age gender groups?不同年龄和性别的驾驶员因不同分心源而发生事故过错的情况如何?
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Feb;165:106505. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106505. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
10
A survey of distracted driving and electronic device use among app-based and taxi drivers.一项关于基于应用程序的司机和出租车司机分心驾驶及电子设备使用情况的调查。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(sup1):S27-S31. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1935905. Epub 2021 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Problematic Smartphone and Social Media Use Among Adults in France: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.了解法国成年人中存在问题的智能手机和社交媒体使用情况:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Mar 6;12:e63431. doi: 10.2196/63431.
2
Evaluating a Virtual Reality Game to Enhance Teen Distracted Driving Education: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.评估虚拟现实游戏以增强青少年分心驾驶教育:混合方法试点研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 26;8:e60674. doi: 10.2196/60674.