• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大分心驾驶的流行趋势和变化。

Prevalence and trends of distracted driving in Canada.

机构信息

Traffic Injury Research Foundation, 171 Nepean Street, Ottawa, ON K2P 0B4, Canada.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2021 Feb;76:118-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.12.005. Epub 2020 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2020.12.005
PMID:33653542
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluates prevalence and trends in distracted driving in Canada based on multiple indicators collected from the Road Safety Monitor (RSM) and Canada's National Fatality Database maintained by the Traffic Injury Research Foundation (TIRF).

METHOD

Data from the RSM on self-reported distracted driving behaviors were analyzed using multivariate techniques including logistic regression analysis in various years spanning from 2004 to 2019. Data from TIRF's National Fatality Database from 2000 to 2016 were also analyzed using piecewise regression analysis to evaluate trends and prevalence of driver distraction.

RESULTS

Significantly more Canadians reported talking on their phone hands-free or handheld phone while driving in 2019 compared to 2010. There was a 102% increase in the percentage that reported texting while driving in 2019 (9.7%) compared to 2010 (4.8%). For every 10-year increase in age, drivers were 44% less likely to text, 38% less likely to use a handheld phone, and 28% less likely to use a hands-free phone. Males were 62% more likely to use a handheld phone and 50% more likely to use a hands-free phone than females. Findings related to drivers' perceived danger of distracted driving and attitudes are also presented. Although the number of distraction-related fatalities has not increased substantially from 2000 to 2016, the percentage of all fatalities where distraction was a contributing factor has increased. Unlike drinking drivers, distracted drivers more often kill other road users in crashes than kill themselves.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, while most Canadians appear to understand that one of the high-risk forms of distracted driving (i.e., texting while driving) is indeed dangerous, there is a minority who are unaware of, or resistant to, this fact. Practical Applications: Enforcement activities and education initiatives to combat distracted driving ought to be tailored to the target audience based on the patterns uncovered.

摘要

简介

本研究基于从 Road Safety Monitor(RSM)和由 Traffic Injury Research Foundation(TIRF)维护的加拿大国家死亡数据库中收集的多个指标,评估了加拿大分心驾驶的流行率和趋势。

方法

使用多元技术分析了 RSM 上关于自我报告的分心驾驶行为的数据,包括 2004 年至 2019 年期间的逻辑回归分析。还使用分段回归分析了 TIRF 的国家死亡数据库中的数据,以评估驾驶员分心的趋势和流行率。

结果

与 2010 年相比,2019 年报告在开车时使用免提电话或手持电话通话的加拿大人明显更多。与 2010 年(4.8%)相比,报告在开车时发短信的比例增加了 102%(2019 年为 9.7%)。与每增加 10 岁的年龄相比,驾驶员发短信的可能性降低了 44%,使用手持电话的可能性降低了 38%,使用免提电话的可能性降低了 28%。与驾驶员对分心驾驶的危险感知和态度相关的发现也被提出。尽管 2000 年至 2016 年分心相关死亡人数没有大幅增加,但分心是造成所有死亡人数的因素的百分比有所增加。与酒后驾车司机不同,分心驾车司机在事故中更有可能杀死其他道路使用者,而不是自杀。

结论

总之,尽管大多数加拿大人似乎都知道其中一种高风险形式的分心驾驶(即开车时发短信)确实很危险,但也有一小部分人对此一无所知或不以为然。实用应用:打击分心驾驶的执法活动和教育计划应该根据发现的模式针对目标受众进行定制。

相似文献

1
Prevalence and trends of distracted driving in Canada.加拿大分心驾驶的流行趋势和变化。
J Safety Res. 2021 Feb;76:118-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.12.005. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
2
Demographic characteristics and trends of cell phone use while driving citations in selected states in the United States, 2010-2020.2010-2020 年美国部分州开车时使用手机罚单的人口统计学特征和趋势。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(6):788-794. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2351605. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
3
Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008.美国 1999 年至 2008 年因分心驾驶导致的死亡趋势。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2213-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.187179. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
4
Prevalence and trends of drugged driving in Canada.加拿大药物影响下驾驶的患病率及趋势。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Feb;99(Pt A):236-241. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.12.008. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
5
Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers.道路基础设施和交通复杂性对分心驾驶者速度适应行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Apr;101:67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
6
Changes in the sources of distracted driving among Northern Virginia drivers in 2014 and 2018: A comparison of results from two roadside observation surveys.2014 年和 2018 年弗吉尼亚北部司机分散驾驶源的变化:两项路边观察调查结果的比较。
J Safety Res. 2019 Feb;68:131-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
7
Mobile phone use among commercial drivers in Ghana: An important threat to road safety.加纳商业司机使用手机:对道路安全的一项重大威胁。
Ghana Med J. 2018 Sep;52(3):122-126. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v52i3.3.
8
Self-regulation of driving speed among distracted drivers: An application of driver behavioral adaptation theory.分心驾驶者的行驶速度自我调节:驾驶员行为适应理论的应用
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Aug 18;18(6):599-605. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1278628. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
9
Self-reported handheld device use while driving.自述驾驶时使用手持设备。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Apr;125:106-115. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.01.032. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
10
Talking on hands-free and handheld cellphones while driving in association with handheld phone bans.在实施手持电话禁令的情况下,开车时使用免提和手持手机的情况。
J Safety Res. 2022 Dec;83:204-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.08.016. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Behaviors and Habits of Young Drivers Living in Small Urban Cities.生活在小型城市的年轻驾驶员的行为与习惯
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 26;22(2):165. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020165.
2
Neuroanatomical correlates of distracted straight driving performance: a driving simulator MRI study across the lifespan.分心直线驾驶表现的神经解剖学关联:一项跨生命周期的驾驶模拟器MRI研究
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Apr 19;16:1369179. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1369179. eCollection 2024.
3
Texting While Driving: A Literature Review on Driving Simulator Studies.
文本驾驶:驾驶模拟器研究文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4354. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054354.
4
Understanding the domain of driving distraction with knowledge graphs.利用知识图谱理解驾驶分心领域。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 9;17(12):e0278822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278822. eCollection 2022.