Suppr超能文献

单一病例实验设计是否会促成国家临床优化研究所指南中所推荐的针对青少年焦虑及相关障碍的认知行为疗法干预措施的随机对照试验?一项系统综述。

Do single-case experimental designs lead to randomised controlled trials of cognitive behavioural therapy interventions for adolescent anxiety and related disorders recommended in the National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines? A systematic review.

作者信息

Cawthorne Tom, Käll Anton, Bennett Sophie, Baker Elena, Cheung Emily, Shafran Roz

机构信息

Royal Holloway University of London London UK.

Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust London UK.

出版信息

JCPP Adv. 2023 Jul 4;3(3):e12181. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12181. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is effective for 60% of adolescents with anxiety disorders, only 36% are in remission post-intervention. This indicates that more effective treatments are needed which should be reflected in the NICE guidelines. We hypothesised that Single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) may provide a framework for accelerating the development of novel interventions. The primary purpose of this review was to investigate whether SCEDs are currently followed by randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of CBT intervention for adolescent anxiety disorders named in the NICE guidelines. The secondary objective was to investigate whether using SCEDs prior to RCTs could be a helpful approach.

METHOD

For the primary search of SCEDs five databases were used (PsycINFO, PubMed, PsycArticles, Web of Science and ProQuest). Nineteen articles met eligibility criteria including a total of 107 participants. For the secondary search of RCTs named in the NICE guidelines for adolescent anxiety disorders 53 articles met inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review.

RESULTS

The 19 SCED studies included in the review were conducted with participants with a diverse range of anxiety disorders and across a range of CBT formats. Two of the SCEDs were followed by RCTs, but neither of these were named in the NICE guidelines for anxiety disorders. All of the SCEDs identified were rated as low quality with none meeting the criteria for the highest or second highest quality rating. From the secondary searches, none of the RCTs named in the NICE guide were preceded by SCEDs.

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that currently SCEDs were not followed by RCTs of CBT interventions named in the NICE guidelines for adolescent anxiety disorders. However, it was suggested that SCEDs may provide an important framework for the development of more effective interventions for adolescents with anxiety.

摘要

背景

尽管认知行为疗法(CBT)对60%的焦虑症青少年有效,但干预后只有36%的人症状缓解。这表明需要更有效的治疗方法,而这一点应在英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)的指南中有所体现。我们推测单病例实验设计(SCEDs)可能为加速新型干预措施的开发提供一个框架。本综述的主要目的是调查NICE指南中提及的针对青少年焦虑症的CBT干预随机对照试验(RCTs)目前是否遵循SCEDs。次要目的是研究在RCTs之前使用SCEDs是否可能是一种有益的方法。

方法

为了初步搜索SCEDs,使用了五个数据库(PsycINFO、PubMed、PsycArticles、科学引文索引和ProQuest)。19篇文章符合纳入标准,共涉及107名参与者。为了二次搜索NICE指南中提及的针对青少年焦虑症的RCTs,53篇文章符合纳入标准并被纳入系统评价。

结果

纳入综述的19项SCED研究针对患有多种焦虑症的参与者进行,采用了多种CBT形式。其中两项SCEDs之后进行了RCTs,但这两项均未在NICE焦虑症指南中被提及。所有确定的SCEDs均被评为低质量,没有一项符合最高或次高质量评级标准。从二次搜索结果来看,NICE指南中提及的RCTs之前均未进行过SCEDs。

结论

得出的结论是,目前NICE青少年焦虑症指南中提及的CBT干预RCTs并未遵循SCEDs。然而,有人建议SCEDs可能为开发针对焦虑症青少年的更有效干预措施提供一个重要框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfd0/10501697/570da52563b3/JCV2-3-e12181-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验