• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ChatGPT心理理论能力的可塑性:针对人格结构的个性化

The plasticity of ChatGPT's mentalizing abilities: personalization for personality structures.

作者信息

Hadar-Shoval Dorit, Elyoseph Zohar, Lvovsky Maya

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Educational Counseling, The Center for Psychobiological Research, Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Emek Yezreel, Israel.

Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 1;14:1234397. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1234397. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1234397
PMID:37720897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10503434/
Abstract

This study evaluated the potential of ChatGPT, a large language model, to generate mentalizing-like abilities that are tailored to a specific personality structure and/or psychopathology. Mentalization is the ability to understand and interpret one's own and others' mental states, including thoughts, feelings, and intentions. Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and Schizoid Personality Disorder (SPD) are characterized by distinct patterns of emotional regulation. Individuals with BPD tend to experience intense and unstable emotions, while individuals with SPD tend to experience flattened or detached emotions. We used ChatGPT's free version 23.3 and assessed the extent to which its responses akin to emotional awareness (EA) were customized to the distinctive personality structure-character characterized by Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and Schizoid Personality Disorder (SPD), employing the Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS). ChatGPT was able to accurately describe the emotional reactions of individuals with BPD as more intense, complex, and rich than those with SPD. This finding suggests that ChatGPT can generate mentalizing-like responses consistent with a range of psychopathologies in line with clinical and theoretical knowledge. However, the study also raises concerns regarding the potential for stigmas or biases related to mental diagnoses to impact the validity and usefulness of chatbot-based clinical interventions. We emphasize the need for the responsible development and deployment of chatbot-based interventions in mental health, which considers diverse theoretical frameworks.

摘要

本研究评估了大型语言模型ChatGPT生成针对特定人格结构和/或精神病理学的类心理化能力的潜力。心理化是理解和解释自己及他人心理状态的能力,包括思想、情感和意图。边缘型人格障碍(BPD)和分裂样人格障碍(SPD)具有不同的情绪调节模式。BPD患者往往经历强烈且不稳定的情绪,而SPD患者往往经历平淡或疏离的情绪。我们使用了ChatGPT的23.3免费版本,并采用情绪觉察量表(LEAS)评估其类似于情绪觉察(EA)的回答在多大程度上针对由边缘型人格障碍(BPD)和分裂样人格障碍(SPD)所特有的独特人格结构特征进行了定制。ChatGPT能够准确地将BPD患者的情绪反应描述为比SPD患者更强烈、更复杂和更丰富。这一发现表明,ChatGPT可以生成与一系列精神病理学相一致的类心理化反应,符合临床和理论知识。然而,该研究也引发了人们对与精神诊断相关的污名或偏见可能影响基于聊天机器人的临床干预的有效性和实用性的担忧。我们强调在心理健康领域负责任地开发和部署基于聊天机器人的干预措施的必要性,这需要考虑多种理论框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e088/10503434/1375d8e3a4d4/fpsyt-14-1234397-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e088/10503434/1375d8e3a4d4/fpsyt-14-1234397-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e088/10503434/1375d8e3a4d4/fpsyt-14-1234397-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The plasticity of ChatGPT's mentalizing abilities: personalization for personality structures.ChatGPT心理理论能力的可塑性:针对人格结构的个性化
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 1;14:1234397. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1234397. eCollection 2023.
2
ChatGPT outperforms humans in emotional awareness evaluations.ChatGPT在情绪感知评估方面表现优于人类。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 26;14:1199058. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1199058. eCollection 2023.
3
Capacity of Generative AI to Interpret Human Emotions From Visual and Textual Data: Pilot Evaluation Study.生成式人工智能从视觉和文本数据中解读人类情感的能力:初步评估研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Feb 6;11:e54369. doi: 10.2196/54369.
4
Do my emotions show or not? Problems with transparency estimation in women with borderline personality disorder features.我的情绪是否表现出来了?边缘型人格特质障碍女性的透明度估计问题。
Personal Disord. 2022 May;13(3):288-299. doi: 10.1037/per0000504. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
5
"Feeling Invisible": Individuals With Borderline Personality Disorder Underestimate the Transparency of Their Emotions.“感觉被忽视”:边缘型人格障碍个体低估了自身情绪的透明度。
J Pers Disord. 2023 Apr;37(2):213-232. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2023.37.2.213.
6
Mentalization mediates the relationship between borderline personality features and internalizing and externalizing psychopathology in adolescents.心理化在青少年边缘型人格特征与内化性和外化性精神病理学之间的关系中起中介作用。
Scand J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Psychol. 2019 May 30;7:1-7. doi: 10.21307/sjcapp-2019-002. eCollection 2019.
7
Self-reported patterns of impairments in mentalization, attachment, and psychopathology among clinically referred adolescents with and without borderline personality pathology.有和没有边缘型人格障碍的临床转诊青少年在心理化、依恋和精神病理学方面自我报告的损伤模式。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2017 Feb 14;4:4. doi: 10.1186/s40479-017-0055-7. eCollection 2017.
8
Borderline Personality Disorder and Mood Disorders: Mentalizing as a Framework for Integrated Treatment.边缘型人格障碍与情绪障碍:将心理化作为综合治疗的框架
J Clin Psychol. 2015 Aug;71(8):792-804. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22206. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
9
Examining the Relationship Between Executive Functions and Mentalizing Abilities of Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder.探究边缘型人格障碍患者执行功能与心理化能力之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 14;11:1583. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01583. eCollection 2020.
10
The Italian version of the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire: Validity data for adults and its association with severity of borderline personality disorder.《反思功能问卷》意大利语版:成人效标关联效度及其与边缘型人格障碍严重程度的关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206433. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
The Application and Ethical Implication of Generative AI in Mental Health: Systematic Review.生成式人工智能在心理健康领域的应用及伦理意义:系统综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Jun 27;12:e70610. doi: 10.2196/70610.
2
A step toward the future? evaluating GenAI QPR simulation training for mental health gatekeepers.迈向未来的一步?评估针对心理健康守门人的生成式人工智能QPR模拟训练。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 11;12:1599900. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1599900. eCollection 2025.
3
Applying language models for suicide prevention: evaluating news article adherence to WHO reporting guidelines.

本文引用的文献

1
Beyond human expertise: the promise and limitations of ChatGPT in suicide risk assessment.超越人类专业知识:ChatGPT在自杀风险评估中的前景与局限
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 1;14:1213141. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1213141. eCollection 2023.
2
ChatGPT outperforms humans in emotional awareness evaluations.ChatGPT在情绪感知评估方面表现优于人类。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 26;14:1199058. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1199058. eCollection 2023.
3
"I Do Not Know How You Feel and How I Feel About That": Mentalizing Impairments in Machado-Joseph Disease.
应用语言模型预防自杀:评估新闻文章对世界卫生组织报告指南的遵循情况。
Npj Ment Health Res. 2025 Jun 20;4(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s44184-025-00139-5.
4
A Scoping Review of AI-Driven Digital Interventions in Mental Health Care: Mapping Applications Across Screening, Support, Monitoring, Prevention, and Clinical Education.人工智能驱动的心理健康护理数字干预措施的范围综述:梳理筛查、支持、监测、预防及临床教育方面的应用
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 21;13(10):1205. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13101205.
5
Evaluating Generative AI in Mental Health: Systematic Review of Capabilities and Limitations.评估生成式人工智能在心理健康领域的应用:能力与局限的系统综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 May 15;12:e70014. doi: 10.2196/70014.
6
The Applications of Large Language Models in Mental Health: Scoping Review.大语言模型在心理健康领域的应用:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 5;27:e69284. doi: 10.2196/69284.
7
The Feasibility of Large Language Models in Verbal Comprehension Assessment: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.大语言模型在言语理解评估中的可行性:混合方法可行性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 24;9:e68347. doi: 10.2196/68347.
8
The externalization of internal experiences in psychotherapy through generative artificial intelligence: a theoretical, clinical, and ethical analysis.通过生成式人工智能在心理治疗中实现内在体验的外化:理论、临床及伦理分析
Front Digit Health. 2025 Feb 4;7:1512273. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1512273. eCollection 2025.
9
Large language models outperform general practitioners in identifying complex cases of childhood anxiety.在识别儿童焦虑复杂病例方面,大型语言模型的表现优于全科医生。
Digit Health. 2024 Dec 15;10:20552076241294182. doi: 10.1177/20552076241294182. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
10
Large Language Models for Mental Health Applications: Systematic Review.大型语言模型在精神健康应用中的应用:系统评价。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Oct 18;11:e57400. doi: 10.2196/57400.
“我不知道你有何感受,我对那件事的感受如何”:脑腱黄瘤营养不良症的心理理论障碍。
Cerebellum. 2024 Aug;23(4):1265-1272. doi: 10.1007/s12311-023-01536-2. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
4
A Call to Action on Assessing and Mitigating Bias in Artificial Intelligence Applications for Mental Health.呼吁重视并减轻人工智能应用于精神健康领域中的偏见
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Sep;18(5):1062-1096. doi: 10.1177/17456916221134490. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
5
Assessing the Impact of Conversational Artificial Intelligence in the Treatment of Stress and Anxiety in Aging Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.评估对话式人工智能对老年人压力和焦虑治疗的影响:随机对照试验。
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Sep 23;9(9):e38067. doi: 10.2196/38067.
6
Dissociation of basolateral and central amygdala effective connectivity predicts the stability of emotion-related impulsivity in adolescents and emerging adults with borderline personality symptoms: a resting-state fMRI study.基底外侧杏仁核与中央杏仁核有效连接的解离可预测边缘型人格症状青少年和新兴成年人情绪相关冲动性的稳定性:一项静息态功能磁共振成像研究
Psychol Med. 2023 Jun;53(8):3533-3547. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722000101. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
7
Artificial Intelligence and Chatbots in Psychiatry.人工智能与精神病学中的聊天机器人。
Psychiatr Q. 2022 Mar;93(1):249-253. doi: 10.1007/s11126-022-09973-8. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
8
An fMRI study of cognitive reappraisal in major depressive disorder and borderline personality disorder.一项 fMRI 研究对重度抑郁症和边缘型人格障碍的认知重评。
Eur Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 1;64(1):e56. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.2231.
9
Artificial Intelligence for Mental Health Care: Clinical Applications, Barriers, Facilitators, and Artificial Wisdom.人工智能在精神卫生保健中的应用:临床应用、障碍、促进因素和人工智能智慧。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2021 Sep;6(9):856-864. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
10
A Call to Action. A Critical Review of Mental Health Related Anti-stigma Campaigns.行动呼吁:心理健康相关反污名运动的批判性回顾
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 8;8:569539. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.569539. eCollection 2020.