• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Social Psychological Perspectives on Political Polarization: Insights and Implications for Climate Change.政治两极分化的社会心理学视角:对气候变化的见解与启示
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2025 Jan;20(1):115-141. doi: 10.1177/17456916231186409. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
2
Social Climate Science: A New Vista for Psychological Science.社会气候科学:心理学科学的新视角。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Sep;11(5):632-650. doi: 10.1177/1745691616639726.
3
Psychological Barriers to Bipartisan Public Support for Climate Policy.两党公众支持气候政策的心理障碍。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Jul;13(4):492-507. doi: 10.1177/1745691617748966.
4
Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.感知美国的政治极化:党派认同强度和态度极端性加剧了感知到的党派分歧。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;10(2):145-58. doi: 10.1177/1745691615569849.
5
The differential impact of climate interventions along the political divide in 60 countries.60 个国家中政治分歧沿线气候干预措施的差异影响。
Nat Commun. 2024 May 8;15(1):3885. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48112-8.
6
Political polarization of conservation issues in the era of COVID-19: An examination of partisan perspectives and priorities in the United States.新冠疫情时代保护问题的政治两极分化:对美国党派观点和优先事项的审视。
J Nat Conserv. 2022 Jun;67:126176. doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126176. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
7
Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices.政治意识形态影响能源效率态度和选择。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 4;110(23):9314-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218453110. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
8
How issue frames shape beliefs about the importance of climate change policy across ideological and partisan groups.议题框架如何塑造不同意识形态和党派群体对气候变化政策重要性的看法。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 20;12(7):e0181401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181401. eCollection 2017.
9
'Them' without 'us': negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil.没有“我们”的“他们”:巴西的负面身份认同与情感两极分化
Political Res Exch. 2022 Sep 5;4(1):2117635. doi: 10.1080/2474736X.2022.2117635. eCollection 2022.
10
Scaling Up Change: A Critical Review and Practical Guide to Harnessing Social Norms for Climate Action.规模化变革:利用社会规范促进气候行动的批判性回顾与实用指南。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2022 Oct;23(2):50-97. doi: 10.1177/15291006221105279.

引用本文的文献

1
Most Christian American religious leaders silently believe in climate change, and informing their congregation can help open dialogue.大多数美国基督教宗教领袖暗自相信气候变化,向他们的会众宣传这一点有助于开启对话。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Apr;122(13):e2419705122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2419705122. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
2
Younger Americans are less politically polarized than older Americans about climate policies (but not about other policy domains).美国年轻人在气候政策方面比老年人的政治分歧更小(但在其他政策领域并非如此)。
PLoS One. 2024 May 15;19(5):e0302434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302434. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Politicization and Polarization in COVID-19 News Coverage.新冠疫情新闻报道中的政治化与两极分化。
Sci Commun. 2020 Oct;42(5):679-697. doi: 10.1177/1075547020950735.
2
Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures.超越西方、受过良好教育、工业化、富裕和民主(WEIRD)人群的道德:道德的法则网络如何在不同文化中变化。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Nov;125(5):1157-1188. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000470. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
3
Scaling Up Change: A Critical Review and Practical Guide to Harnessing Social Norms for Climate Action.规模化变革:利用社会规范促进气候行动的批判性回顾与实用指南。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2022 Oct;23(2):50-97. doi: 10.1177/15291006221105279.
4
Moral values predict county-level COVID-19 vaccination rates in the United States.道德价值观预测美国县级的 COVID-19 疫苗接种率。
Am Psychol. 2022 Sep;77(6):743-759. doi: 10.1037/amp0001020.
5
Addressing the climate crisis: An action plan for psychologists (summary).应对气候危机:心理学家行动计划(摘要)。
Am Psychol. 2022 Oct;77(7):799-811. doi: 10.1037/amp0001041. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
6
Americans experience a false social reality by underestimating popular climate policy support by nearly half.美国人低估了民众对气候政策的支持率,近一半人都生活在这种错误的社会现实中。
Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 23;13(1):4779. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32412-y.
7
Cognitive-motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts.社会交际背景下政治两极分化的认知动机机制。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2022;1(10):560-576. doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
8
Social norms explain prioritization of climate policy.社会规范解释了气候政策的优先次序。
Clim Change. 2022;173(1-2):10. doi: 10.1007/s10584-022-03396-x. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
9
Communicating doctors' consensus persistently increases COVID-19 vaccinations.持续沟通医生的共识可提高 COVID-19 疫苗接种率。
Nature. 2022 Jun;606(7914):542-549. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04805-y. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
10
Politicians polarize and experts depolarize public support for COVID-19 management policies across countries.各国的政治家使公众对新冠疫情管理政策产生分歧,而专家则使公众对这些政策的支持趋于一致。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jan 18;119(3). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117543119.

政治两极分化的社会心理学视角:对气候变化的见解与启示

Social Psychological Perspectives on Political Polarization: Insights and Implications for Climate Change.

作者信息

Cole Jennifer C, Gillis Ash J, van der Linden Sander, Cohen Mark A, Vandenbergh Michael P

机构信息

Climate Change Research Network, Vanderbilt University.

Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University.

出版信息

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2025 Jan;20(1):115-141. doi: 10.1177/17456916231186409. Epub 2023 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1177/17456916231186409
PMID:37722136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11720282/
Abstract

Political polarization is a barrier to enacting policy solutions to global issues. Social psychology has a rich history of studying polarization, and there is an important opportunity to define and refine its contributions to the present political realities. We do so in the context of one of the most pressing modern issues: climate change. We synthesize the literature on political polarization and its applications to climate change, and we propose lines of further research and intervention design. We focus on polarization in the United States, examining other countries when literature was available. The polarization literature emphasizes two types of mechanisms of political polarization: (1) individual-level psychological processes related to political ideology and (2) group-level psychological processes related to partisan identification. Interventions that address group-level processes can be more effective than those that address individual-level processes. Accordingly, we emphasize the promise of interventions leveraging superordinate identities, correcting misperceived norms, and having trusted leaders communicate about climate change. Behavioral interventions like these that are grounded in scientific research are one of our most promising tools to achieve the behavioral wedge that we need to address climate change and to make progress on other policy issues.

摘要

政治两极化是制定全球问题政策解决方案的障碍。社会心理学在研究两极化方面有着丰富的历史,当下有一个重要机会来界定并完善其对当前政治现实的贡献。我们在最紧迫的现代问题之一——气候变化的背景下开展此项工作。我们综合了关于政治两极化及其在气候变化方面应用的文献,并提出了进一步的研究方向和干预设计思路。我们聚焦于美国的两极化情况,在有相关文献时也会考察其他国家。两极化文献强调政治两极化的两种机制:(1)与政治意识形态相关的个体层面心理过程,以及(2)与党派认同相关的群体层面心理过程。针对群体层面过程的干预可能比针对个体层面过程的干预更有效。因此,我们强调利用超级身份认同、纠正错误认知规范以及让可信领导人就气候变化进行沟通的干预措施的前景。像这样基于科学研究的行为干预措施是我们实现应对气候变化所需行为转变以及在其他政策问题上取得进展的最有前景的工具之一。