Suppr超能文献

政治两极分化的社会心理学视角:对气候变化的见解与启示

Social Psychological Perspectives on Political Polarization: Insights and Implications for Climate Change.

作者信息

Cole Jennifer C, Gillis Ash J, van der Linden Sander, Cohen Mark A, Vandenbergh Michael P

机构信息

Climate Change Research Network, Vanderbilt University.

Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University.

出版信息

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2025 Jan;20(1):115-141. doi: 10.1177/17456916231186409. Epub 2023 Sep 18.

Abstract

Political polarization is a barrier to enacting policy solutions to global issues. Social psychology has a rich history of studying polarization, and there is an important opportunity to define and refine its contributions to the present political realities. We do so in the context of one of the most pressing modern issues: climate change. We synthesize the literature on political polarization and its applications to climate change, and we propose lines of further research and intervention design. We focus on polarization in the United States, examining other countries when literature was available. The polarization literature emphasizes two types of mechanisms of political polarization: (1) individual-level psychological processes related to political ideology and (2) group-level psychological processes related to partisan identification. Interventions that address group-level processes can be more effective than those that address individual-level processes. Accordingly, we emphasize the promise of interventions leveraging superordinate identities, correcting misperceived norms, and having trusted leaders communicate about climate change. Behavioral interventions like these that are grounded in scientific research are one of our most promising tools to achieve the behavioral wedge that we need to address climate change and to make progress on other policy issues.

摘要

政治两极化是制定全球问题政策解决方案的障碍。社会心理学在研究两极化方面有着丰富的历史,当下有一个重要机会来界定并完善其对当前政治现实的贡献。我们在最紧迫的现代问题之一——气候变化的背景下开展此项工作。我们综合了关于政治两极化及其在气候变化方面应用的文献,并提出了进一步的研究方向和干预设计思路。我们聚焦于美国的两极化情况,在有相关文献时也会考察其他国家。两极化文献强调政治两极化的两种机制:(1)与政治意识形态相关的个体层面心理过程,以及(2)与党派认同相关的群体层面心理过程。针对群体层面过程的干预可能比针对个体层面过程的干预更有效。因此,我们强调利用超级身份认同、纠正错误认知规范以及让可信领导人就气候变化进行沟通的干预措施的前景。像这样基于科学研究的行为干预措施是我们实现应对气候变化所需行为转变以及在其他政策问题上取得进展的最有前景的工具之一。

相似文献

2
Social Climate Science: A New Vista for Psychological Science.社会气候科学:心理学科学的新视角。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Sep;11(5):632-650. doi: 10.1177/1745691616639726.
7
Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices.政治意识形态影响能源效率态度和选择。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 4;110(23):9314-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218453110. Epub 2013 Apr 29.

本文引用的文献

8
Social norms explain prioritization of climate policy.社会规范解释了气候政策的优先次序。
Clim Change. 2022;173(1-2):10. doi: 10.1007/s10584-022-03396-x. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验