Cole Jennifer C, Ehret Phillip J, Sherman David K, Van Boven Leaf
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, USA.
Climate Change Research Network, Vanderbilt University, PMB 351805, 2301, Vanderbilt Place 37235-1805, Nashville, TN USA.
Clim Change. 2022;173(1-2):10. doi: 10.1007/s10584-022-03396-x. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
Most people in the United States recognize the reality of climate change and are concerned about its consequences, yet climate change is a low priority relative to other policy issues. Recognizing that belief in climate change does not necessarily translate to prioritizing climate policy, we examine psychological factors that may boost or inhibit prioritization. We hypothesized that perceived social norms from people's own political party influence their climate policy prioritization beyond their personal belief in climate change. In Study 1, a large, diverse sample of Democratic and Republican participants ( = 887) reported their prioritization of climate policy relative to other issues. Participants' perceptions of their political ingroup's social norms about climate policy prioritization were the strongest predictor of personal climate policy prioritization-stronger even than participants' belief in climate change, political orientation, environmental identity, and environmental values. Perceptions of political outgroup norms did not predict prioritization. In Study 2 ( = 217), we experimentally manipulated Democratic and Republican descriptive norms of climate policy prioritization. Participants' prioritization of climate policy was highest when both the political ingroup and the outgroup prioritized climate policy. Ingroup norms had a strong influence on personal policy prioritization whereas outgroup norms did not. These findings demonstrate that, beyond personal beliefs and other individual differences, ingroup social norms shape the public's prioritization of climate change as a policy issue.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10584-022-03396-x.
美国大多数人认识到气候变化的现实并担心其后果,但相对于其他政策问题,气候变化的优先级较低。认识到对气候变化的信念不一定转化为对气候政策的优先重视,我们研究了可能促进或抑制优先重视的心理因素。我们假设,来自人们自己政党的感知社会规范会影响他们对气候政策的优先重视程度,这种影响超出了他们个人对气候变化的信念。在研究1中,对大量不同的民主党和共和党参与者(n = 887)进行调查,了解他们相对于其他问题对气候政策的优先重视程度。参与者对其政治内群体关于气候政策优先重视的社会规范的感知,是个人气候政策优先重视程度的最强预测因素——甚至比参与者对气候变化的信念、政治倾向、环境认同和环境价值观还要强。对政治外群体规范的感知并不能预测优先重视程度。在研究2(n = 217)中,我们通过实验操纵了民主党和共和党对气候政策优先重视的描述性规范。当政治内群体和外群体都将气候政策列为优先事项时,参与者对气候政策的优先重视程度最高。内群体规范对个人政策优先重视程度有很大影响,而外群体规范则没有。这些发现表明,除了个人信念和其他个体差异之外,内群体社会规范塑造了公众将气候变化作为一个政策问题的优先重视程度。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10584-022-03396-x获取的补充材料。