Norwegian Center for Reading Education and Research, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
Dyslexia. 2023 Nov;29(4):408-425. doi: 10.1002/dys.1752. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
Technological reading and writing tools can help students with dyslexia improve their writing, but students do not use reading and writing functions as much as expected. However, research addressing relevant technological functions is scarce. This study explored the needs of writers with dyslexia and how technological writing tools developed for three Nordic languages meet these needs. Snowball sampling was used to identify different technological features, spellchecker, word prediction, auto-correction, text-to-speech and speech-to-text functions available in nine widely used programmes were investigated. The results indicated that students with moderate spelling difficulties can now achieve accurate spellings using the most sophisticated spelling aids; however, most of these features require time and attention, and this can disturb writing fluency and hamper text production. The implication of this study is that the underlying conflict between spelling accuracy and writing fluency must be actively managed, which necessitates competence in the use of technological tools for both students and teachers in school. Also, further development of tools for scaffolding transcription must consider the dilemma of achieving both writing fluency and spelling accuracy. Further, the accuracy of the aid for students with severe spelling difficulties remains unclear and must be investigated.
技术阅读和书写工具可以帮助诵读困难的学生提高写作能力,但学生并没有像预期的那样多使用阅读和书写功能。然而,针对相关技术功能的研究却很少。本研究探讨了诵读困难者的写作需求,以及为三种北欧语言开发的技术写作工具如何满足这些需求。采用滚雪球抽样法来确定不同的技术功能,研究了九种广泛使用的程序中可用的拼写检查器、单词预测、自动纠错、文本转语音和语音转文本功能。结果表明,现在具有中度拼写困难的学生可以使用最先进的拼写辅助工具来实现准确的拼写;然而,这些功能大多需要时间和注意力,这会干扰写作流畅性并阻碍文本生成。本研究的意义在于,拼写准确性和写作流畅性之间的潜在冲突必须得到积极管理,这需要学生和教师在学校都具备使用技术工具的能力。此外,为转录提供支持的工具的进一步开发必须考虑到在实现写作流畅性和拼写准确性这两者之间的困境。此外,对于拼写困难严重的学生,辅助工具的准确性仍不清楚,需要进一步调查。