Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dyslexia. 2024 Nov;30(4):e1786. doi: 10.1002/dys.1786.
Presentation features such as spelling, punctuation and handwriting can influence the evaluation of general text quality. High school students with dyslexia might therefore be at a disadvantage, as at least their spelling performance is typically poor(er). Furthermore, these students might show less sophisticated linguistic features of texts, such as word length and sentence complexity, that might also be related to text quality. We compared narratives written by Dutch high school students (mean age 13.7 years) with (n = 28) and without (n = 29) dyslexia. Students with dyslexia's texts contained more spelling errors and poorer handwriting quality, but not more punctuation errors. Teacher-rated general text quality was lower for the texts of students with dyslexia in uncorrected versions. When spelling and punctuation errors were corrected, no teacher-rated text quality differences emerged. No differences in linguistic text features were found. Furthermore, spelling, punctuation and, to a lesser extent, number of words per sentence clause were related to ratings of text quality across participants. These results confirm the influence of presentation features on text quality rating. They encourage teachers to be aware of this effect and emphasize the importance of spelling and writing support and interventions for students with dyslexia throughout education.
呈现特征,如拼写、标点和书写,会影响对整体文本质量的评估。因此,患有诵读困难的高中生可能处于劣势,因为他们的拼写表现通常较差。此外,这些学生的文本可能表现出较少的语言特征,如单词长度和句子复杂度,这些特征也可能与文本质量有关。我们比较了荷兰高中生(平均年龄 13.7 岁)的记叙文,其中有(n=28)和没有(n=29)诵读困难的学生。有诵读困难的学生的文本包含更多的拼写错误和较差的书写质量,但标点错误并不多。在未经修正的版本中,诵读困难学生的文本的教师总体质量评分较低。当纠正拼写和标点错误时,教师对文本质量的评价就没有差异了。也没有发现语言文本特征的差异。此外,在所有参与者中,拼写、标点以及句子中每个词的数量都与文本质量的评价有关。这些结果证实了呈现特征对文本质量评价的影响。它们鼓励教师意识到这种影响,并强调在整个教育过程中为诵读困难学生提供拼写和写作支持以及干预的重要性。