Goldenberg K
J Gen Intern Med. 1986 Sep-Oct;1(5):282-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02596204.
Health maintenance and disease prevention guidelines of primary care internal medicine residency (PCIM) programs were investigated and compared with recommendations of major national organizations. Preventive screening data were requested from 134 PCIM programs; 120 (90%) responded. Methods included seminars/lectures by 73 (61%), health maintenance flow sheets by 58 (48%), and a variety of other formats by 25 (21%) programs. A comparison of recommended flow sheet items (n = 33) from five major studies and 48 PCIM programs showed concordances (+/- SE) of 62% (+/- 5) with high-priority items (n = 15) and 33% (+/- 4) with low-priority items (n = 18). When an item's frequency or age range was examined, however, concordances were much lower. From our analysis, fewer than half the programs routinely used prompting systems, such as flow sheets, in their ambulatory clinics, and there was little uniformity in the frequencies and age ranges for those items employed. The data suggest that major study recommendations were underused and underemphasized.
对基层医疗内科住院医师培训(PCIM)项目的健康维护和疾病预防指南进行了调查,并与主要国家组织的建议进行了比较。向134个PCIM项目索要预防性筛查数据;120个项目(90%)做出了回应。方法包括73个项目(61%)采用研讨会/讲座,58个项目(48%)采用健康维护流程图,25个项目(21%)采用各种其他形式。对五项主要研究和48个PCIM项目推荐的流程图项目(n = 33)进行比较,结果显示,高优先级项目(n = 15)的一致性为62%(±5),低优先级项目(n = 18)的一致性为33%(±4)。然而,当检查某个项目的频率或年龄范围时,一致性要低得多。根据我们的分析,不到一半的项目在其门诊诊所常规使用提示系统,如流程图,而且所采用项目的频率和年龄范围几乎没有一致性。数据表明,主要研究的建议未得到充分利用和重视。