Snow D A
J Gen Intern Med. 1986 Sep-Oct;1(5):295-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02596206.
To determine the clinical significance of discrepancies in roentgenographic film interpretation, housestaff's interpretations of 248 outpatient x-rays obtained in a walk-in/emergency room area were compared with the interpretations by radiologists. There was complete agreement for 134/248 (54%) films. Discrepancies for 114 films were classified as potentially significant (n = 28, 25%) or insignificant (n = 86, 75%). Most significant discrepancies (26 of 28) were related to the indication for the film. Most insignificant discrepancies (75 of 86) were unrelated to the film's indication. No discrepancies resulted in serious adverse patient outcomes, although one resulted in delayed treatment of a fractured humerus, one resulted in delay of antibiotic treatment, and three resulted in antibiotic use that may have been unnecessary. In two cases, the initial treatment plan was changed based on the final radiologist's report. These results indicate that while discrepancies in film interpretation are frequent, their clinical impact may be small.
为了确定X线片解读差异的临床意义,将住院医师对在门诊/急诊区域获得的248例门诊患者X线片的解读与放射科医生的解读进行了比较。248张片子中有134张(54%)解读完全一致。114张片子的差异被分类为潜在显著差异(n = 28,25%)或不显著差异(n = 86,75%)。大多数显著差异(28例中的26例)与拍片指征有关。大多数不显著差异(86例中的75例)与拍片指征无关。尽管有1例导致肱骨骨折治疗延迟,1例导致抗生素治疗延迟,3例导致可能不必要的抗生素使用,但没有差异导致严重的不良患者结局。在2例中,根据放射科医生的最终报告改变了初始治疗方案。这些结果表明,虽然片子解读差异很常见,但其临床影响可能很小。