Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Paris School of Economics, Paris, France.
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Jul;25(5):829-844. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01627-1. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness studies of interventions to increase cervical cancer screening uptake rates in underserved women in Europe.
A search of Embase, Medline, Global Health, PsychINFO, and NHS Economic Evaluation Database was conducted for studies published between January 2000 and September 2022. Studies were eligible if they analysed the cost-effectiveness of any interventions to improve participation in cervical cancer screening among underserved women of any age eligible to participate in cervical cancer screening in European countries, in any language. Study characteristics and cost-effectiveness results were summarised. Study quality was assessed using the Drummond Checklist, and methodological choices were further compared.
The searches yielded 962 unique studies, with 17 of these (from twelve European countries) meeting the eligibility criteria for data extraction. All studies focused on underscreened women as an overarching group, with no identified studies focusing on specific subgroups of underserved women. Generally, self-HPV testing and reminder interventions were shown to be cost-effective to increase the uptake rates. There was also research showing that addressing access issues and adopting different screening modalities could be economically attractive in some settings, but the current evidence is insufficient due to the limited number of studies.
This systematic review has revealed a gap in the literature on the cost-effectiveness of interventions to improve uptake rates of cervical cancer screening through tailored provision for specific groups of underserved women.
本研究旨在对增加欧洲服务不足妇女宫颈癌筛查参与率的干预措施的成本效益研究进行系统评价。
对 Embase、Medline、Global Health、PsychINFO 和 NHS 经济评估数据库进行了检索,以查找 2000 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月期间发表的研究。如果研究分析了任何旨在提高参与宫颈癌筛查的服务不足的妇女的成本效益,这些研究即为合格研究,无论其年龄大小,也无论其是否有资格在欧洲国家参加宫颈癌筛查,语言不限。总结了研究特征和成本效益结果。使用 Drummond 清单评估研究质量,并进一步比较方法学选择。
检索共产生了 962 项独特的研究,其中 17 项(来自 12 个欧洲国家)符合提取数据的纳入标准。所有研究都将筛查不足的妇女作为一个总体群体,没有研究针对服务不足妇女的特定亚组。一般来说,自我 HPV 检测和提醒干预被证明可以提高参与率,具有成本效益。还有研究表明,在某些情况下,解决获取问题和采用不同的筛查方式可能具有经济吸引力,但由于研究数量有限,目前的证据还不够充分。
本系统评价揭示了文献中存在的一个空白,即缺乏针对特定服务不足妇女群体的有针对性的干预措施来提高宫颈癌筛查参与率的成本效益研究。