Bashir Saima, Whittaker William, Meads Catherine
Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Faculty of Health, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Mar 21;14(3):260. doi: 10.3390/bs14030260.
: Equitable access to healthcare is a priority of many healthcare systems, aiming to ensure access is driven by need and not minority groups such as those defined by sexual orientation. However, there are healthcare areas where inequity in access across sexual orientation groups is found that are not justified based on need. Mandated LGBTQ+-specific training of the healthcare workforce may help address some barriers of access for these groups. The study aims to understand the potential economic implications for mandated LGBTQ+-specific healthcare training on the healthcare system in England, UK to inform commissioning of training provision. : Cervical cancer screening was used as an exemplar case where there appears to be inequity in access for different sexual orientation groups. A decision model was developed and analysed that considered the impacts of greater uptake of screening for lesbian and bisexual women due to LGBTQ+ training. Costs took the perspective of the healthcare system and outcomes modelled were cancer cases averted in a timeframe of 5 years. : Based on cervical cancer screening alone, where training costs are fully attributed to this service, training would likely result in fewer cancer cases detected in the lesbian and bisexual populations, though this comes at a modest increase in healthcare sector costs, with this increase largely reflecting a greater volume of screens. Training costs do not appear to be a major component of the cost implications. : In resource-constrained systems with increasing pressures for efficiency savings, the opportunity cost of delivering training is a realistic component of the commissioning decision. The findings in this paper provide a signal that mandated LGBTQ+ training in healthcare could lead to potentially greater outcomes and in breaking down barriers of access and could also enable the healthcare system to provide more equitable access to healthcare.
公平获得医疗保健是许多医疗系统的首要任务,旨在确保医疗服务的获取是基于需求驱动,而非由性取向等少数群体因素决定。然而,在医疗保健领域中,存在着性取向群体之间获得医疗服务不平等的情况,且这种不平等并非基于需求的合理差异。强制要求医疗保健人员接受针对性取向群体的培训,可能有助于消除这些群体在获得医疗服务方面的一些障碍。本研究旨在了解在英国英格兰地区,强制要求进行针对性取向群体的医疗培训对医疗系统可能产生的经济影响,为培训服务的委托提供参考依据。
宫颈癌筛查被用作一个典型案例,不同性取向群体在获得该筛查服务方面似乎存在不平等现象。我们开发并分析了一个决策模型,该模型考虑了因针对性取向群体的培训而导致女同性恋和双性恋女性接受筛查比例提高所产生的影响。成本从医疗系统的角度进行考量,所模拟的结果是在5年时间内避免的癌症病例数。
仅基于宫颈癌筛查而言,若培训成本完全归因于该项服务,培训可能会使女同性恋和双性恋人群中检测出的癌症病例减少,不过这会导致医疗部门成本略有增加,这种增加主要反映在筛查数量的增多上。培训成本似乎并非成本影响的主要构成部分。
在资源有限且提高效率节约成本压力不断增大的医疗系统中,提供培训的机会成本是委托决策中一个现实的考量因素。本文的研究结果表明,在医疗保健领域强制进行针对性取向群体的培训可能会带来更大的潜在成果,打破获取医疗服务的障碍,还能使医疗系统提供更公平的医疗服务。