• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Stakeholder perspectives on the preferred service ecosystem for senior citizens living at home: a qualitative interview study.利益相关者对居家老年人首选服务生态系统的观点:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 19;23(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04303-4.
2
How do the existing homecare services correspond with the preferred service ecosystem for senior citizens living at home? A qualitative interview study with multiple stakeholders.现有的居家护理服务如何与居家老年人偏爱的服务生态系统相匹配?一项针对多个利益相关者的定性访谈研究。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Mar 21;4:1294320. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1294320. eCollection 2024.
3
Citizens' perspectives on healthy weight approaches in low SEP neighborhoods: a qualitative study from a systems perspective.低社会经济地位社区居民对健康体重方法的看法:一项基于系统视角的定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):2137. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19595-3.
4
Identifying, categorising, and mapping actors involved in resilience in healthcare: a qualitative stakeholder analysis.确定、分类并绘制医疗卫生系统韧性建设中相关行为体图谱:定性利益攸关方分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 22;24(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10654-4.
5
Stakeholder involvement in dementia research: A qualitative approach with healthy senior citizens and providers of dementia care in Germany.利益相关者参与痴呆症研究:德国健康老年人和痴呆症护理提供者的定性方法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 May;30(3):908-917. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13238. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
6
[Geriatric health promotion and prevention for independently living senior citizens: programmes and target groups].[针对独立生活老年人的老年健康促进与预防:项目与目标群体]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2007 Aug;40(4):226-40. doi: 10.1007/s00391-007-0469-8.
7
"I just keep thinking that I don't want to rely on people." a qualitative study of how people living with dementia achieve and maintain independence at home: stakeholder perspectives.“我只是一直想着,我不想依赖别人。”一项关于痴呆症患者如何在家中实现和保持独立性的定性研究:利益相关者视角。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jan 3;20(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1406-6.
8
Characteristics of the ideal healthcare services to meet adolescents' mental health needs: A qualitative study of adolescents' perspectives.满足青少年心理健康需求的理想医疗保健服务的特征:一项基于青少年观点的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):2924-2936. doi: 10.1111/hex.13600. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
9
Characteristics of general practice care: what do senior citizens value? A qualitative study.全科医疗的特点:老年人看重什么?一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2010 Nov 2;10:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-10-80.
10
German senior citizens' capabilities for physical activity: a qualitative study.德国老年人的身体活动能力:一项定性研究。
Health Promot Int. 2019 Dec 1;34(6):1117-1129. doi: 10.1093/heapro/day077.

引用本文的文献

1
How Has 'What Matters to You' Been Used for Patient Care? A Scoping Review.“对你重要的事”如何用于患者护理?一项范围综述。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70217. doi: 10.1111/hex.70217.
2
Enhancing safe medication use in home care: insights from informal caregivers.加强居家护理中的安全用药:来自非正式护理人员的见解。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Nov 5;11:1494771. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1494771. eCollection 2024.
3
How do the existing homecare services correspond with the preferred service ecosystem for senior citizens living at home? A qualitative interview study with multiple stakeholders.现有的居家护理服务如何与居家老年人偏爱的服务生态系统相匹配?一项针对多个利益相关者的定性访谈研究。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Mar 21;4:1294320. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1294320. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Caring for older men and women: whose caregivers are more distressed? A population-based retrospective cohort study.照顾老年男性和女性:谁的照顾者更苦恼?一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Nov 22;22(1):890. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03583-6.
2
Actions taken to safeguard the intended health care chain of older people with multiple diagnoses - a critical incident study.为保障患有多种疾病的老年人预期医疗保健链所采取的行动——一项重大事件研究
BMC Nurs. 2022 Sep 21;21(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01039-1.
3
What matters to people aged 80 and over regarding ambulatory care? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.对于80岁及以上的老年人来说,门诊护理方面什么是重要的?一项定性研究的系统评价和元综合分析。
Eur J Ageing. 2021 Aug 21;19(3):325-339. doi: 10.1007/s10433-021-00633-7. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
The concept of disability and its causal mechanisms in older people over time from a theoretical perspective: a literature review.从理论角度看老年人残疾概念及其随时间变化的因果机制:一项文献综述
Eur J Ageing. 2022 Jan 29;19(3):397-411. doi: 10.1007/s10433-021-00668-w. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Which features of ambulatory healthcare are preferred by people aged 80 and over? Findings from a systematic review of qualitative studies and appraisal of confidence using GRADE-CERQual.80 岁及以上人群更喜欢哪些门诊医疗服务的特点?一项系统评价定性研究的结果,并使用 GRADE-CERQual 评估信心。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 16;22(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03006-6.
6
Changing the long-term care spectrum.改变长期护理范围。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 8;22(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02909-8.
7
Family caregivers' involvement in caring for frail older family members using welfare technology: a qualitative study of home care in transition.家庭照顾者使用福利技术照顾体弱老年家庭成员的参与情况:转型期家庭护理的定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Mar 18;22(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02890-2.
8
Destinations fostering older adults' walking for transport: a cross-sectional study from Germany.目的地促进老年人的交通步行:来自德国的一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Mar 17;22(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02896-w.
9
Keeping calm on a busy day-an interpersonal skill home care patients desire in health workers: hermeneutical phenomenological method.在忙碌的一天保持冷静——家庭护理患者期望医护人员具备的一项人际技能:诠释现象学方法
BMC Nurs. 2022 Feb 25;21(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00825-1.
10
A qualitative study on promoting reablement among older people living at home in Norway: opportunities and constraints.一项关于促进挪威居家老年人重新融入社会的定性研究:机会与限制。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 4;22(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07543-z.

利益相关者对居家老年人首选服务生态系统的观点:一项定性访谈研究。

Stakeholder perspectives on the preferred service ecosystem for senior citizens living at home: a qualitative interview study.

机构信息

Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, University of Stavanger, Post Box 8600, Forus, Stavanger, 4036, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 19;23(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04303-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-023-04303-4
PMID:37726648
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10508029/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most senior citizens want to live independently at home as long as possible. The World Health Organization recommends an age-friendly community approach by transforming the service ecosystem for senior citizens and basing it on the question "What matters to you?". However, there is limited research-based knowledge to determine the characteristics of the preferred service ecosystem from the perspectives of multiple stakeholders. Therefore, the aim of the study was to gain a deeper understanding of multiple stakeholder perspectives on the preferred service ecosystem for senior citizens living at home.

METHODS

Four stakeholder groups (n = 57) from a Norwegian municipality participated in an interview study in 2019 and 2020: senior citizens, carers, healthcare professionals, and managers. Data were analysed according to qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, there was considerable correspondence between the four stakeholder groups' perspectives on the preferred service ecosystem for senior citizens. Six themes were developed: (1) "self-reliance - living independently at home as long as possible"; (2) "remaining active and social within the community"; (3) "support for living at home as long as possible"; (4) "accessible information and services"; (5) "continuity of services"; and (6) "compassionate and competent healthcare professionals".

CONCLUSIONS

In order to adapt and meet changing needs, the preferred service ecosystem should support senior citizens' autonomy through interpersonal relationships and involvement. Healthcare managers and decision makers should consider a broader range of practical and social support services. Municipalities should plan for and develop age-friendly infrastructures, while healthcare professionals should rely on their compassion and competence to meet senior citizens' needs.

摘要

背景

大多数老年人都希望尽可能长时间地独立在家生活。世界卫生组织建议采取一种对老年人友好的社区方法,通过转变老年人的服务生态系统,并基于“什么对您重要?”这一问题来实现这一目标。然而,从多个利益相关者的角度来确定理想的服务生态系统的特征,这方面基于研究的知识有限。因此,本研究的目的是更深入地了解多个利益相关者对居住在家中的老年人的理想服务生态系统的看法。

方法

2019 年至 2020 年,来自挪威一个市的四个利益相关者群体(n=57)参与了访谈研究:老年人、护理人员、医疗保健专业人员和管理人员。数据按照定性内容分析进行分析。

结果

总体而言,四个利益相关者群体对老年人理想服务生态系统的看法有相当大的一致性。确定了六个主题:(1)“自力更生-尽可能长时间独立在家生活”;(2)“在社区中保持活跃和社交”;(3)“支持尽可能长时间地在家生活”;(4)“可访问的信息和服务”;(5)“服务的连续性”;和(6)“富有同情心和能力的医疗保健专业人员”。

结论

为了适应和满足不断变化的需求,理想的服务生态系统应通过人际关系和参与来支持老年人的自主性。医疗保健管理人员和决策者应考虑更广泛的实际和社会支持服务。市政当局应规划和发展对老年人友好的基础设施,而医疗保健专业人员应依靠他们的同情心和能力来满足老年人的需求。