Kattouw Christophe Eward, Aase Karina, Viksveen Petter
SHARE-Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Front Health Serv. 2024 Mar 21;4:1294320. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1294320. eCollection 2024.
Often, homecare services are task-focused rather than person-based and fragmented instead of integrated. Consequently, several stakeholders have requested a transformation of the service ecosystem for senior citizens living at home. This transformation may be facilitated by an idealized design approach. However, few studies have applied such an approach. Moreover, previous research did not assess the ways in which the existing homecare services correspond with the preferred service ecosystem for senior citizens living at home. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to gain an understanding of how the existing homecare services correspond with the preferred service ecosystem for senior citizens living at home, according to different stakeholders.
Four stakeholder groups ( = 57) from a Norwegian municipality participated in an interview study (2019-2020): senior citizens, carers, healthcare professionals and managers. A directed qualitative content analysis was applied, guided by a four-category framework for the preferred service ecosystem.
All stakeholder groups highlighted several limitations that hindered continuity of the services. There was also agreement on deficiencies in professionals' competence, yet professionals themselves did not focus on this as a significant aspect. Managers emphasised the importance of professionals' reablement competence, which was also considered to be deficient in the current homecare services. Contrary to the other stakeholder groups, most senior citizens seemed satisfied with the practical and social support they received. Together with carers, they also explained why they thought some professionals lack compassion. Their dependency on professionals may limit them in sharing honestly their opinions and preferences during care provision. Involvement of senior citizens in improvement of the current services was limited. Insufficient time and resources, as well as a complex organisation impacted the existing homecare services, and therefore served as barriers to the preferred service ecosystem.
In this study there were different degrees of correspondence between the existing homecare services and the preferred service ecosystem according to four stakeholder groups. To develop the preferred service ecosystem, aspects such as predictability, adaptivity, and relationships are key, as well as continuous involvement of senior citizens and other stakeholders. The four-category framework applied in this study served as a tool to assess the existing homecare services.
通常,居家护理服务以任务为导向而非以人为本,且零散而非整合。因此,一些利益相关者要求对居家老年人的服务生态系统进行变革。理想化的设计方法可能有助于这种变革。然而,很少有研究采用这种方法。此外,以往的研究并未评估现有居家护理服务与居家老年人首选服务生态系统的契合方式。因此,本研究的目的是了解根据不同利益相关者的看法,现有居家护理服务与居家老年人首选服务生态系统的契合情况。
来自挪威一个自治市的四个利益相关者群体(n = 57)参与了一项访谈研究(2019 - 2020年):老年人、护理人员、医疗保健专业人员和管理人员。采用定向定性内容分析法,以首选服务生态系统的四类框架为指导。
所有利益相关者群体都强调了几个阻碍服务连续性的限制因素。对于专业人员能力的不足也存在共识,但专业人员自身并未将此视为一个重要方面。管理人员强调了专业人员康复能力的重要性,而目前的居家护理服务在这方面也被认为存在不足。与其他利益相关者群体不同,大多数老年人似乎对他们所获得的实际和社会支持感到满意。他们还与护理人员一起解释了为什么他们认为一些专业人员缺乏同情心。他们对专业人员的依赖可能会限制他们在护理过程中诚实地分享自己的意见和偏好。老年人对当前服务改进的参与有限。时间和资源不足以及组织复杂影响了现有的居家护理服务,因此成为首选服务生态系统的障碍。
在本研究中,根据四个利益相关者群体的看法,现有居家护理服务与首选服务生态系统之间存在不同程度的契合。为了发展首选服务生态系统,可预测性、适应性和关系等方面是关键,同时老年人和其他利益相关者的持续参与也很重要。本研究中应用的四类框架作为评估现有居家护理服务的工具。