• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非气动主动压缩装置对乳腺癌相关上肢淋巴水肿老年患者的疗效:一项随机交叉试验的亚组分析。

Effectiveness of a Nonpneumatic Active Compression Device in Older Adults with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Subanalysis of a Randomized Crossover Trial.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

Department of Plastic Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Lymphat Res Biol. 2023 Dec;21(6):581-584. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2022.0085. Epub 2023 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1089/lrb.2022.0085
PMID:37729078
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10753982/
Abstract

A recently completed clinical trial compared a novel nonpneumatic compression device (NPCD) with a traditional advanced pneumatic compression device (APCD) for the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL); the study revealed that the NPCD produced superior clinical and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes. In this subanalysis, we sought to examine these results within the subset of trial subjects aged ≥65 years. A randomized crossover head-to-head trial was conducted to compare the NPCD with a commercially available APCD. Patients were randomly assigned to one or the other device for 28 days of use, followed by a 4-week washout period before a comparable 28-day utilization of the alternate device. Limb edema, adherence to daily device use, and QOL measures were collected at day 0 and 28 of each period. A total of 14 subjects were aged ≥65. During NPCD use, subjects experienced a mean decrease in limb edema of 100.3% ( = 0.0082) as well as improvements in mean overall and subscale scores of the Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (LYMQOL). By comparison, during APCD use limb edema decreased by a mean of 2.9% ( = 0.8899) with no significant changes in any LYMQOL scores. Mean adherence was significantly higher during NPCD use (96.6%) than during APCD use (58.3%,  < 0.0001). The novel NPCD produced superior clinical and QOL outcomes in older subjects with BCRL. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04908254.

摘要

一项最近完成的临床试验比较了一种新型非气动压缩设备(NPCD)与传统的高级气动压缩设备(APCD)治疗乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)的效果;研究结果表明,NPCD 产生了更好的临床和生活质量(QOL)结果。在这项亚分析中,我们试图在年龄≥65 岁的试验受试者亚组中检查这些结果。 一项随机交叉头对头试验比较了 NPCD 与市售的 APCD。患者被随机分配到一种或另一种设备中使用 28 天,然后在使用替代设备的 4 周洗脱期后进行为期 28 天的可比较使用。在每个周期的第 0 天和第 28 天收集肢体水肿、日常设备使用依从性和 QOL 测量值。 共有 14 名受试者年龄≥65 岁。在 NPCD 使用期间,受试者的肢体水肿平均减少 100.3%(=0.0082),并且 Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire(LYMQOL)的总评分和子量表评分均有改善。相比之下,在 APCD 使用期间,肢体水肿平均减少 2.9%(=0.8899),LYMQOL 评分无显著变化。NPCD 使用时的平均依从性明显高于 APCD 使用时(96.6%比 58.3%, < 0.0001)。 新型 NPCD 为年龄较大的 BCRL 患者带来了更好的临床和 QOL 结果。ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT04908254。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fe4/10753982/a4fc062a9ef0/lrb.2022.0085_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fe4/10753982/a4fc062a9ef0/lrb.2022.0085_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fe4/10753982/a4fc062a9ef0/lrb.2022.0085_figure1.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a Nonpneumatic Active Compression Device in Older Adults with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Subanalysis of a Randomized Crossover Trial.非气动主动压缩装置对乳腺癌相关上肢淋巴水肿老年患者的疗效:一项随机交叉试验的亚组分析。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2023 Dec;21(6):581-584. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2022.0085. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
2
Safety and effectiveness of a novel nonpneumatic active compression device for treating breast cancer-related lymphedema: A multicenter randomized, crossover trial (NILE).一种新型非气动主动压缩装置治疗乳腺癌相关性淋巴水肿的安全性和有效性:一项多中心随机交叉试验(NILE)。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022 Nov;10(6):1359-1366.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.06.016. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
3
Results from a comparative study to evaluate the treatment effectiveness of a nonpneumatic compression device vs an advanced pneumatic compression device for lower extremity lymphedema swelling (TEAYS study).一项比较研究的结果,该研究旨在评估非充气式压缩装置与先进充气式压缩装置对下肢淋巴水肿肿胀的治疗效果(TEAYS研究)。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2025 Jan;13(1):101965. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101965. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
4
A non-randomized, open-label study of the safety and effectiveness of a novel non-pneumatic compression device (NPCD) for lower limb lymphedema.一种新型非气动压迫装置(NPCD)治疗下肢淋巴水肿的安全性和有效性的非随机、开放性研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 17;12(1):14005. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17225-9.
5
A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of complete decongestive therapy in the treatment of unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema with and without metabolic syndrome.比较分析完整消肿疗法治疗伴或不伴代谢综合征的单侧乳腺癌相关性淋巴水肿的疗效。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jun 29;32(7):473. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08676-z.
6
A randomized controlled trial comparing two types of pneumatic compression for breast cancer-related lymphedema treatment in the home.一项比较两种气动压迫方式治疗乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的家庭治疗的随机对照试验。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Dec;20(12):3279-86. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1455-2. Epub 2012 May 2.
7
Assessment of quality of life changes in patients with lower extremity lymphedema using an advanced pneumatic compression device at home.使用先进的气动压缩装置在家中评估下肢淋巴水肿患者的生活质量变化。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 May;9(3):745-752. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.10.013. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
8
Prospective Surveillance with Compression for Subclinical Lymphedema: Symptoms, Skin, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes.无症状性淋巴水肿的预防性加压治疗监测:症状、皮肤和生活质量结局。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2023 Jun;21(3):304-313. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2022.0020. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
9
Longitudinal assessment of health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes with at home advanced pneumatic compression treatment of lower extremity lymphedema.下肢淋巴水肿在家中采用先进气动压缩治疗的健康相关生活质量和临床结局的纵向评估。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jul;12(4):101892. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101892. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
10
Advanced pneumatic compression for treatment of lymphedema of the head and neck: a randomized wait-list controlled trial.高级气动压迫治疗头颈部淋巴水肿:一项随机等待名单对照试验。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Feb;29(2):795-803. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05540-8. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and effectiveness of a novel nonpneumatic active compression device for treating breast cancer-related lymphedema: A multicenter randomized, crossover trial (NILE).一种新型非气动主动压缩装置治疗乳腺癌相关性淋巴水肿的安全性和有效性:一项多中心随机交叉试验(NILE)。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022 Nov;10(6):1359-1366.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.06.016. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
2
Older Adults' Physical Activity and Healthcare Costs, 2003-2014.老年人的体力活动与医疗保健费用,2003-2014 年。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 May;58(5):e141-e148. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.12.009. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
3
Superior Clinical, Quality of Life, Functional, and Health Economic Outcomes with Pneumatic Compression Therapy for Lymphedema.
气压治疗淋巴水肿的卓越临床、生活质量、功能及健康经济结果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Feb;63:298-306. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.08.091. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
4
Breast cancer-related lymphedema and quality of life: A qualitative analysis over years of survivorship.乳腺癌相关性淋巴水肿与生活质量:生存多年的定性分析。
Chronic Illn. 2021 Sep;17(3):257-268. doi: 10.1177/1742395319872796. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
5
Lymphedema after Breast Cancer Treatment.乳腺癌治疗后的淋巴水肿。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1937-1944. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1803290.
6
Effects of physical exercise on breast cancer-related secondary lymphedema: a systematic review.运动对乳腺癌相关性继发性淋巴水肿的影响:系统评价。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jul;170(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4725-y. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
7
Complexities of Adherence and Post-Cancer Lymphedema Management.癌症后淋巴水肿管理中的依从性复杂性
J Pers Med. 2015 Nov 16;5(4):370-88. doi: 10.3390/jpm5040370.
8
The Cutaneous, Net Clinical, and Health Economic Benefits of Advanced Pneumatic Compression Devices in Patients With Lymphedema.先进气动加压装置在淋巴水肿患者中的皮肤、临床净获益和健康经济学效益。
JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Nov;151(11):1187-93. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.1895.
9
Pneumatic Compression Improves Quality of Life in Patients with Lower-Extremity Lymphedema.气压治疗可改善下肢淋巴水肿患者的生活质量。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Jan;30:40-4. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
10
Lymphedema prevalence and treatment benefits in cancer: impact of a therapeutic intervention on health outcomes and costs.癌症患者淋巴水肿的患病率及治疗益处:一种治疗性干预对健康结局和成本的影响
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e114597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114597. eCollection 2014.