Department of Ultrasound, Laboratory of Novel Optoacoustic (Ultrasonic) Imaging, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2023 Dec;49(12):2537-2547. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.08.017. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
The aim of the work described here was to evaluate the feasibility of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2)-targeted microbubble (MB)-based ultrasound molecular imaging (USMI) for visualizing microvessels in cervical cancer.
Hela cells were used to establish subcutaneous cervical cancer models. SMI and MB-based USMI were performed, and the results were compared with intratumoral microvessel density (MVD) in four groups based on tumor diameter (<3 mm, 3-5 mm, 5-7 mm and ≥7 mm). The vascularization index (VI, %) was evaluated for SMI, and the normalized intensity difference (NID) for USMI.
Tumors with diameters ranging from 3 to 5 mm had the highest VI (39.07 ± 1.58) in SMI, and VI significantly decreased with increasing tumor size (all p values <0.001). The strongest signal intensity was observed in very early tumors (d < 3 mm: 43.80 ± 3.58%) after MB administration; the NID gradually decreased with increasing diameter of tumors (all p values = 0.007). However, no significant differences were observed in NID after administration of non-targeted (control) microbubbles (MB) (all p values = 0.125). MB-based USMI had the strongest correlation with MVD in displaying microvessels of cervical cancer compared with SMI and MB (R = 0.78 vs. R = 0.40 and R = 0.38).
These findings validate the superiority and accuracy of MB-based USMI for microvessel imaging and monitoring of angiogenesis in cervical cancer compared with SMI and MB. Nonetheless, SMI remains an alternative to microvessel imaging when ultrasonic contrast agent use is contraindicated.
本研究旨在评估超级微血管成像(SMI)和血管内皮生长因子受体 2(VEGFR2)靶向微泡(MB)基超声分子成像(USMI)在宫颈癌微血管可视化中的可行性。
使用 Hela 细胞建立皮下宫颈癌模型。进行 SMI 和 MB 基 USMI,并根据肿瘤直径(<3mm、3-5mm、5-7mm 和≥7mm)将结果与四组肿瘤内微血管密度(MVD)进行比较。评估 SMI 的血管化指数(VI,%),以及 USMI 的归一化强度差(NID)。
直径在 3-5mm 之间的肿瘤在 SMI 中的 VI(39.07±1.58)最高,随着肿瘤大小的增加,VI 显著降低(均 p 值<0.001)。MB 给药后非常早期的肿瘤(d<3mm:43.80±3.58%)观察到最强的信号强度;随着肿瘤直径的增加,NID 逐渐降低(均 p 值=0.007)。然而,给予非靶向(对照)微泡(MB)后,NID 没有显著差异(均 p 值=0.125)。与 SMI 和 MB 相比,MB 基 USMI 在显示宫颈癌微血管方面与 MVD 具有最强的相关性(R=0.78 与 R=0.40 和 R=0.38)。
与 SMI 和 MB 相比,MB 基 USMI 在宫颈癌微血管成像和血管生成监测方面具有优越性和准确性,验证了其优越性和准确性。然而,当超声对比剂使用受到限制时,SMI 仍然是微血管成像的替代方法。